If the Buddha praised Samatha, why is it losing importance?
Upvote:0
What the Buddha said and encouraged may not be totally clear from reading the texts based on oral traditions that were eventually written down. Perhaps they were all recommended by the Buddha at one time or another and the ones that were most comfortable in a particular Buddhist tradition became emphasized over time.
Why not say Buddha encouraged Zen? Some Zen practitioners say Buddha was the first Zen master from the text of the Flower sermon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flower_Sermon
the Chan tradition may have invented or written down the flower sermon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chan_Buddhism#Kasyappa_and_The_Flower_Sermon
The Chan tradition ascribes the origins of Chan in India to the Flower Sermon, the earliest source for which comes from the 14th century.[36] It is said that Gautama Buddha gathered his disciples one day for a Dharma talk. When they gathered together, the Buddha was completely silent and some speculated that perhaps the Buddha was tired or ill. The Buddha silently held up and twirled a flower and his eyes twinkled; several of his disciples tried to interpret what this meant, though none of them were correct. One of the Buddha's disciples, Mahākāśyapa, silently gazed at the flower and broke into a broad smile. The Buddha then acknowledged Mahākāśyapa's insight by saying the following:[21]
I possess the true Dharma eye, the marvelous mind of Nirvāṇa, the true form of the formless, the subtle Dharma gate that does not rest on words or letters but is a special transmission outside of the scriptures. This I entrust to Mahākāśyapa.
The diversity of examples seems to be coincidentally an advocacy for the particular tradition that promotes a certain quality or story. It is perhaps no surprise that human consciousness would lend an interpretation that is more appealing and easier to live with. If such are the traditions, perhaps our best hope for liberation is to follow the example of the Buddha and live our lives to the greatest extent possible serving others as best we are suited.
Upvote:11
The Pali canon and commentaries do indeed carry considerable encouragement to practice the jhanas. The distinction between samatha and vipassanā aren't really spelled out in the original teachings and it was only much later that the doctrine of the two as separate (and separate-ableon) meditation practices arose. By the time of Buddhaghosa (5th century AD) the distinction was pretty firmly established, though some later teachers dismiss the distinction as unnecessary. Ajahn Chah of the Thai Forest tradition liked to say that samatha and vipassanā are like two ends of a stick - when you pick up the stick, both ends come along See Ajahn Chah's essay on this from his book, "Unshakable Peace".
The emphasis on vipassanā which one finds nowadays came about for very practical and pragmatic reasons, but this topic as a bit much to delve into deeply here. The brief overview is that a method was needed that could be undertaken by a lay meditator on a 30 day retreat and provide the practitioner with a reasonable shot at arriving at the first stage of enlightenment - stream entry. Ven. Mahasi Sayadaw is perhaps the main exponent of this method and it seems to work quite well for many people. In contrast to this, to properly develop "Visuddhimagga-style" jhanas is beyond the reach of most lay people (and most monastics) not least because of the time commitment necessary.
There's more to the story of course, but that's a thumbnail sketch of the situation.
More post
- 📝 Would 10 days Vipassana a waste of time, if not practised afterwards?
- 📝 How can there be knowledge of unconditioned phenomenon without any knower?
- 📝 Are the Sins in dreams, sins?
- 📝 When will a Buddhist accept doing analysis?
- 📝 Is there a historical connection between Buddhism and martial arts?
- 📝 Are there communities of practicing secular Buddhists?
- 📝 How did Mahayan, Hinayan,Vajrayana come into Buddhism?
- 📝 Is the path an individual journey?
- 📝 Wallace's samatha practice, based on Padmasambhava: Am I doing it right?
- 📝 Is it correct to say that 'one who craves for ...' and imply existence of self?
- 📝 What community activities do monks in southest asia take part in?
- 📝 Can the same kamma cetana and action lead to somewhat different future physical consequences (the physical aspect of the kamma-vipaka)
- 📝 "The result of kamma is of three sorts, I tell you" - Are the "sorts" explicated anywhere in the canon?
- 📝 If someone have experienced supernatural abilities through meditation, than why don't he shows it to world?
- 📝 Dhamma and Buddha Dhamma
- 📝 What is the definition of passa ?
- 📝 How to experience Karma?
- 📝 Is clinging the reason for losing interest towards certain things?
- 📝 What language did the Buddha speak?
- 📝 Why aren't more people interested in Dhamma?
- 📝 Buddhist thought on Amends
- 📝 What does pari-mukha mean in 16 APS anapana sati?
- 📝 How bad is the karma of feeding meat to your children?
- 📝 What is the meaning of uppajjati versus upapajjati?
- 📝 Devas' Mortality
- 📝 Does anyone have High resolution Buddha wallpapers for computer?
- 📝 What is MN 116 ( paccekabuddha sutta) about?
- 📝 According to Buddhism, how can a woman get a male soul?
- 📝 Impermanence is Buddha nature / Buddha nature is impermanence
- 📝 If A is killed by B due to A's past karma of killing B, will B suffer from this karma of killing A?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 If the Buddha praised Samatha, why is it losing importance?
- 📝 Why did the Buddha suffer before he died?
- 📝 Why does the Buddha call himself the Tathāgata?
- 📝 Attachment is a poison. Why is attachment to the Buddha and to Buddhist philosophy not a problem?
- 📝 Why the Buddha didn't originally allow ordination of women
- 📝 Why is the Buddha described as trackless?
- 📝 Why does the Buddha always answer a question if asked three times?
- 📝 If there is no soul or self, why did the Buddha speak of his past lives?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe that the Buddha was enlightened, despite that he claimed it himself?
- 📝 Where's the story in which the Buddha praised a non-returner for keeping the knowledge of his attainment private?
- 📝 Why did the Buddha touch the earth at his enlightenment?
- 📝 Why did physical representations of the Buddha only start to appear a few centuries after his death?
- 📝 Why do some English-language texts refer to the Buddha as "Lord"?
- 📝 Why Buddha didn't want him to be called 'friend' by the monks?
- 📝 Iconography in Buddhism - from the Greeks? And why isn't the Buddha bald?
- 📝 Why would the Buddha refrain from instructing?
- 📝 Why does the Buddha appear androgynous in some depictions?
- 📝 There is a text where Buddha says that the Dharma he teaches is not a secret doctrine so why are there sects which maintain secrecy?
- 📝 The Buddha is said to have rediscovered the ancient path. Why was it lost to begin with?
- 📝 Why did the Buddha contradict about His teachings in these two different suttas?
- 📝 What's the role of the detailed descriptions of the other planes of existence? Why it was important for the Buddha to tell them?
- 📝 Why did the Lord Buddha criticize natthikavādaṃ (moral nihilism)?
- 📝 Why did Buddha use the 'Raft Simile'?
- 📝 why the disciples of the buddha introduced the buddism?
- 📝 Why the Buddha abandoned asceticism
- 📝 Why are exceptionally tall statues of the Buddha and Guanyin built?
- 📝 Why does the Buddha blame Ananda asking him to remain living forever?
- 📝 Why Buddha lined up four brahmavihara in the chronological order 'metta, karuna, mudita and upeksha'
- 📝 Why did the Buddha teach how to escape Samsara if there is no soul?
- 📝 Why did the Buddha not answer Vacchagotta (SN 44.10), but did answer the monks (MN 140)?