How do Mormons view this prophecy Joseph Smith seemingly added about himself in Genesis 50:33?
score:14
When viewed from the belief that Joseph Smith was not a prophet and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is false, or that the Bible is perfect and unchanged from the day it was written1, the only conclusion is that Joseph was writting himself into history.
When viewed from the belief that Joseph Smith is a prophet and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true, the only conclusion is that Joseph restored a portion of the Old Testament that had been lost. A portion that supports his claim of being a prophet of the Lord.
Remember that we believe the Bible is not perfect. That over the course of time information has been lost (whether deliberately or by virtue of translation, it doesn't matter). We learn from the Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 13:25-26 (my emphasis):
Wherefore, these things [the Bible] go forth from the Jews in purity unto the Gentiles, according to the truth which is in God. And after they go forth by the hand of the twelve apostles of the Lamb, from the Jews unto the Gentiles, thou seest the formation of that great and abominable church, which is most abominable above all other churches; for behold, they have taken away from the gospel of the Lamb many parts which are plain and most precious; and also many covenants of the Lord have they taken away.
1 Nephi chapter 13 is actually a lengthy prophecy. It makes for an interesting read. But, to specifically answer your questions:
(1) No, it specifically refers to Joseph Smith.
(2) The passage is something that God wanted Joseph to include.
(3) Nope, that's it.
1 If you want to discuss how perfect the Bible is, talk to a Jew. The Jews have a strong opinion about the quality of Christianity's Old Testament, but that's an answer for another question.
EDIT: After reading Luke's comment I wished I hadn't included my footnote as it doesn't actually add anything to the conversation. But, I'm kinda stuck with it... so I popped over to Judiasm.SO and asked them what they thought.
The most voted answer begins with the statement, "KJV may give the general sense of a translation in most cases. It definitely has a Christian bend and does not always follow the Jewish traditions in translation." It then provides a number of illustrative examples, including Isaiah 7:14, which illustrates the reason I included the footnote.
The Hebrew word for "virgin" isn't used in the original text. The word that is used is most commonly translated "young girl." Does this upset my faith? Of course not. But if King James' monks, who I do not believe had authority from God to translate His word, can't be trusted not to bias their translation in favor of their preferred belief, neither can anyone else who does not have, as I believe, authority from God to do so. From Joseph's journal (today referred to as the "Documentary History of the Church or DHC) we read:
From sundry revelations which had been received, it was apparent that many important points touching the salvation of man, had been taken from the Bible, or lost before it was compiled. (DHC, vol. 1, p. 245.)
I believe the Bible as it read when it came from the pen of the original writers. Ignorant translators, careless transcribers, or designing and corrupt priests have committed many errors. (DHC, vol. 6, p. 57.)
I stand by my footnote, despite wishing I hadn't included it, with one exception. I should not have boldly used the word "strong."
Upvote:1
The prophecy in question was actually made by Joseph of Egypt, and was first recorded in modern times in the Book of Mormon, in the third chapter of Second Nephi. Joseph of Egypt prophesied of the choice seers to come, namely Moses, and Joseph Smith:
14 And thus prophesied Joseph, saying: Behold, that seer will the Lord bless; and they that seek to destroy him shall be confounded; for this promise, which I have obtained of the Lord, of the fruit of my loins, shall be fulfilled. Behold, I am sure of the fulfilling of this promise;
15 And his name shall be called after me; and it shall be after the name of his father. And he shall be like unto me; for the thing, which the Lord shall bring forth by his hand, by the power of the Lord shall bring my people unto salvation. (2 Nephi 3)
The Lord inspired the Prophet Joseph Smith to restore truths to the King James Bible text that had become lost or changed since the original words were written. These restored truths clarified doctrine and improved scriptural understanding.1
The record of this prophesy from ancient Joseph's time was preserved in the Brass Plates, and subsequently in the Gold Plates, then translated by Joseph Smith. Keep in mind that Mormons believe Joseph literally translated an ancient record. The question has been put forward by more than one speaker, as to what Joseph Smith must have felt or thought after realizing he was translating a prophecy about himself, and discovering that other prophecies in the Bible were in reference to him (see Prophecies in the Bible about Joseph Smith).
It is apparent that the prophecy in question took place during the events recorded in Genesis 50, hence why Joseph restored them to that section of scripture while completing the work of retranslating the Bible.
Upvote:4
From the point of view of the believing Latter Day Saint, everything Joseph Smith added was not added, but "restored", meaning that it was originally there and unnamed wicked people removed it. Mormons do not accept Joseph Smith as a prophet because of rational proofs, but because each one is encouraged to pray to God and get an individual confirmation, called a "testimony", from the Holy Spirit. Once a person has such a testimony, then additional facts don't matter because God has already spoken.
Before you condemn this world-view too roundly, consider that some Christians believe the Bible is unerring and perfect in spite of the fact that there are numerous inconsistencies, monstrous immoralities on the part of God and at least one documented false prophecy (in Jeremiah if I remember right). Most of the prophecies about Jesus mentioned in the New Testament are taken grossly out of context. Great example is the "for unto us a son is born..." passage that gets quoted in every Christmas play. If you read the entire chapter in Isaiah, that verse cannot possibly refer to Jesus because the timing is all wrong. Passage likely refers to King Hezekiah. Once you already "know" Jesus was son of God, then you start seeing prophecies about him lurking behind every verse. Muslims can't look at the inconsistencies in the Quran and spend a lot of time justifying some pretty scary verses.
Once you accept something as Holy, facts don't matter so much any more. It is only from those outside the faith community that the inconsistencies matter.
- My faith is sacred and holy and true
- If something about my faith is profane or false, refer to rule #1
More post
- 📝 Which Protestant denominations support the position that Peter is the rock that Jesus builds his church upon?
- 📝 Scriptural basis for replacement theology?
- 📝 Did Martin Luther and Zwingli not consider each other brothers in Christ?
- 📝 Was the matter of whether the Christians who had renounced their faith under torture should be accepted back considered in the First Council?
- 📝 What does it mean that Satan is "god of this world"?
- 📝 Is Jesus presently seated on a throne?
- 📝 According to Trinitarians who believe Philippians 2:6 says Jesus is God, why did Paul add the word 'form' ('morphe')?
- 📝 How do local flood proponents explain God's promises to never do it again?
- 📝 How do we know that Satan, Lucifer, and Devil are the same guy?
- 📝 Does being Protestant imply you are also a Zionist?
- 📝 Could the pope adopt a child?
- 📝 Water Baptism - Is it still necessary?
- 📝 Is it appropriate to leave a Catholic rosary in place on a cemetary headstone?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Magisterium advise the married laity to defend the institution of marriage?
- 📝 According to Catholic Church tradition, where, when, how and by whom did the devotion of the Stations of the Cross begin?
- 📝 According to post-2000 Young Earth Creationists / premillennialists, when do (did) we reach year 6000?
- 📝 What is the difference between humans as "image of God" and Jesus as "image of God"?
- 📝 What is the meaning of a Catholic Saint being "Raised to the Altar"?
- 📝 Can you explain this Free Will / Predestination illustration?
- 📝 What are the objections to Newton's critique of 1 John 5:7 and 1 Timothy 3:16?
- 📝 Fr. Pedro de Corpa and Companions
- 📝 Could a Catholic Church minister distribute communion to the community while churches are closed?
- 📝 Does the Bible give us any indication of why God created such a vast universe with so much stuff in it?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for Dispensational Premillennialism?
- 📝 Are Paul's letters to be taken as God's word?
- 📝 What is a spirit attachment?
- 📝 Why do Jehovah Witnesses think that the cross doesn't have hands?
- 📝 Does Romans 7:20 contradict Genesis 4:7?
- 📝 In what ways did orthodox trinitarianism diverge from Tertullian's proto-trinitarianism?
- 📝 How are the Catholic church's teaching on plastic surgery and GRS self-consistent?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do Mormons view this prophecy Joseph Smith seemingly added about himself in Genesis 50:33?
- 📝 The Mormon Church teaches that Joseph Smith saw God the Father and His Son. How do you reconcile this when the Bible says the Father cannot be seen?
- 📝 How do Mormons interpret the warning in Revelation about adding to the book?
- 📝 How did the author of Jonah know about this conversation?
- 📝 How did Brigham Young become the most well-known Mormon leader (after Joseph Smith left the scene)?
- 📝 According to the LDS Church (Mormons), how specifically did Joseph Smith translate the Book of Mormon?
- 📝 How does the view of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints about Jesus Christ differ from Protestant Trinitarian Christology?
- 📝 How do Mormons view events like the Holocaust considering that they view Adam's fall as a move forward?
- 📝 Why do Mormons believe that Joseph Smith is necessary to teach us?
- 📝 God and Satan in the book of Job: how did they know about this conversation?
- 📝 How many wives did Joseph Smith Jr. have in his lifetime?
- 📝 How do Protestants view the prophecy and birth of Jesus
- 📝 If Joseph Smith "inaccurately" translated Egyptian hieroglyphs in his Book of Abraham, does this cast doubt on his translation, the Book of Mormon?
- 📝 How do non-LDS Christians respond to the LDS argument that Joseph Smith died as a Martyr for God, just like the Apostles?
- 📝 Mormon Prophet Joseph Smith claimed that God the Father and Jesus Christ appeared to him. How did he know it was really the Father and the Son?
- 📝 Mormons believe in more than one god so how do they reconcile this belief with 1 Timothy 1:17?
- 📝 How do theistic evolutionists view the Fall of Man?
- 📝 How do Protestants view "Catholic" miracles, such as those that attest to a saint?
- 📝 Why do Young-Earth Creationists make such a big deal about the YEC view
- 📝 How did St John of Damascus view Islam?
- 📝 How does the Arminian view of salvation account for God's sovereignty?
- 📝 Do Mormons secretly pray about you and then consider you included in their church?
- 📝 How is the view of guaranteed salvation for infants justified?
- 📝 How old were Joseph & Mary when they marrried?
- 📝 Why did Joseph Smith translate the Book of Mormon into Jacobean English, not in use in 1830?
- 📝 Does Joseph Smith fail the test of a prophet?
- 📝 How can these inconsistencies about Jesus' tomb be explained?
- 📝 How we do we know that Joseph wasn't Hyksos?
- 📝 How did Augustine of Hippo feel about Jerome's Latin translation of the Bible (the Vulgate)?
- 📝 Is there any manuscript or historical evidence to support the final 13 verses of Genesis 50 that appear in the Joseph Smith Translation?