How can one judge how accurate a given Bible translation is?

Text notes 📝 text notes help the best. NKJV,HCSB,CSB,NASB have the best for Formal translation bibles comparing the different manuscript s falowed by the NLT in a dynamic translation.The KJV and ESV are lacking in text notes for two of Most literal translations.The KJV is strictly off the Byztine (majority text) text with no foot notes of the Alexzandria text(critical older text) and the ESV omits verses found in other versions with out foot notes for the other manuscripts.

Part of the reason why so many translations exist is that different traditions do not always agree about what makes a translation good. You will probably not find a resource that takes the work out of picking for you, in part because "accuracy" is not in itself a metric with a purely objective standard.

When choosing a Bible translation, you should first decide what kind of translation you are interested in. You might even choose to reference more than one kind for different purposes. Once you know what sort you need it narrows the list down quite a lot. Doing the background work on the exact translation philosophy and looking at how it is received from people with similar objectives should narrow your options pretty fast.

Of course if you have specific questions about individual translations you may always ask those here as well, as for example I did about the KJV.

One approach which would work if you're looking at individual passages would be to take the passage concerned and examine it in a number of different translations. Give each translation a weighting according to popularity, critical acclaim and goal of the translators or similar properties and then compare each translation to see which ones differ significantly. Chances are, if there is a large difference, that translation may not be accurate for that passage.

"How accurate is translation X compared to translation Y?" sounds like a simple question, but it really isn't at all. There really can't be a single definitive translation, for a variety of reasons.

Some questions to ask about any particular translation are:

1. What source texts were being used? Newer translations aren't automatically better than older ones, but most scholars will agree (for instance) that the King James / Authorized Version must suffer from the fact that the translators only had access to relatively late copies of many texts.

2. What is the goal of this particular translation? The Good News Bible is more about accessibility than accuracy, so while it strives to be a faithful rendition, the need to use a compact vocabulary and keep sentences simple means that some nuances will be lost.

3. *Are there footnotes showing, for instance, important variant readings?" Translations that aim for high accuracy should also draw their readers' attention to issues such as doubt over the meaning of particular words, cases where there are rival ways of seeing where sentences and phrases start and end (there's no punctuation in all those Greek texts!) and significant differences between source texts that haven't been resolved by scholarship.

There really isn't - and couldn't be - such a thing as a definitive translation - even less a permanent one. Language just doesn't work like that. But it's well worth getting to know the aims, strengths and weaknesses of a few translations, particularly if you want to get to grips with the fine detail.

For me, I most often read Today's New International Version, because I find it reads very naturally, if I'm studying more deeply I'll reach for the *New Revised Standard Version," and if I'm looking to freshen up my view I'll add in a reading with more of the translator's personality, such as Eugene Petersen's The Message or J. B. Phillips (not a complete Bible translation). I have a host of others on shelves both actual and virtual, and I have at least enough rusty Greek to put an interlinear (Greek with English) to use if I want to try and see why translations differ.