What are 'suttas of indirect meaning' in the Pali canon?
score:4
From Neyyattha Sutta (A 2.3):
Bhikshus, there are these two who misrepresent the Tathagata. What are the two? Those who explain a sutta whose sense is direct as indirect. Those who explain a sutta whose sense is indirect as direct. These, bhikshus, are the two who misrepresent the Tathagata.
Examples of provisional teachings from Dharmafarer's analysis of Neyyattha Nītattha Sutta:
Those suttas or teachings that tell stories, describe ritual acts, or that talk of “beings,” “gods,” etc, need to have their meaning drawn out (neyyattha), as they do not directly refer to true reality.
Certain passages in the Mahā Parinibbāna Sutta (D 16) and related texts, for example, refer to a post-Buddha non-Buddhist situation, reminiscent of strategic placement or geomancy.
"offering to the devas" as mentioned in the Ādiya Sutta (A 5.41)
The Nandamātā Sutta (A 7.50) gives an account of dedication of merit to the deva Vessavaṇa.
"Dedicating merit" is a provisional teaching. The point is clear that merit is non-negotiable and non-transferable, as stated in the Nidhikaṇḍa Sutta (Khp 8).
From interview with Ven. Bhikkhu K. Ñānananda ("comments on the Neyyattha Sutta, which seems to have been the seed out of which the Two Truths doctrine has been developed"):
The traditional interpretation, as you get in the commentaries, is very simple: it says neyyattha would be such suttas where the ordinary concepts of beings etc. come in, but nītattha is where you get anicca, dukkha, anattā. That’s a very simple definition of it.
There’s just a flux of life, a functioning, but no agent in it. But the language requires both. That is why we have to say ‘it rains’, leaving the room for someone to ask ‘what is this ‘it’?’. The fire goes out: where has it ‘gone’? The Buddha from time to time had to show the absurdity of such questions. In such contexts you come across the nītattha.
For all practical purposes, the Buddha’s words are enough. But for those who do not practice, but who are armchair critics, there is so much contradiction in the Buddha’s words. Sometimes He says there is dukkha only, and sometimes He says you are suffering. This is also the reason why there is such a mess...
From Early Buddhist Teaching and Abhidhamma by ven. Tezaniya
neyyattha suttas are, for example: „O monk, there is one individual, there are two individuals, there are three individuals" etc.
nītattha sutta is „this is impermanent, this is sorrowful, this is soulless.“
From Wikipedia:
According to Vasumitra, the Bahuśrutīyas considered the Buddha's teachings of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, anātman, and Nirvāṇa to be supramundane, while his expositions on other subjects were to be considered mundane.
From Maha-cattarisaka Sutta:
"And what is right view? Right view, I tell you, is of two sorts: There is right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions [of becoming]; there is right view that is noble, without effluents, transcendent, a factor of the path.
"And what is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions? 'There is what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions. There is this world & the next world. There is mother & father. There are spontaneously reborn beings; there are contemplatives & brahmans who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly known & realized it for themselves.' This is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions.
"And what is the right view that is noble, without effluents, transcendent, a factor of the path? The discernment, the faculty of discernment, the strength of discernment, analysis of qualities [in terms of the four noble truths].
Upvote:1
This idea of indirect and direct sutras is itself misleading. I found a book, "Nāgārjuna and the Philosophy of Openness" which claims that the buddha himself never made exactly such a distinction but that such distinctions seem valid on the basis that the Buddha said that there were some words and phrases which he used without being led astray by them. But as far as I can tell these indirect and direct phrases are present consistently throughout all sutras. The diamond sutra for example, is full of direct meaning like there is really no object that is why it is called "object", but references "I" many times. At the beginning Thus I have heard, taken literally would contradict the later assertion that there is no I.
I think some people are reading too seriously, mostly the sutras are intended to be a helpful expedient to enlightenment.
Everything that is read whether it is from a sutra or not will be interpreted by the reader which will cast a different shadow on the meaning. It is often that the original intent of the author is lost to the readers especially after a lot of time has passed and the language has changed. So it is no surprise that the texts contain expedients that look like they are literal, which led to a schism where some people interpreted sections literally while others did not. And then people started categorising sections of text into direct and indirect or higher and lower.
I highly doubt that there really is a sutra "of indirect meaning" in that all of it is intended to be further analysed nor a sutra "of direct meaning".
Upvote:1
The suttas appear to state there are no 'indirect meanings', as follows:
Monks, this Teaching that is so well proclaimed by me...is plain, open, explicit and free of patchwork...MN 22
~~~
I have set forth the Dhamma without making any distinction of esoteric and exoteric doctrine; there is nothing, Ananda, with regard to the teachings that the Tathagata holds to the last with the closed fist of a teacher who keeps some things back....DN 16
The matter of 'neyyattha' is touched upon in the following commentary:
The Awakened One, best of speakers, Spoke two kinds of truths: The conventional and the ultimate. A third truth does not obtain. Therein:
The speech wherewith the world converses is true, on account of its being agreed upon by the world. The speech which describes what is ultimate is also true, characterizing dhammas as they really are.
Therefore, being skilled in common usage, False speech does not arise in the Teacher, Who is Lord of the World, When he speaks according to conventions.
Mn. i. 95
In my opinion, the inferred "conventional truth" referred to above is not really a complete "truth" because, as stated, it is not "characterizing dhammas as they really are." Instead, it is a worldly interpretation that maintains the worldly (moral & kammic) efficacy or truth of those teachings.
Here, the 'neyyattha' appears to particularly refer to the 'rebirth' teachings. Ordinary people read words such as 'birth' ('jati'); 'death' ('marana'); 'worlds' ('loka') & 'kaya' ('body'; 'collection'; 'group') & immediately 'infer' a physical meaning (instead of examining how these words are actually defined & used in the supramundane suttas).
However, as stated, when ordinary people use 'neyyattha', the karmic efficacy or reality (truth) is retained, namely, it is correctly understood kamma (intentional action) made in the present has a future consequence or result. That ordinary people believe there will be consequences after the termination of life does not change the efficacy of those teachings because those teachings were given, not for the purpose of enlightenment, but for the purpose of nurturing non-harming, morality or 'merit' (as stated in MN 117).
And what is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions? 'There is what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions. There is this world & the other worlds. There is mother & father. There are spontaneously born beings; there are contemplatives & brahmans who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the others after having directly known & realized it for themselves.' This is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions.
MN 117
More post
- 📝 Did Buddha saw his two teachers were born, where living beings did not have physical body?
- 📝 Hypocrisy of Buddhism
- 📝 Itipiso Chanting
- 📝 Why don't we realise space instead of Nibbana?
- 📝 Is it possible to have awareness without a self-sense?
- 📝 Justifications for why there are no mentions of Nirodha Samapatti in the earliest stratum of the Pali canon?
- 📝 What is the exact Age Limit that Buddha can live?
- 📝 Why is there even a way to the end of suffering?
- 📝 Plants may be sentient beings like animals so how do you decide what to eat?
- 📝 How do you tell a 4-year-old who the Buddha was?
- 📝 What is the real "Human Realm"
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever talk about his family?
- 📝 Atthakalap and atta vs mind vs Brahma state
- 📝 Benefits of five precepts
- 📝 What should you do when someone teaches false Dharma?
- 📝 Possible Potential Buddhist
- 📝 What type of Buddhist monks are only allowed to eat two meals per day and why?
- 📝 How can I smile when existence itself is dukkha?
- 📝 Significance of Three Customs Involving String
- 📝 Confused about partner's practices. Need advice
- 📝 What is Completion Stage Meditation also known as Nispannakrama?
- 📝 Losing mindfulness and peace after three weeks of successful practise
- 📝 How to avoid doing things that suck the energy out of you?
- 📝 Is Anapanasati a complete path? Does it, by itself, lead to nirvana?
- 📝 Are there any recollections of past lives in the more grievous realms?
- 📝 Doubt regarding correct meditation technique
- 📝 Is it bad karma if you say something that turns out to be false?
- 📝 Is Mind in Buddhism connected to Brain (the physical organ)?
- 📝 Meditation posture and language as a monk in Thailand
- 📝 I've attained jhana literally once, should I try to pursue it further or just live a decent householder life?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 What are 'suttas of indirect meaning' in the Pali canon?
- 📝 What are the Pali translations for mindfulness?
- 📝 Which suttas in the Pali canon are relatively early or late?
- 📝 Are there any references in the Pali canon to the experience of death?
- 📝 What are the Pali or Sanskrit words for these things?
- 📝 What concordances are there for the Pali Canon?
- 📝 What are the most common ways to enable keyboards to type Pali characters in 2021?
- 📝 What Pali and English words are translations of the Norwegian words for ‘reality’?
- 📝 What are Pali terms (and sutta references) for the 3 opposites, 3 doors, and 3 gifts, which are associated with the 3 characteristics of existence?
- 📝 Where in the Pali Canon are there Discussions on Reanimated Corpse?
- 📝 What does the Pali canon say about "death"?
- 📝 Are Samatha and Vipassana mentioned in the Pali Canon as different styles/techniques of meditation?
- 📝 What are the differences between vipassana and mindfulness meditation?
- 📝 What are the common buddhist practices to eliminate sleepiness?
- 📝 What are the differences/similarities in the concept of faith as used in Buddhism and Christianity?
- 📝 What are the texts that contain words which can be attributed directly to the Buddha?
- 📝 What are the scientifically proven benefits of mindfulness meditation?
- 📝 What are the other Theravada Councils held between the 4th and 6th
- 📝 What are the Four Noble Truths?
- 📝 What are the differences between "Nirvana" in Buddhism and "Moksha" in Hinduism?
- 📝 What are the main schools of Tibetan Buddhism?
- 📝 What are the three marks of existence?
- 📝 What are the main arguments in favor of the Anātman view over the Ātman view?
- 📝 What are the Core Teachings of Buddhism?
- 📝 Are there examples of the Buddha showing humour in the Pali Canon?
- 📝 What are the Four Immeasurables (aka Four Noble Abodes)?
- 📝 What are the salient differences between the Pāḷi Nikāyas & Chinese Āgamas?
- 📝 What are the advantages/disadvantages of meditating with eyes closed?
- 📝 Where to get the Pali Canon in Pali?
- 📝 Any instance in the pali canon where a sotāpanna born as a human?