Was violent or nonviolent protest more effective in the context of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement?
score:25
This is probably a very debatable question, but I think I can make the argument, with good historical backing, that it was the non-violent protests that were most effective in what progress was made in the Civil Rights movement.
Firstly I make this argument in deference to the leaders on the ground. A reading of Freedom Summer, by Bruce Watson* shows that the leadership of SNCC had extended, passionate discussions about whether to use "self-defence" or entirely passive resistance tactics. Stokely Carmichael, future leader of the Black Panthers, unsurprisingly was the lead voice for self-defense. This leadership was strongly southern blacks (unlike Carmichael), who knew exactly what kind of a buzzsaw they were walking into. That they settled on the tactic they did has to at least show that this was what they saw as the most effective tactic at that time. All of these people were in a far better position to judge that than any modern person who has not lived through what they did.
Secondly, lets look what happened with a pure self-defense approach. We can't look at that in isolation in 1964, but we can in 1921. On May 31st of that year, in response to an imminent lynching action, a similar discussion went on the black community of (north) Tulsa. In this case, the case of those arguing for active resistance and self-defense won the day. Guns were gathered, and volunteers set off for the jailhouse to offer their help to the Sheriff. There they dispersed a mob of 1,000 whites besieging the sheriff. So far so good.
The angry mob of whites put out the word that armed black folk were taking over town, the armory was raided, and soon the black community found itself in a pitched battle over the railroad tracks separating the two communities. The north Tulsa community fought bravely, but they just didn't have the numbers. At about 5 AM the tracks were overrun, and the white mob stormed into North Tulsa, and burned it to the ground. By the time the National Guard restored order the next day, hundreds were dead, over a thousand injured, six thousand "interned", and here's what the richest African-American district in the nation looked like the next day:
This wasn't the only such incident of African-American communities attempting self-defense, but it is probably the largest scale one. The people making decisions in the Civil Rights movement knew about these incidents, and others like them. They knew that if you don't have larger numbers, and/or political control, this is what the result of non-passive resistance looks like for you.
* - It is simply not possible for me to recommend this book highly enough.
Upvote:-3
Obviously violent methods were more effective. If you read the civil rights bills they have odd provisions about outlawing transfer of explosives between state lines. Furthermore many civil rights laws were direct result of race riots.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_racial_violence_in_the_United_States
Upvote:26
During the 1960s, non-violent protest was more effective than violent protest at bringing about desegregation in southern cities - especially where black protest groups had some economic leverage over the local community.
We know this thanks to a recent quantitative study, which found that cities with sit-in protests were much more likely to desegregate than otherwise similar cities (all else equal). In fact, protests were so effective that even neighboring cities were more likely to desegregate.
By contrast, the study finds that cities that experienced racial violence were neither more nor less likely to desegregate (all else equal).
Source: Michael Biggs and Kenneth Andrews, "Protest Campaigns and Movement Success: Desegregating the U.S. South in the Early 1960s."
Here's the abstract for the paper:
Can protest bring about social change? Although scholarship on the consequences of social movements has grown dramatically, our understanding of protest influence is limited; several recent studies have failed to detect any positive effect. We investigate sit-in protest by black college students in the U.S. South in 1960, which targeted segregated lunch counters. An original dataset of 334 cities enables us to assess the effect of protest while considering the factors that generate protest itself—including local movement infrastructure, supportive political environments, and favorable economic conditions. We find that sit-in protest greatly increased the probability of desegregation, as did protest in nearby cities. Over time, desegregation in one city raised the probability of desegregation nearby. In addition, desegregation tended to occur where opposition was weak, political conditions were favorable, and the movement’s constituency had economic leverage.
It's a phenomenal paper: incredible data, great methods.
More post
- 📝 How much has U.S. currency inflated since 1792?
- 📝 Did anything come from Sparta, besides fitness and war?
- 📝 Why was Russia never part of NATO?
- 📝 Help me identify this pin?
- 📝 Why didn't Roman emperors have harems?
- 📝 Language Grammar History
- 📝 Why did workers in the Industrial Revolution accept submission?
- 📝 What does WW2 US Army discharge code W.D. CIR 395, 1942 mean?
- 📝 Why is literacy difficult?
- 📝 Did medieval people wear collars with a castellated hem?
- 📝 What was the point of hanging in “hanging, drawing, and quartering”?
- 📝 Aside from the Jews, did Hitler have a final solution plan for other ethnicities/races in the Third Reich?
- 📝 Why is the Qing Dynasty in China considered Feudalistic?
- 📝 Where and when were air guns used in a major battle?
- 📝 Should you be pedantic about the clerical errors you see in a History reference book?
- 📝 What is Poosball, an early 1900s women's team sport?
- 📝 Did Franco really ask "Why? Are they going somewhere?"
- 📝 What percent of the Roman Republic's population were citizens in various centuries?
- 📝 William Penn and the Frame of Government of Pennsylvania
- 📝 What is the best way to describe the form of Japanese government during the years before and during world war 2?
- 📝 Was the Gulf War 1990 a complete surprise, or was a military build up evident?
- 📝 When did tea become "a thing" in England?
- 📝 During the execution of the internment of Japanese during ww2 in the USA, did any other Asian Americans have to prove descent?
- 📝 When, where and with what propagation through Europe did the idea of gypsies stealing children occur?
- 📝 What exactly were currours, and what were they used for?
- 📝 What criteria are used to determine the popularity of Medieval European rulers?
- 📝 Were the heavy war reparations on Germany after World War I the main cause of its hyperinflation in 1923?
- 📝 When was federal sovereign immunity in the U.S. established?
- 📝 What was the Bone Bill in Washington State?
- 📝 Is there a term for the principle of preferring earlier statements over later statements made by historical eye witnesses?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was violent or nonviolent protest more effective in the context of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement?
- 📝 Was the Macedonian phalanx more effective than hoplites?
- 📝 What was the historical context of the 2nd amendment to the US Constitution?
- 📝 Why was sugar cultivation more profitable in the Caribbean/Brazil than West Africa?
- 📝 Why were troops with bayonets often effective against enemy cavalry even though the bayonet was a "secondary" weapon?
- 📝 Was Hiroshima targeted because its mountains would "rebound the explosion back into the city for more damage"?
- 📝 Was the use of captured tanks an effective strategy for Germany?
- 📝 What was meant by the protest sign "Bundestag nach Berlin"?
- 📝 What was the first successful non violent independence movement?
- 📝 Was the Napoleonic era cavalry armour effective against firearms?
- 📝 During feudalism in Europe, was one's allegiance to the lord more or less important than the allegiance to the king?
- 📝 At the Battle of Zama, was the Roman army more "native" than the Carthaginian?
- 📝 How effective was Civil War-era artillery in the rain?
- 📝 When was the last time that a personal union of thrones led to an effective integration of the nations?
- 📝 Why was ancient Christianity more successful than the Roman pantheon and Judaism in gaining followers?
- 📝 What was the context of this famous Genghis Khan quote?
- 📝 Did the food economy of the late Roman republic rely on foreign imports, or was it more localized?
- 📝 What was the context of Queen Juliana's "I can't understand it" quote?
- 📝 What was the context behind Felix Frankfurter's quote?
- 📝 Was it widespread during the 17th and 18th Century for British country people to be evicted and replaced with more profitable agriculture?
- 📝 When, and where, was the word 'Anglican' first used in the context of the Protestant Church of England?
- 📝 How effective was the (Western) Allies bombing campaign over Germany in drawing down the Eastern Front Luftwaffe?
- 📝 What is "Egyptland" in the context of the 1960s black civil rights movement in the US?
- 📝 During internment, how effective was the US at identifying and detaining Japanese-Americans?
- 📝 During the 1850’s and 60’s, was the free North (and its cause in the U.S. Civil War) considered more virtuous than the slave-holding South?
- 📝 Was a technological advantage more effective in European warfare than in China's history?
- 📝 Why was agriculture more conducive to slavery in U.S. South than the North?
- 📝 Was the 1939 Red Army more disciplined / better behaved than the 1943-1945 Red Army?
- 📝 Did Cato the Elder think destruction of Carthage was more important than anything else for Rome?
- 📝 Was Textile Armour More Effective at Stopping Arrows than Mail?