In which situation is the broadside more preferable than every gun firing on their own time?
score:14
Accepted answer
Using Aubrey/Maturin, beefed up with "Naval life in the time of Aubrey and Maturin" type texts:
- Shock and Awe. Few men died in most naval battles in the age of sail. Morale failure was a key structure in battle. Broadsides significantly reduced the numbers of boarders in a single wave. Three fast broadsides and board was an ideal to secure a prize by intimidating the opposing crew out of combat. Most boarding combats ended by flight below decks by the losing crew. This was a sign of surrender and an end to combat.
- Aimed fire. Naval broadsides were more capable of achieving specific aims, such as dismasting, sail damage, or hull damage. This is due to roll, pitch, limited windows of opportunity.
- Simultaneous damage. Wooden ships tended to resist damage fairly well. A second ball exploiting damage created by the first would be greatly advantageous.
- Avoiding hull damage. Rippling broadsides guaranteed the stress factors that hulls would take. Fire at will could involve multiple bordering cannons firing simultaneously based on a gun captain's judgement.
However, broadsides weren't always optimal:
- Chasers were regularly fired at will, this is because "the chase" involved attempts to damage specific components, where the advantage of component damage coming sooner would be immeasurable. Chasers were also usually fired in small groups, so the advantages of massed fire weren't present.
- Pitched close battle. In these circumstances broadsides broke down anyway, when ships of the line were engaged closely toppled guns, fire, deaths, chaos, blood and muck any semblance of order in fire broke down.
- Aimed individual fire for purpose. If a particular gun layer was perceived to be effective, at longer ranges, then a ship with the weather gauge and speed could attempt to selectively disable a potential prize. For instance, it might fire at the masts, attempting to dismast or partially dismast an adversary, such that they would be forced to surrender as the aggressor could then rake their length with fire.
Upvote:2
"Guns firing on their own" may be a better tactic, particularly at the beginning of the battle, when what matters is the total rate of fire.
Broadsides are better when the order of the day is for concentrated fire. That usually happens later in the battle, when the idea is to do something decisive, or achieve "critical mass."
A broadside is better when the broadside is enough to sink the key enemy ship. In this case, you want to get off your broadside before he gets off his. First one to put out concentrated fire wins.
As pointed out in other answers, a broadside works best (to get the enemy to lower their heads and fire), when preparing to board an enemy ship. Also, the shock of concentrated (broadside) fire has a greater impact on enemy morale, even if "guns firing on their on their own" objectively does more damage.
More post
- 📝 When Hitler started WW2, did he realize that if he lost he would die?
- 📝 How was the British invasion into the US successful in the War of 1812?
- 📝 Which country ruled Flanders in the 16th century?
- 📝 Did the Nazi Army have a telephone conversation pattern?
- 📝 Did Columbus really never know he reached a new continent?
- 📝 Was Baker Island ever claimed by the United Kingdom?
- 📝 Absolute rulers who voluntarily resigned their power
- 📝 When did the Romans begin using the sword, as opposed to the axe, for decapitation?
- 📝 Are there ancient historical sources which have been permanently lost?
- 📝 Could Magna Graeca have expanded beyond the Mediterranean sea region?
- 📝 Is there any truth to my family's story about "Cooper's Pie Wagon"?
- 📝 When was the American War of Independence first called a 'Revolution'?
- 📝 Was Switzerland really impossible to invade during WW2?
- 📝 Was the Kerensky Offensive doomed from the start?
- 📝 What place was called [in Latin] Audomaropolitanus?
- 📝 What led Guderian as far south as Gomel, in August, 1941?
- 📝 In the British empire, what was the difference between a Governor General and a Viceroy?
- 📝 What happened to Soviet POWs taken by non-German armies on WW2 Eastern front?
- 📝 How efficient was the (Cold War) Red Scare?
- 📝 What were the achievements of the temperance movement?
- 📝 Is there any myth in Thucydides?
- 📝 Why is German spoken in Upper Valais?
- 📝 Is Jacques Le Goff's statement about medieval labor mechanization not leading to qualitative progress true?
- 📝 How do Tamahagane, Damascus, and Toledo Steel compare?
- 📝 When was the first airborne combat drop?
- 📝 What were English 'rules restricting marriage'?
- 📝 Why did India sign the Indo-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation?
- 📝 Did Karl Marx openly advocate violence? (or against it?)
- 📝 Are there any examples of single combat between kings/generals ending a war?
- 📝 What primary sources are there for Charles I's seizure of gold from the Tower mint?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 In which situation is the broadside more preferable than every gun firing on their own time?
- 📝 Why were so many more Jewish men than Jewish women killed during the Holocaust?
- 📝 Is it true that there are more slaves in the world now than ever at one point in history?
- 📝 Why was sugar cultivation more profitable in the Caribbean/Brazil than West Africa?
- 📝 Why did baseball become more popular than cricket in the USA?
- 📝 Why do land mines seem to be a more serious problem in the Balkans than the Alps?
- 📝 Were there any Roman villas in Britain which were used rather than destroyed after the Romans left?
- 📝 Why were the Prague Spring leaders treated more leniently than Nagy and his colleagues?
- 📝 Since the inception of the United States, has the term "America" ever referred to something more than simply "the United States"?
- 📝 During feudalism in Europe, was one's allegiance to the lord more or less important than the allegiance to the king?
- 📝 Did more Jews live in Poland than any other country, prior to the Holocaust, because of how Polish laws and people regarded Jews?
- 📝 At the Battle of Zama, was the Roman army more "native" than the Carthaginian?
- 📝 How did the Catholic Pope manage to become more powerful than Kings in old Europe?
- 📝 Did the Tlingits benefit from resisting the Russians more than other Alaskan tribes?
- 📝 How did the South USA become more overtly Christian than the North?
- 📝 Why was ancient Christianity more successful than the Roman pantheon and Judaism in gaining followers?
- 📝 Was the Macedonian phalanx more effective than hoplites?
- 📝 Why does the parish register show more baptisms than burials?
- 📝 Were East Germans more acquiescent to Soviet domination than the rest of Eastern Europe and if so, why?
- 📝 Which of LBJ's fellow representatives were less active than him in the House?
- 📝 Why does Brazil have many more Italian descendants than the U.S. or Argentina when the latter two received more Italian immigrants?
- 📝 When did the Royal Navy start to fill a given rank of admiral with more than one officer?
- 📝 Why did the price of eggs in Britain increase much more than for other basic foods during WWI?
- 📝 Did liberalism in the USA degenerate into something more totalitarian than liberal?
- 📝 Did the USSR have a more positive relationship with France than other west european countries after 1945?
- 📝 During the 1850’s and 60’s, was the free North (and its cause in the U.S. Civil War) considered more virtuous than the slave-holding South?
- 📝 Did the US military just kill more Russians in Syria than they ever did during the Cold War?
- 📝 Why was agriculture more conducive to slavery in U.S. South than the North?
- 📝 Was the 1939 Red Army more disciplined / better behaved than the 1943-1945 Red Army?
- 📝 Were some groups in the Soviet Union more likely to collaborate with the Germans than others?