Why do Buddhists argue that nirvana is nothing in addition to the skandhas?
score:2
In the Yamaka Sutta, Ven. Sariputta, made Yamaka to understand that the five skandas are anicca. If one truly understands this reality the extinction of the process happens in the form of ‘Nibbana’. If we willingly attach to these five skandas with the nicca sanna, then we suffer. Only in realizing that nothing can be maintained to one’s satisfaction in the long run, can we arrive at Nibbana.
Nibbana is not sunnata or emptiness. The person who attained Nibbana is only empty of the five upadanaskandas. The five skandas remain. It is like this. if we take a water bottle and pour the water out, we say we have an empty bottle. But in reality there is air in the bottle, so the bottle is empty only with regard to water; it is not empty regard to air.
Thus what is meant was that “it is empty of”. There is no absolute “emptiness”. At Nibbana one is empty of greed (raga), hate (dosa), and ignorance (moha). At Arahanthood, even the slightest bondage to anything material is discarded.
For one who has attained Nibbana, there is only "ditthē dittha mattan bhavissati- sutē suta mattan bhavissati- mutē muta mattan bhavissati” – There is only seeing in the ‘seeing’; only hearing in the ‘hearing’ etc. It is only you and I, that take nimithi & anu nimithi (impressions of objects) from what we hear or see.
As long as there is greed, ill will & delusion we retain impressions of objects (nimithi anu nimithi) of self & pleasurable things. The impressions stimulate our senses and thus we see people & things around us. Only the minds that are polluted with greed, hatred & delusion associate four elements. The one who sees arising ceasing nature of aggregates sees the emptiness of any inherent meaning & will not retain impressions thereby abandoning the defilements of greed hatred and delusion.
Upvote:1
I think that the topic of the sutta you referenced is anatta.
For example the discussion with Sariputta starts with,
"What do you think, my friend Yamaka: Is form constant or inconstant?"
"Inconstant, my friend."
"And is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?"
"Stressful, my friend."
"And is it proper to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as: 'This is mine. This is my self. This is what I am'?"
An important part of Buddhist doctrine is to not identify in this way with form (nor any other skandha).
Another way to phrase this is that we shouldn't become attached (nor try to become attached to) to any specific view of self (the answer to the questions which you quoted was "no", and "no", and "no").
The suttas are full of this: they mention "clinging-aggregates" in the first noble truth of first sutta; "non-self" as the subject of the second sutta; questions involving views-of-self being described as "attending inappropriately" and leading to "a thicket of views" in MN 2; "being" being identified with suffering in SN 5.10, and so on.
Given that anatta is recommended for us, presumably the Buddha has perfected that practice. So in the same way that we should not have some fixed of self (and in particular shouldn't identify it with the skandhas, nor identify it with something other than the skandhas), a similar doctrine is appropriate for a view of the Tathagata (note that the "Tathagata" is a title or a description of the Buddha).
So I think that's a summary, a brief explanation, of the sutta you referenced. People talk about it a lot (there are 60+ topics on this site tagged anatman, and others on the topic of "self" and "identity-view" and so on), but it's kind of fundamental, with not-self being one of the Three marks of existence.
You also quoted, "when you can't pin down the Tathagata" ... for more on a similar topic I recommend Why is the Buddha described as trackless?.
The last sentence of the question is, "On the grounds that nirvana is all that the Tathagata is".
I'm not sure it's right to identify the Tathagata with nirvana i.e. to say that the Tathagata is nirvana, nor than nirvana is the Tathagata.
Nirvana is commonly described by what it isn't, especially "not born", i.e. it's unconditioned (also "deathless" and so on), or perhaps more positively as liberation or as the end of stress.
There are suttas and essays about what nirvana is (e.g. here and here and here)
More post
- 📝 Can a person live by the Dhamma and have another religion as well?
- 📝 Scientific approach of Kamma
- 📝 Best advice to deniers of rebirth?
- 📝 Do Buddhist texts record or comment on the then-prevalent varna or caste systems?
- 📝 Is daydreaming bad (outside of meditation)?
- 📝 Attachment and the three poisons
- 📝 Misunderstanding of the Buddha’s words on karma
- 📝 Is financial speculation ethical according to Buddhism?
- 📝 Does the fifth precept ban smoking?
- 📝 Can we own a bird pet which will in a cage?
- 📝 Why is it necessary to scan entire body in Vipassana?
- 📝 Why Lord Buddha didn't stay alive till the end of this "Kalpa"
- 📝 Did the Buddha tell how to visit another part of universe via meditation?
- 📝 Buddhist Tribunal on Human Rights and International Buddhist Ethics Committee
- 📝 Answering Zizek's challenge to Buddhism
- 📝 Other than physical form which characteristics define a woman?
- 📝 Dependent Origination: causes vs conditions?
- 📝 Definition of Dukkha
- 📝 What was the historical Buddha's ethnicity?
- 📝 Sutta references for hindrances and jhana related statements
- 📝 What is meant by "No limiting action remains there"? MN 99
- 📝 Proper way to address a bhikkhu?
- 📝 Problem solving attitude
- 📝 Mindfulness of breathing - What is meant by "arising and passing away of the body"?
- 📝 Does suffering entail being overwhelmed for the person who is suffering?
- 📝 What is the Buddhist text quoted by the Hindu philosopher Yogaraja?
- 📝 28 Yaksha Generals
- 📝 Feelings while meditating
- 📝 What is the history and (current) location of the root text sources comprising the Pali Cannon?
- 📝 Does the Maha Parinirvana Sutra acknowledge the existence of eternal spirit/soul?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why do Buddhists argue that nirvana is nothing in addition to the skandhas?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe that the Buddha was enlightened, despite that he claimed it himself?
- 📝 If Buddhism is about moderation, then why is it that you can attain nirvana only after renouncing worldly possessions?
- 📝 There is a text where Buddha says that the Dharma he teaches is not a secret doctrine so why are there sects which maintain secrecy?
- 📝 Why are so many Buddhists in the west hostile to academic analyses of the religion?
- 📝 Why are the psychological forces that stop us from attaining Nibbana greater/stronger than those propel us towards Nibbana?
- 📝 Do all Buddhists say that nirvana exists?
- 📝 Why is that the pleasent feelings last for small time while unplesent feelings seem to last forever?
- 📝 What do Buddhists think of the premise that power is a necessary good and a necessary evil?
- 📝 If Buddhists believe that life is just suffering why don't they just kill themselves?
- 📝 Is Nirvana the goal for all Buddhist?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe there is no creator?
- 📝 How concerned should Buddhists be with the actions of others?
- 📝 If Buddha stayed unanswered on this matter, why do his followers preach that soul doesn't exist?
- 📝 Questions on the five Skandhas
- 📝 Why did the Buddha suffer before he died?
- 📝 Why does the Buddha call himself the Tathāgata?
- 📝 What are the texts that contain words which can be attributed directly to the Buddha?
- 📝 Attachment is a poison. Why is attachment to the Buddha and to Buddhist philosophy not a problem?
- 📝 Why would anyone ever want to go to the heavens?
- 📝 How to refute the idea that Buddhism might be actually "too extreme"?
- 📝 Why is contributing to the market demand for meat not wrong?
- 📝 Why the Buddha didn't originally allow ordination of women
- 📝 What would Buddhists do to get rid of the feeling of insecurity in relationships?
- 📝 Did the Buddha really say that "life is suffering"?
- 📝 Why did Mahayana leave out the Pali Canon?
- 📝 Why is the Buddha described as trackless?
- 📝 Why should we stop the Samsara?
- 📝 Why does the Buddha always answer a question if asked three times?
- 📝 If there is no soul or self, why did the Buddha speak of his past lives?