Does truth of emptiness imply that nothing existent ever ends?
Upvote:1
Like the first verse of Nagarjuna's Madhyamikakarika, Prasangika refute the four extremes of production. Nagarjuna says:
Neither from itself nor from another, nor from both, nor without a cause, does anything whatever, anywhere arise.
What is produced is not truly produced (in the sense that it is not inherently produced), and what ceases does not truly cease (in the sense that it does not inherently cease). There is (conventional) production from another, but not inherent (or true) production from another... and there is no production from itself, be it truly/ultimately or conventionality.
You say:
To my understanding a person is an impermanent ever changing phenomenon. That the person is like an illusion that continues from moment to moment in this life. If that is so, then how is death different?
It's a great question. Death is different in that the mental continuum separates from the body. There is no such separation before death (except in rare cases of powa etc.) That is how death is different from the constant changes that occur in life. Even though no aggregate stays the same from one moment to the next, there is usually no such separation (of the mind stream from the body) before death.
In addition, since the aggregates belong to the same continuum, we can impute the same name on them although they have changed. It is what we do when we look a picture of us at age 10 and say "Look! It's me when I was ten."
More post
- π Should you practices the noble eightfold path all at once or master is separately?
- π Stephen Batchelor's current meditation practice
- π What is the difference between panna vimutti and ceto vimutti?
- π Is being entertained always considered a negative thing?
- π bKaβgyur , words of the Buddha?
- π Does Krishnamurti claim of No Path, No Progress, No Goal fit with Buddhist thought?
- π What is the 'key' to these tantrika works?
- π anapanasati: nimitta or ambient light?
- π Is the path an individual journey?
- π What does Buddhism teach about energy?
- π Most efficient practices you will quickly do to recover/re-generate Bodhicitta and/or right view of ΕΕ«nyatΔ if realizing losing mindfulness of?
- π How can I practice mindfulness meditation with sound, not breathing?
- π what separates us from our identity to another person
- π Can a person without any of the five physical senses attain arhatship?
- π What is the textual source of the 4 infinitudes and the 6 coolnesses?
- π What is vedanΔ?
- π Karma: Intention vs knowing result of an action
- π No more kamma and vipaka for Noble Ones?
- π Does this count as breaking the first precept?
- π cycling through the 16 nanas all day?
- π What are the Sutta stating ParamithΓ€ requirements to be a stream winner?
- π Why did Buddhism nearly become extinct in Sri Lanka?
- π How do zen practitioners balance the mix between Buddhism detachment and Taoism attachment?
- π Meditation and Pleasure
- π Is self-immolation an ethical act?
- π What did the Buddha do, and what does a teacher do, to teach?
- π If a kind and generous Christian died 20 years ago, might their rebirth have resulted in there being a 19 year old person in the human realm now?
- π Can all human beings potentially be enlightened in this lifetime?
- π How to practise SN 15.14 to attain enlightenment?
- π Methods for reaching Jhana
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Does truth of emptiness imply that nothing existent ever ends?
- π Does any sect claim that only Shakyamuni will ever achieve great nirvana
- π Does an arahant ever reveal that he is an arahant?
- π Does the Samajivina Sutta imply that a Buddhist should only marry another Buddhist?
- π How does the first noble truth associate dukkha with each of the five skandhas?
- π Ajahn Brahm stated that he ate snakes and frogs during his training, does this mean that it is acceptable to kill animals?
- π Does the universe ever end?
- π Does Pure Land Buddhism ever have a Buddha other than AmitΔbha as the object of devotion?
- π Does the Doctrine of No Soul mean there is nothing permanent to continue?
- π Does SN44.9 imply an intermediate state between births?
- π Did Buddha ever say that educated people would be a problem?
- π How does one know that he's reached a Jhana level in Metta meditation?
- π Does any Mahayana school teach that I am atman?
- π How does the 2nd Noble truth explain the cause of suffering-as-suffering (e.g. resulting from a severe burn)?
- π Did the Buddha ever refute the view of "extreme metaphysical nihilism" e.g. a view that "nothing is real"?
- π Buddhists advise against "me and mine" does that include times?
- π How does rebirth fit with the fact that everything is impermanent?
- π Does Vajrayana accept the idea that Buddha placed Lord Yama (a supposed Bodhisattva) in charge of the hell realms to ensure karmic retribution?
- π Does Avalokiteshvara speak through the Buddha in the Heart Sutra? Or how is it that Avalokiteshvara speaks to Shariputra?
- π Does enlightenment in all teachings amount to a progressively deeper realisation that I am already enlightened?
- π What does "heard" mean in "I allow fish and meat that is pure in three respects: One has not seen, heard, or suspected..."
- π Does Jukai imply a student commitment to the preceptor?
- π Who is ignorant and when does one realize that one is ignorant?
- π Why do Buddhists argue that nirvana is nothing in addition to the skandhas?
- π Does any buddhist school, extant or otherwise, say that there is no svabhava what-so-ever?
- π Speaking falsehood is sinful. Does it mean speaking is the truth is no sinful?
- π Where does it say that venerable Moggallana got lost in space?
- π Why does the third noble truth not include the ten fetters?
- π Does any real existent or genuine person end with parinibbana?
- π In which sutta does a lay disciple of the Buddha tell a non-buddhist mendicant that he has experienced jhana?