Does thought lead to existence?
Upvote:0
Dependant on Karmically potent thoughts, birth occurs. But not all thoughts are Karmically potent.
Upvote:0
Existence in the rebirth cycle is due to ignorance. Thoughts either good/bad arises due to ignorance. Nirvana is a state where delusion/ignorance is completely destroyed. Hence the thoughts of a person who has achieved nirvana are netural. And does not crave for another existance.
Upvote:0
If author aims to get an answer in terms of existence of all life, then the answer is No, thought does not lead to existence. Nor it is required for existence.
For the very fact that plants or bacteria are not self-conscious, but rather simply conscious, and they are considered life. They are able to concur with each other, but without conscious processes and self-awareness, and facility of conceptualisation.
Everything with DNA is considered life that exists.
Thought is, however, required to perceive existence of life and concept of existence of life, it is an abstract term in the realm of mental objects. So, in this context, Yes, but it is dependant.
Overall, just because something does not exist, manifest or can be perceived at this very moment, does not mean that it doesn't exist at all.
Upvote:1
Thoughts exist and lives exist and sentient beings exist. These phenomena are mutually dependent and a first cause cannot be found. This whole phenomenal world is bound up with infinite sets of mutually dependent causes and conditions that are utterly suffused with relative and co-dependent existence. It is not the case that:
"In the beginning, a thought came into existence and dependent upon that life came into existence."
This is not how it is! No beginning can be found or ascertained.
If one looks at "thought" it can be known that "thought" cannot be contemplated without first depending upon "life" and "life" cannot be thought of without first depending upon "thought." They are mutually dependent and along with them whole infinite sets of relative causes and conditions that together conjure up this phenomenal world.
More post
- π Namarupa as 'mentality & materiality', why or why not?
- π Buddha's advice regarding meditation practice
- π Reconciliation of Past Sins
- π It is said that arahants never dream. What are the textual sources for this claim?
- π In Buddhism, is the effect ontologically independent of the cause?
- π Given that Buddhism could accommodate people's prior religious beliefs, why is Buddhism itself now described as a religion?
- π Regarding mindfulness during practice
- π What is the motivation for Torma?
- π Are practical solutions to everyday suffering that contradict Buddhism Upaya or avidya?
- π Food and other cravings, and guarding the senses
- π According to buddhism, do demons exists?
- π Does Vipassana arise from Samatha/Anapanasati meditation? or is it another trap of monkey mind?
- π Is it a sin to organize liqour & meat on cutomer request as a prt of my job?
- π What is a 'pernicious' wrong belief?
- π Overcoming distractions in meditation as per the Tripitaka?
- π Transfering merits
- π What is the difference between learning the Buddhist way and simply learning from life?
- π How does one develop right view in the space of multiple views?
- π Being more spiritual
- π Is procastinating lengthen the samsara?
- π Which Buddhists denominations agree with the difference between pain and suffering as in many DBT texts? Which disagree?
- π What is musavada in the five precepts?
- π Is All-Is-One a buddhist belief?
- π What's the meaning of the Buddhist boy's message to Neo in the movie The Matrix?
- π Not understanding Jhana Mastery Of Reflection?
- π where to get Tattvasiddhi ΕΔstra
- π How does enlightenment relate to the higher realms of existence?
- π The Story of Buddha
- π Does Zen have an unusual view of samadhi?
- π Are Amitabha and Sakyamuni the same?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π How come SN Goenka thought that buying milk does not lead to suffering?
- π Does thought lead to existence?
- π Does studying mathematics or science lead to a practitioner of Buddhism acquiring wrong philosophical views and mental afflictions?
- π Why does insight lead to to compassion?
- π How does Buddhism refute the inherent existence of sub-atomic particles?
- π Is Anapanasati a complete path? Does it, by itself, lead to nirvana?
- π How does *Buddhist* meditation differ from others and lead to awakening?
- π Does Shikantaza lead towards attaining Jhana, if not, is there any progression?
- π What does Buddhism say about the existence of a self?
- π How does the craving or clinging to existence survive after death?
- π How does the craving lead to lust, hatred and delusion?
- π How does one accomplish a reality not governed by the mind when thought is required to function?
- π How does mindfulness practice (sati) lead to jhana?
- π Does the Maha Parinirvana Sutra acknowledge the existence of eternal spirit/soul?
- π Does meditation lead to incarnation?
- π Does sexual liberalism lead to rebirth in the hungry ghost realm?
- π In satipatthana, how does mindfulness lead to nirodha?
- π Does accepting duality lead only to nondual skillfull qualities?
- π Does the Buddha have any practices for groups and societies that would lead society to less suffering, prosperity, not decay?
- π How does higher virtue lead to sexier heavenly sensual rebirth?
- π Does illegal downloading or viewing of copyright material violate the second precept?
- π How does stream entry occur?
- π Masturbation: Does it break the 3rd precept?
- π Where does a person go after attaining Nirvana?
- π Does Zen Buddhism have canonical texts?
- π How does one practice mindfulness during thinking - e.g. thinking about how to solve a problem?
- π Why does the Buddha call himself the TathΔgata?
- π Does meditation increase productivity for software developers and related professions?
- π Last thought before death?
- π How does one explain consistency within phenomena if the mind generates phenomena?