Was the quality of Roman armor really worse than the armor of knights of the XII-XIV centuries?
Upvote:1
I'm not a metallurgist, that's your field. I'm looking at your question from a historic and economic angle:
Was the quality of Roman armour really worse than the armour of knights of the XII-XIV centuries?
Of course. There is a full millennium between the Roman Empire and the XIV century. Even if technology developed very slowly during the dark ages (early medieval period), progress was there. Every generation added a little to it. Some generations more than others. 40 generations adds a lot.
- What did they (the smithies and armourers) accomplish over time?
Armour became progressively cheaper, lighter and stronger. Look at an early medieval hauberk: it was very expensive to make (many months), worn only by well-to-do military. The sleeves were short, the hauberk reached slightly over the groin area.
It doesn't differ much, if at all, from any Roman armour. Also notice the fairly large shield. Roman shields (republic, early & mid-empire) were even larger. Those relatively large shields were needed to make up for what the armour didn't protect.
As technology progressed, we see more armour worn by more common people. Also, armour would protect more of the body. The hauberk of a Frankish knight wouldn't look overtly strange on an English or a Burgundian footsoldier. (Yes, it would, but the armour worn by Burgundian or English footsoldiers was at least as good if not better as that worn by Frankish knights.)
A knight would of course get the best he could afford, which was a good deal more, being custom designed full plate armour, if he was really rich.
I don't doubt Romans could cast plates, but not cheap, light and strong enough. A Roman cuirass is fairly heavy and seriously more expensive compared with a late medieval cuirass. I've seen Roman gladiators equipped with full plate armour, almost like a late medieval knight. (Sorry, no links.) The type was very rare, but it was possible. Or better phrased: not completely impossible.
I mentioned the shield. I noticed - but can't proof - shields tend to get smaller when the technology of the armour allowed for it. A late XIV century knight would wear a shield more for decorative than practical purpose. An early knight wore a large kite shield. I don't think that was purely coincidental. However, plenty of warriors wore a small shield, so it's just something I noticed.
The Romans themselves developed Lorica Segementata, but dropped it at the end of the second century. The reason was probably very high maintenance and repair costs. The different metals reacted to each other, and it rusted, as we nowadays would say: "in the catalogue". Roman soldiers spend a good deal of their time polishing and fixing their lorica segmentata. Reminds me of my army days when we spend many hours polishing our white canvas belts absolutely white. Was a great way to avoid PT!
More post
- 📝 What was the name of the Ottoman-Spanish truce in 1580?
- 📝 Did pirates really drink a lot of rum?
- 📝 Castaways rescued by a message in a bottle?
- 📝 Were Mongol or Chinese cavalry charges among the largest in history?
- 📝 Was Theodoric the Great killed by Justinian?
- 📝 Why did Germany take so long to consolidate into a single nation?
- 📝 What was the reasoning behind the Washington Committee's complaint to the Liquor Tax during the Whiskey Rebellion?
- 📝 What was the status of peasants who left to join the People's Crusade?
- 📝 When did people decide that all caps means the writer is shouting?
- 📝 What uniform is this probably either Lithuanian or Italian man wearing?
- 📝 Where did this coin come from?
- 📝 Was there anything in common between the War of 1812 between Britain and America and the War of 1812 between Napoleon and Russia?
- 📝 Who presided over the election and swearing in of the first Speaker of the House?
- 📝 Where was gunpowder invented/ discovered?
- 📝 Why did silver gain prominence in trade over gold in Early Medieval Europe?
- 📝 How was ownership of property managed during the Black Death, when so many original owners had died?
- 📝 Are there any old paintings (medieval period onwards) that actually depict the female genitalia rather than just leaving the pubic region empty?
- 📝 What role did the Eastern Roman Empire play in the fall of the Western Roman Empire?
- 📝 Did Gorbachev say that his intention was to destroy Communism?
- 📝 How did the US/South Vietnam lose the Vietnam war?
- 📝 Were there any tests or prerequisites for Blacks and Indians to be admitted to the University of Cape Town during Apartheid?
- 📝 If Hitler did not create a Second Front, could the war in the East have developed very differently?
- 📝 Under what circumstances did the Vikings leave for North America?
- 📝 Was the tide of war ever turned by a wonder weapon?
- 📝 When was the last documented occasion that Arab or Ottoman slave traders abducted people from Europe?
- 📝 How did the Tutsis win the civil war in Rwanda after 70% of them had been killed?
- 📝 In ancient Rome, did a lot of people feel guilty about owning slaves?
- 📝 Why didn't Hitler have more submarines in the English channel?
- 📝 What was the purpose behind Charles II's charter for Connecticut squatter settlements?
- 📝 Were Korean and Tibetan rulers ever styled as 'sons of heaven'?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was the quality of Roman armor really worse than the armor of knights of the XII-XIV centuries?
- 📝 Why was the Roman Empire considered an empire rather than a kingdom (again)?
- 📝 After the fall of the Roman Empire, where did their armor go? Was it used by any dark ages forces?
- 📝 At the Battle of Zama, was the Roman army more "native" than the Carthaginian?
- 📝 How was the naval battle of Guadalcanal affected by Japanese ships loading High Explosive shells rather than Armor Piercing?
- 📝 Why was ancient Christianity more successful than the Roman pantheon and Judaism in gaining followers?
- 📝 Was the Byzantine follis larger than the Roman (and why, if yes)?
- 📝 Why did archery not make a comeback when armor was phased out in the 18th century?
- 📝 Was race really unimportant in the 1660's?
- 📝 Why was the Council of Nicea held in Nicea rather than Rome or Constantinople?
- 📝 Why was World War I ended on Nov 11 11:00, rather than immediately upon signing the armistice?
- 📝 Was slavery really on the way out in the antebellum USA?
- 📝 Were the living standards in Medieval Europe a lot worse than in the Muslim world?
- 📝 Why was sugar cultivation more profitable in the Caribbean/Brazil than West Africa?
- 📝 Why was Kaliningrad placed under the Russian SFSR rather than the Lithuanian SSR?
- 📝 What was the average height of Roman men and women?
- 📝 Was there really a navy officer named Picard at the Battle of Trafalgar?
- 📝 Was the Roman Empire based on a 'plunder economy'?
- 📝 Was Islam really responsible for the Italian Renaissance?
- 📝 Was the "drowning man prays to God, but ignores the boats God sends" joke/tale known in Ancient Roman times?
- 📝 What was the importance of the patrician class in the Roman Empire?
- 📝 What was the life expectancy of an ancient Roman child and adult?
- 📝 Were the lands of the Teutonic Knights part of the Holy Roman Empire?
- 📝 Were there any Roman villas in Britain which were used rather than destroyed after the Romans left?
- 📝 Was the Battle of Tours really the turning point for the Umayyad expansion into Europe?
- 📝 Why did Operation Market Garden go ahead when the allies knew German armor was in the area?
- 📝 What was the attitude of English knights towards their longbowmen counterparts?
- 📝 What was the northernmost region/city in the Roman Empire that spoke Greek as the native language?
- 📝 During feudalism in Europe, was one's allegiance to the lord more or less important than the allegiance to the king?
- 📝 What was the official language used across European monarchies in the XII century?