Does an arahant ever reveal that he is an arahant?
score:4
I think the Buddha said he was an Arahant. The Ariyapariyesana Sutta says,
"Then, wandering by stages, I arrived at Varanasi, at the Deer Park in Isipatana, to where the group of five monks were staying. From afar they saw me coming and, on seeing me, made a pact with one another, (saying,) 'Friends, here comes Gotama the contemplative: living luxuriously, straying from his exertion, backsliding into abundance. He doesn't deserve to be bowed down to, to be greeted by standing up, or to have his robe & bowl received. Still, a seat should be set out; if he wants to, he can sit down.' But as I approached, they were unable to keep to their pact. One, standing up to greet me, received my robe & bowl. Another spread out a seat. Another set out water for washing my feet. However, they addressed me by name and as 'friend.'
"So I said to them, 'Don't address the Tathagata by name and as "friend." The Tathagata, friends, is a worthy one, rightly self-awakened. Lend ear, friends: the Deathless has been attained. I will instruct you. I will teach you the Dhamma. Practicing as instructed, you will in no long time reach & remain in the supreme goal of the holy life for which clansmen rightly go forth from home into homelessness, knowing & realizing it for yourselves in the here & now.'
The book In the Buddha's Words by Bhikkhu Bodhi translates "is a worthy one" in this sentence as "is an Arahant",
"Thereupon I told them: 'Monks, do not address the Tathagata by name and as "friend." The Tathagata is an Arahant, a Perfectly Enlightened One. Listen, monks, the Deathless has been attained. I shall instruct you, I shall teach you the Dhamma. Practicing as you are instructed, by realizing it for yourselves here and now through direct knowledge you will soon enter and dwell in that supreme goal of the holy life for the sake of which clansmen rightly go forth from the home life into homelessness.'
I suppose the reason was to persuade the five to listen to his teaching, to benefit them.
FYI page 136 of The Patimokkha Training Rules Translated and Explained,
This would have led some people to remain secretly convinced of Ven. Dabba Mallaputta’s guilt and—because he was an arahant—would have been for their long-term detriment and harm.
... which might imply that someone who is (secretly or not-so-secretly) against an arahant would be so to their detriment. So might that perhaps be another reason for an aharant's "revelation"?
Page 86 through 98 explains the following rule,
Should any bhikkhu, without direct knowledge, claim a superior human state, a truly noble knowledge and vision, as present in himself, saying, “Thus do I know; thus do I see,” such that regardless of whether or not he is cross-examined on a later occasion, he—being remorseful and desirous of purification—might say, “Friends, not knowing, I said I know; not seeing, I said I see—vainly, falsely, idly,” unless it was from overestimation, he also is defeated and no longer in affiliation.
So I suppose the rule is to forbid knowingly lying about it.
There might be another rule for not saying such a thing to a lay person (page 92),
Claiming a superior human state that one mistakenly thinks one has achieved is no offense under this rule, although if addressed to a lay person the claim would come under Pc 8.
Note that "superior human state" is not just "being an aharant" but also attainments of jhana, samadhi, fruits of the path, abandoning defilements, being free from hindrances, etc.
More post
- 📝 Meditation not linear
- 📝 Why do Bhikkhunis have so many extra Vinaya rules?
- 📝 What kind of influence did Cārvāka had on Buddha's philosophy
- 📝 What are The Four Great Elements?
- 📝 What happens to my body when I breathe out?
- 📝 Will earth become a planet without Humans?
- 📝 The noble truths and eight fold path aren't holy than a learner. when a learner becomes a teacher?
- 📝 Buddhism and thought crime
- 📝 How difficult is it to be a foreign monk in Asia?
- 📝 Is it true that its always thoughts that creates emotions?
- 📝 Do Buddha represent the Cosmic Man? Does it have similarity to Brahman?
- 📝 Controlling one's sexual thoughts
- 📝 Is it possible to reconcile the evolution theory with Buddhism?
- 📝 can any one please explain me the significance of Talipot fan in Buddhism?
- 📝 Explain consciousness (viññāna) to non-Buddhists
- 📝 I am asking personal help, I want to renounce my home?
- 📝 The Simultaneity of Cause and Effect
- 📝 What was the 1st Buddhist Council about?
- 📝 Who were some people who attained Buddhahood after the historical Buddha?
- 📝 Yama depiction on various Tankas
- 📝 How come Devdutta is also Buddha's brother-in-law?
- 📝 Masculine and Feminine Potencies
- 📝 Is there a reason that monasticism is an afterthought?
- 📝 How do you know which mantra suits you the most?
- 📝 Shariputra and a bodhisattva losing bodhicitta
- 📝 Do you have to become a Monk to attain enlightment?
- 📝 Does dukkha apply to name-and-form?
- 📝 Is it bad karma to think but not claim that one is enlightened, or just bad for your practice?
- 📝 Do any modern ("free-thinking") monks or monastic orders discard elements of the Vinaya?
- 📝 Did the Buddha speak Pali? Are the suttas his word verbatim?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Does an arahant ever reveal that he is an arahant?
- 📝 Does any sect claim that only Shakyamuni will ever achieve great nirvana
- 📝 Does truth of emptiness imply that nothing existent ever ends?
- 📝 Does depicting Jesus as an Arahant show that Buddhism is inclusive and compassionate?
- 📝 How does an arahant know that ignorance won't return/re-arise after death?
- 📝 Ajahn Brahm stated that he ate snakes and frogs during his training, does this mean that it is acceptable to kill animals?
- 📝 Does the universe ever end?
- 📝 Does Pure Land Buddhism ever have a Buddha other than Amitābha as the object of devotion?
- 📝 Did Buddha ever say that educated people would be a problem?
- 📝 Does an Arahant or Buddha still like music they liked as a lay person?
- 📝 How does one know that he's reached a Jhana level in Metta meditation?
- 📝 Does any Mahayana school teach that I am atman?
- 📝 Does an Arahant accumulate kamma in his/her life?
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever refute the view of "extreme metaphysical nihilism" e.g. a view that "nothing is real"?
- 📝 Buddhists advise against "me and mine" does that include times?
- 📝 How does rebirth fit with the fact that everything is impermanent?
- 📝 Does Vajrayana accept the idea that Buddha placed Lord Yama (a supposed Bodhisattva) in charge of the hell realms to ensure karmic retribution?
- 📝 Does Avalokiteshvara speak through the Buddha in the Heart Sutra? Or how is it that Avalokiteshvara speaks to Shariputra?
- 📝 Does enlightenment in all teachings amount to a progressively deeper realisation that I am already enlightened?
- 📝 What does "heard" mean in "I allow fish and meat that is pure in three respects: One has not seen, heard, or suspected..."
- 📝 Who is ignorant and when does one realize that one is ignorant?
- 📝 Does any buddhist school, extant or otherwise, say that there is no svabhava what-so-ever?
- 📝 Where does it say that venerable Moggallana got lost in space?
- 📝 Does an Arahant yawn? Or: What are the characteristics of the Noble Ones: Sotāpanna, Sakadāgāmi, Anāgāmi and Arahant?
- 📝 In which sutta does a lay disciple of the Buddha tell a non-buddhist mendicant that he has experienced jhana?
- 📝 Does 'karma' mean that everything that happens to us is under our control, or only that we are responsible for it?
- 📝 Does there exist a Pali Canon sutta that claims that a Bodhisattva can only be a male Brahmin or Kshatriya? If yes, is it possibly apocryphal?
- 📝 Was it ever stated that monks can’t show their psychic powers to lay people?
- 📝 The Buddha spoke to many individuals. Did the Buddha ever tell an individual who did not believe in rebirth, that they must in order to be liberated?
- 📝 ...or does it mean that the conditions might also dependant on a or all things?