Difficulty letting go of attachment

score:1

Accepted answer

I went through a similar process with attachments, particularly with friends and family. The pull of the mind can be quite strong around people, but it is more that the mind is drawn to inner conflict of one sort or another, rather than the situation or source of attachment itself.

I'm guessing the underlying narrative might be something like, "what will they think of me if I cancel?" - and there within lies the conflict born of upholding a particular kind of identity.

For me, I would often throw caution to the wind, remove myself from the mind's torment, and make a damn decision. Sometimes I looked like a fool - ah, so what! Humility dissolves the ego.

Upvote:-2

If you have invited friends, then you are a host. Skillful hosts are hospitable:

AN7.70:1.10: A mendicant should honor and respect and rely on hospitality, to give up the unskillful and develop the skillful.”

The Buddha also teaches two kinds of hospitality:

AN2.152:1.1: β€œThere are these two kinds of hospitality.
AN2.152:1.2: What two?
AN2.152:1.3: Hospitality in material things and hospitality in the teaching.
AN2.152:1.4: These are the two kinds of hospitality.
AN2.152:1.5: The better of these two kinds of hospitality is hospitality in the teaching.”

Hospitality in the teaching is good because:

SN3.18:4.3: Good friends, companions, and associates are the whole of the spiritual life.

Notice that the Buddha clearly emphasizes good friends as the whole of the spiritual life. So we should all be skillful hosts to good friends.

Upvote:0

SN3.18:4.3 refers to a supreme noble type of friendship, as follows:

Good friends, companions and associates are the whole of the spiritual life. A monk with good friends, companions and associates can expect to develop and cultivate the noble eightfold path.

Per AN 3.114, it is extremely rare to find the above type of supreme noble friend in the world.

DN 31 refers to false friends & true friends as follows:

These four, young householder, should be understood as foes in the guise of friends:

  1. he who appropriates a friend's possessions, namely, (i) he appropriates his friend's wealth, (ii) he gives little and asks much, (iii) he does his duty out of fear, (iv) he associates for his own advantage.
  2. he who renders lip-service, namely, (i) he makes friendly profession as regards the past, (ii) he makes friendly profession as regards the future, (iii) he tries to gain one's favor by empty words, (iv) when opportunity for service has arisen, he expresses his inability.
  3. he who flatters, namely, (i) he approves of his friend's evil deeds, (ii) he disapproves his friend's good deeds, (iii) he praises him in his presence, (iv) he speaks ill of him in his absence.
  4. he who brings ruin, namely, (i) he is a companion in indulging in intoxicants that cause infatuation and heedlessness, (ii) he is a companion in sauntering in streets at unseemly hours, (iii) he is a companion in frequenting theatrical shows, (iv) he is a companion in indulging in gambling which causes heedlessness."

These four, young householder, should be understood as warm-hearted friends:

  1. he who is a helpmate, namely, (i) he guards the heedless, (ii) he protects the wealth of the heedless, (iii) he becomes a refuge when you are in danger, (iv) when there are commitments he provides you with double the supply needed.
  2. he who is the same in happiness and sorrow, namely, (i) he reveals his secrets, (ii) he conceals one's own secrets, (iii) in misfortune he does not forsake one, (iv) his life even he sacrifices for one's sake.
  3. he who gives good counsel, namely, (i) he restrains one from doing evil, (ii) he encourages one to do good, (iii) he informs one of what is unknown to oneself, (iv) he points out the path to heaven.
  4. he who sympathises, namely, (i) he does not rejoice in one's misfortune, (ii) he rejoices in one's prosperity, (iii) he restrains others speaking ill of oneself, (iv) he praises those who speak well of oneself

While sufficient information has not been provided, in the situation of the questioner, an impression or speculation arises the questioner fears the conduct of his/her friends may not be in harmony with his/her spiritual lifestyle. If this is true, it follows these types of friends are 'false friends' from a Buddhist perspective.

The above said, due to our past, most of us have such 'friends'. We should learn to establish appropriate boundaries with such 'friends'. We generally don't cut them off but we are clear we don't engage in their unwholesome lifestyle.

In summary, we can/should use the criteria from DN 31 to examine whether our 'friends' are true friends, false friends or a combination of both. This will help us determine our degree & manner of association with them.

More post

Search Posts

Related post