Upvote:0
Being blameless like an arahant is not like being meritorious like a non-arahant. Merit is for people who are not blameless. Only non-good people can do meritorious deeds or non-meritorious deeds.
Fermentations can be meritorious or not, vedana can be meritorious or not, the fruit for lust for kama can be meritorious or not
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an06/an06.063.than.html#part-4
typically meritorious refers to the realms where there is pleasant vedana
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an05/an05.043.than.html
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.235.than.html
Upvote:1
It seems to me that meritorious formations would be rooted in ignorance because wisdom would see the emptiness of such formations. If ignorance is abandoned then such formations and their karmic functions cease to play a role. They have been transcended.
Perhaps one could see this as progressing from the teachings of the first 'Turning' to the fundamental teachings of the third.
EDIT: In the third Turning of the Wheel of Dharma the Buddha "taught about the Buddha nature, the enlightened essence of luminous clarity that is the true nature of the mind of every sentient being."
This is the stage of thorough analysis in which, "in order to help his disciples abandon their clinging to non-existence, the Buddha taught that genuine reality transcends the conceptual fabrications of existence and non-existence, appearance and emptiness, and any other notion of what it might be."
Quotes are from The Sun of Wisdom by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamptso