Was a technological advantage more effective in European warfare than in China's history?
score:17
In Europe, armies were often of generally the same size and makeup (at least in the instances you mention) and tactics codified, so in open engagements equipment and (that being equal) minor differences in proficiency could well mean the difference between winning and losing a battle.
In the Chinese example you mention, sheer force of numbers caused Qing to win the day, that and the slow reload time of the opposing cannon as compared to Qing archers. Simply put, despite the cannon killing more Qing troops per shot than were killed per Qing trooper, they were still wiped out because they couldn't kill quickly enough to avoid being overrun.
The same happened during the Korean war, where DPRK and Red Chinese human wave attacks overcame American and South Korean forces despite the latter having superior equipment.
And paradoxically to your question it also played out in Europe during WW2 where after D-day Sherman tanks were engaging German Tiger tanks. While the Tigers had far better guns and armour, and could kill Shermans before the American tanks were even in range, they were usually fighting alone or in such small groups that the massed numbers of Shermans they were facing could close to within range for their underpowered guns to score a kill before they were all destroyed. The same happened on the eastern front as well between T-34s and Tigers.
Another example is the destruction of 3 Roman legions in Germania by Germanic tribes. The Romans had superior equipment and training both, yet were wiped out to the last man because they could not bring that equipment and training to bear effectively against the assault they were facing (they simply weren't trained for what was effectively guerrilla warfare when the Germanic warriors came at them while they were on the march through the dense forest).
Upvote:0
The first cannon the Chinese had, according to the Portuguese were three (3) cannons, presumably ship cannon, manned by Portuguese crews which the emperor specifically requested of them in 1621. Three cannons are not enough to affect a war in which there are many thousands fighting over vast distances. Also, ship cannons use carriages which are not effective in field warfare, which requires much more complicated and advanced carriages, not to mention a skill level way beyond that of a typical ship gunner.
About 50 years later Ferdinand Verbiest, a Portuguese scientist, constructed about 100 cannon for the Chinese emperor, however, by this time the Manchu had completely won and even then it is likely these cannons would have changed the tide of battle for logistical reasons and the problem of providing and moving around Portuguese gunners. Moving cannon around in those was a non-trivial problem because you have to transport the powder too, and keep it dry. Cannon was most effective in siege situations at that time, which was not the problem facing the Ming.
It was not until over a 100 years later that the Chinese acquired "firearms", once again from the Portuguese, and only in very small quantities. For example, the emperor's guard in 1792 was equipped only with halberds. Even in the Opium Wars (1840) the Chinese carrying muskets were so small in number and ineffective in their operations that they were more or less inconsequential. So, your idea that the Chinese were using "firearms" against the Manchu is not correct.
More post
- 📝 US Army stations in France during World war 2
- 📝 What are the tabs/spaces for in the Beowulf text
- 📝 When was glass first used to protect art?
- 📝 Is the story about Mussolini and Oliver Hardy apocryphal?
- 📝 How did the stigmatisation of nationalism begin?
- 📝 Madness in the early modern era (pre-enlightenment, Habsburg monarchy)
- 📝 How common was cavalry in medieval Brittany?
- 📝 Did "droit du seigneur" actually exist in medieval Europe?
- 📝 What can be said about conditions of slaves owned by George Washington?
- 📝 What factors led some South American governments to be sympathetic to Nazi war criminals?
- 📝 What happened with North African oil during the Second World War?
- 📝 What sources could Tacitus or Appian have used that have since been lost?
- 📝 What is the origin of the subdivisions of Heaven and Hell?
- 📝 What were paper airplanes called before there were real airplanes? (i.e. untethered winged flyers, not kites or balloons)
- 📝 Italian History from 1870-1913: Why did Italy have such a hard time becoming a "Great Power" like Germany?
- 📝 Why do people in Melbourne Victoria Australia get a public holiday for a horse race
- 📝 A unitary state split into several smaller ones
- 📝 Why did Native Americans die from European diseases while Europeans didn't catch serious diseases from the New World?
- 📝 Was Black Death a weaponised disease?
- 📝 What are the origins of the "totalitarian genes" theory?
- 📝 Before 1980, was there ever an attempt to evangelise for Orthodox Christianity?
- 📝 Why did the Japanese expect the United States navy would attack the Home Islands?
- 📝 When did people understand where children come from?
- 📝 What is Revolutionary Monotheism?
- 📝 Has any foreign embassy ever been entered without permission?
- 📝 Was the British Army a millionaire factory in the early 20th century?
- 📝 Identifying a badge/medal
- 📝 Where does the concept of traffic keeping to the "right" side of the street originate?
- 📝 America vs. Australia as a "Penal Colony"
- 📝 Why didn't USSR "bust a move" to veto the Korean War?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was a technological advantage more effective in European warfare than in China's history?
- 📝 Was the Macedonian phalanx more effective than hoplites?
- 📝 Was Textile Armour More Effective at Stopping Arrows than Mail?
- 📝 Why was artillery a more effective infantry support weapon on tanks than machine guns?
- 📝 When was Silver ever more valuable than Gold?
- 📝 Why was sugar cultivation more profitable in the Caribbean/Brazil than West Africa?
- 📝 Is Caesar's birth year more certain now than it was when disputed by Mommsen?
- 📝 Was violent or nonviolent protest more effective in the context of the 1960s Civil Rights Movement?
- 📝 During feudalism in Europe, was one's allegiance to the lord more or less important than the allegiance to the king?
- 📝 At the Battle of Zama, was the Roman army more "native" than the Carthaginian?
- 📝 Why was ancient Christianity more successful than the Roman pantheon and Judaism in gaining followers?
- 📝 Was Ashoka motivated more by economics rather than religion in giving up war?
- 📝 Was there more than one way for anti-aircraft fire to shoot down a dive bomber in World War II
- 📝 Why are some Americans more religious than European counterparts?
- 📝 Why was East Asia more religiously tolerant than Europe in medieval time?
- 📝 Did the USSR have a more positive relationship with France than other west european countries after 1945?
- 📝 During the 1850’s and 60’s, was the free North (and its cause in the U.S. Civil War) considered more virtuous than the slave-holding South?
- 📝 Why did European countries become more economically advanced than non European countries?
- 📝 Why was agriculture more conducive to slavery in U.S. South than the North?
- 📝 Was the 1939 Red Army more disciplined / better behaved than the 1943-1945 Red Army?
- 📝 Are Western European countries more ethnically heterogenous than 100 years ago?
- 📝 Why do more historians state Rome was a superpower, than Persia?
- 📝 Did Cato the Elder think destruction of Carthage was more important than anything else for Rome?
- 📝 Was "Street" more common than the abbreviated "St." in pre-1910 American newspapers?
- 📝 Was there ever a president of the united states related to more than 1 other president?
- 📝 If WW2 trench warfare really was a poor use of outdated tactics then what what would have been more appropriate tactics to employ?
- 📝 Why are so many metros underground? Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system?
- 📝 Why were so many more Jewish men than Jewish women killed during the Holocaust?
- 📝 Why was the Council of Nicea held in Nicea rather than Rome or Constantinople?
- 📝 Why was World War I ended on Nov 11 11:00, rather than immediately upon signing the armistice?