Was Nicholas II Romanov the last king of Poland?
score:11
Was Nicholas II REAL king of Poland? It is open to interpretations. But IMHO, it was just a title taken by Tsars. There was no state called 'Poland' but fragments or partitions of original Poland, which were provinces/districts in Prussia, Austria and Russia.
Stanisław August Poniatowski was the last king (reign 1764-95) of independent Poland because, Poland ceased to exist as a state after 1795, until it become independent in 1918.
Nicholas II was only the last man to have title - 'King of Poland'.
Partitions - 1772, 1773 and 1795
Map showing territories of Poland annexed by Austria, Prussia and Russia
Poland ceased to exist after three partitions, in 1772,1793 and 1795, done by Prussia, Austria and Russia, Russia gaining the largest fragment.
At Congress of Vienna, in 1815, again Russia got the large part of Napoleonic Duchy of Warsaw as a "Kingdom of Poland" from Prussia. So, Congress of Poland was formed. It was a personal union of the Russian parcel of Poland with the Russian Empire.
So, from 1815, Tsars started using the tile "King of Poland", even though much part of original Poland remained under Prussia and Austria.
Later, after the two uprisings in 1830-31 and 1863-64 in so called Kingdom of Poland, its autonomy was stripped off and it was called Vistula land And in 1867 was made an official part of the Russian Empire. But still Tsars of Russia retained the title of "King of Poland".
So, Nicholas II, as a king of Poland, was NOT like what Henry VIII as a King of France was. France had her own Kings. English monarchs just made claims.
Nicholas II, WW-I and Regency Council:
During WW-I The Kingdom of Poland of 1916-18 was proposed in 1916 by Germany and Austria-Hungary following their conquest of the former Congress Poland or Russian Poland by the Act of 5th November. It was only a client or puppet state of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Regency Council was the highest body and it announced the independence of Poland in 1918.
Nicholas II was not 'overthrown' but was force to abdicate after the February Revolution in March 1917 and later executed in July, 1918. It has nothing to do with Poland, directly.
Upvote:-1
During the Napoleonic wars Napoleon granted Poland a level of autonomy (duchy of warsaw) but it was still a puppet state of the French Empire. Many Poles backed Napoleon, up to 100,000 Poles served in the Grand Armee and King Poniatowski's nephew, Jozef Poniatowski even became a marshal of France. However after the fall of Napoleon the Grand duchy of warsaw, which included lands from Prussia and Austria as well, was left to question of what to do with it. Prince Jerzy Czartoryski, once a dear friend and right hand man to Tsar Alexander vied for the tsar to reclaim the lost territories of Poland and join them to the Russian Empire in a dynastic union, crowning himself "king of Poland". More or less that did happen, Alexander gained the lands of the grand duchy of Warsaw, however they did not reclaim the lands of Partitioned Poland. Alexander did Crown himself King of Poland. This gave rise the the Congress Kingdom of Poland. It was granted a degree of Autonomy; however it was still under the Empire. The congress Kingdom however became slowly liquidated and lost most of all its autonomy; many uprisings in Poland forced the Tsars to punish Polish lands and took away their autonomy and later discouraged Polish indentity and language. However during this whole time they still recognized that they did have Poland in the Russian empire and did style themselves legitimate kings of Poland. ( Russia did in fact have rule over the majority of Partitioned Poland). Most Poles however will say they don't recognize this because they viewed these time as times of supression and foreign rule, to a degree this is correct but one must also see that the Polish nation pre partition was a country with a broken ruling class, very corrupt and almost incapable of self rule which evidently helped lead to the partitions. In the end its a matter of opinion.
Upvote:-1
If anything, it was Michael II of Russia, not Nicholas II who was the last king of Poland. Michael II was formally the tsar of Russia between February 1917 and August 1917 when the Provisional government declared republic. And since Poland declared independence later, it was part of the game.
Upvote:1
No, Nicholas II was not a real king of Poland because after the November Uprising of 1830 was suppressed, under the Organic Statute of 1832 Poland's legislature was abolished and its remaining national institutions probably (though this is open to legal debate) did not qualify it to be called a country in a similar sense that, for instance, Scotland is a country within the (sovereign entity of) United Kingdom.
Nicholas II was overthrown (forced to abdicate) not as King Poland but as Emperor of Russia, although as such his titles included Tsar of Poland. His abdication manifesto did not mention Poland at all and indeed was not in any way intended as instrument of renunciation of Russian sovereignty over the Polish regions in question. From the Polish retroactive point of view, Russia never had sovereignty over Poland in the first place but had been illegally occupying Polish territory, thus no "overthrowing" was required to proclaim Polish independence. The legal ambiguity that characterized Eastern Europe in the aftermath of World War I is reflected in the fact that the treaty of Brest-Litovsk makes no mention of Poland at all.
The last person to be crowned king of Poland was neither Stanisław August, nor Nicholas II, but Nicholas I, in Warsaw in 1829. Poland (within the borders of the Napoleonic Duchy of Warsaw) and Russia at that moment can reasonably be viewed as twin monarchies in personal union; this ceased to be the case 3 years later with the Organic Statute, as mentioned above. No Russian emperor after Nicholas I was crowned as King of Poland, although they retained the title for reasons of prestige but with no legal weight.
Upvote:2
The Duchy of Warsaw, after Napoleonic wars, got the name of the Kingdom of Poland. The entitlement was agreed upon by the Vienne Congress in 1815, not proclaimed by the Russian Czar.
The title of Nikolaj II was, according to picabu or wiki, was:
Божиею поспе́шествующею милостию, Мы, Николай Вторы́й[прим 4], Император и Самодержец Всероссийский, Московский, Киевский, Владимирский, Новгородский; Царь Казанский, Царь Астраханский, Царь Польский.....
In this article, we can believe Wikipedia somewhat, for it has reference to a document from the year 1905
The name of the region remained the same until the revolution in 1917. And after it there was no such entity nor name. So Nikolaj II was the last Polish czar. And not the king.
The difference between these two titles is too complicated to be discussed here, but it is significant. For Russian czars were never kings of any land and refused to be ones, but they were czars - unlimited rulers. And Ponyatovsky was the last king.
More post
- 📝 What divided the Roman Catholic church from the Orthodox church?
- 📝 What kind of building materials did Cavendish use in determining the density of the earth?
- 📝 What is the current U.S. monetary standard?
- 📝 Evolution of United States' world role?
- 📝 Why would Jesus' parents travel to their birthplace for a Roman census?
- 📝 What was the cultural background of Burgundians?
- 📝 Was Nebuchadnezzar made King in a year other than 605 BC?
- 📝 Where can I find more information about former German internal enclaves and exclaves?
- 📝 Were Roman public roads built by private companies?
- 📝 Did Germans and Soviets count casualties differently at the Battle of Kursk?
- 📝 Were there any German submarines sunk after 25th of April 1945?
- 📝 Was the 18th century Russian peasant braver; or simply more afraid of Cossacks?
- 📝 When did the Roman empire start to hire Anglo-Saxon mercenary troops to protect Britain?
- 📝 Queen Victoria and the Tsar’s faberge egg
- 📝 Is there an example of 19th century non-believer who fluently alludes to Scripture?
- 📝 Did Aztecs know how many continents there are on earth?
- 📝 Historical precedent for using bodyguards as special forces?
- 📝 Could some of the Titanic passengers have climbed on the iceberg to survive?
- 📝 Why is the Aztec/Nahuatl Syllabary incomplete?
- 📝 Why, even, various developed countries faced Coup D'etat, Dictatorship and/or Civil War but India didn't?
- 📝 Invasion of southern France
- 📝 Were the republican legati pro praetores appointed by the governors?
- 📝 What does Tuchman mean by transition to a "money economy" in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 How large were Victorian British military forces?
- 📝 What military uniform is this?
- 📝 Why do colonels enjoy some generals' privileges?
- 📝 What was the first example of a foreign mercenary unit?
- 📝 In the Battle of the Coral Sea, how could two Japanese scouts grossly mis-identify two American ships?
- 📝 Why did the baths of Bath need a hypocaust?
- 📝 How and why did Aleksotas became part of the Russian Empire in 1864?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was Nicholas II Romanov the last king of Poland?
- 📝 Who was the last European king to actively engage in combat?
- 📝 Who was the last English king whose first language was French?
- 📝 Why was Poland spared from the Black Death?
- 📝 Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?
- 📝 Was England called England in the days of King Arthur?
- 📝 Who was the last leader of a country to call himself a dictator, or the last regime that called itself a dictatorship?
- 📝 When was the last time a reigning monarch personally participated in battle?
- 📝 Was there a King of England, or an heir to the throne, in 1831 who idolized Michael Faraday?
- 📝 What was the last battle fought mainly by sail-powered ships?
- 📝 When was the last documented occasion that Arab or Ottoman slave traders abducted people from Europe?
- 📝 Which was the last major war in which horse mounted cavalry actually participated in active fighting?
- 📝 Who was the last US president who did not start a war?
- 📝 How was Martin Luther King Jr. viewed by white Americans at the time?
- 📝 When was the last cavalry charge?
- 📝 Why was the last battle of the War of 1812 fought fully half a year after the official end of the war?
- 📝 When was the last time (if ever) an elector was faithless in US presidential elections?
- 📝 Was the Korean King Chungnyeol instrumental in persuading Kublai Khan to invade Japan?
- 📝 Who was the last person "Hanged, Drawn, and Quartered" under British jurisdiction?
- 📝 When was the last promotion in the British Peerage?
- 📝 Did Diderot say "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest"?
- 📝 When was the tactic of chaining ships together last used in a major naval battle?
- 📝 Was the last Japanese surrender after WWII in the 1970s?
- 📝 When was the last time a country acquired territory by buying land from another country?
- 📝 When was the last time that a personal union of thrones led to an effective integration of the nations?
- 📝 Was the king of England able to execute a high rank noble and his family between 1216 and 1688?
- 📝 When was King John of England given the name 'Dollheart', and who first used it?
- 📝 When was the last US letter of marque issued?
- 📝 Was there a case where a king died while the heir to the throne was unborn?
- 📝 When was the last time someone was condemned to slavery as a punishment in the United States?