Was it viable to continue the battle of France in the French colonies in 1940?
score:6
tl;dr: not really.
Viable to whom?
To you and me? Sure: we know who won in the end, and we risk nothing, having been born long after the war.
To Churchill? Sure: he was committed to fighting to the end, and he would have welcomed any help.
But for a french soldier? No. The year is 1940. Germany seems unbeatable: it was starved into a defeat in WW1 by the naval blockade, but this time Russia is clearly on the German side - a friendly non-combatant if not an outright ally, supplying Germany with food and materiel. Your family is either in the occupied part of France or in the Vichy zone; either way you put them in harms way and you will be branded a traitor, not a hero. When the Germany inevitably wins and you fight for the wrong side, you will never be able to go home.
Besides, fight for what? For Poland? For the Jews? (Hitler always defined his war as "the war on jews").
So, very few people followed de Gaulle.
This attitude was sealed by the Attack on Mers-el-Kébir that
was almost universally condemned in France and resentment festered for years over what was considered a betrayal by their former ally
What was viable?
French Navy was huge and vitally important to both sides. Churchill even offered to release France from the obligation not to make a separate peace (signed in March 1940) in exchange for the ships, or to create a Franco-British Union State.
So, if the French gave their ships to Britain (with or without sailors), that would have been an important development for the anti-nazi alliance (which at that moment consisted of Britain and a bunch of governments in exile in London).
Materiel
Of course, the French colonial industrial resources were virtually non-existent, but that was not the issue: the French would have been supplied by Britain and the US. In fact, the aforementioned Attack on Mers-el-Kébir was intended, in part, to demonstrate to the US that Britain was committed to the war with Germany and that the American aid will never fall into German hands. Thus, if the French navy joined the British (the French overseas ground forces were relatively insignificant - and it is unlikely that many troops agreed to evacuating from Europe to Africa to keep fighting, see above), both "Arsenal of Democracy" and Lend-Lease would have probably came earlier.
The French had the capacity to keep fighting, at least on the high seas, what they lacked was will.
Upvote:1
Yes, pursuing fight from French colonies was viable. The "proof" for that is that some of those colonies rallied to French Free Forces and fought other French colonies that were "loyal" to Vichy.
Now, the question is: What would be the consequences?
The problem with continuing the fight has two sides:
First side is that the French metropolitan territory would be under total German occupation, thus the population would be affected differently. How and how much? I won't go into deeper consideration, because there are plenty of debates over that in France. The thing is that this would be a consequence.
What interests us here is the evolution of strategic situation. Here comes the second side of the problem: With France still fighting, the Germans would have had to consider that the fight is not over. Their involvement in Africa, alongside Italy, would have been earlier and stronger. This could be of crucial importance for the Allies.
But French forces in the colonies would have been as well by themselves a consequence: could they compensate more involvement of Germany on Mediterranean and African theaters?
My answer is Yes:
- On the ground, there were plenty of good units able to win over the Italiens and help the British against the Germa,s
- On the sea, French fleet would be a decisive help to kill, and not just contain, the Italian fleet and thus to defend Malta
- In the air, French contribution would have been less important
Thus, speaking of the strategic situation in 1940, continuing the fight from the colonies (with the hypothesis of full commitment and not divisions in French colonies) would have helped in fighting the Axis on the Mediterranean theater, so much that more German involvement might reduce their hability to attack Greece, USSR, and so on. Also, French involvement in the battle of Atlantic should be considered.
In Asia, Indochina would probably not change the course of the war a lot. Only thing: Japan could not invade until Pearl Harbour, and thus the attack of Malaysia and Burma are delayed of a few weeks.
More post
- 📝 Why didn't Alexander invade India?
- 📝 What's the difference between Khan and Taishi/Taisha?
- 📝 Was the date skip of the Gregorian calender reform understood to skip weekdays accordingly?
- 📝 What was the goal behind the 9 state approval of the United States constitution?
- 📝 On 15 October 1810 the 92nd Regiment were billeted in ruined houses at Crozendera, Portugal. Can anyone pinpoint this location?
- 📝 When did humans understand the science of hail?
- 📝 Was it true that Nelson Mandela refused to renounce violence while in Prison?
- 📝 Al Khazneh in Petra: is it fake?
- 📝 Is there any historical evidence to support the existence of the Patriarchs outside of the Old Testament?
- 📝 Why was the Bay of Pigs invasion unsuccessful?
- 📝 How were the Big Four compensated when British Rail was formed?
- 📝 Was "Street" more common than the abbreviated "St." in pre-1910 American newspapers?
- 📝 Was Classic Mayan civilization really so gruesome?
- 📝 What is the origin of US south region white people?
- 📝 Which historic figure does William Bolitho refer to with "The greatest adventurer that ever lived ended as a nervous, banal millionaire"?
- 📝 Why did the Allied attack at Gallipoli fail during WWI?
- 📝 How likely was an enlisted man to have fought at both Falkirk and Bannockburn?
- 📝 What other ships were with USS Saratoga when it was hit by a torpedo on 1942 Jan 11?
- 📝 How was law enforcement handled in large US cities before professional police?
- 📝 Bretton Woods System : The Meaning as International Monetary System
- 📝 Did Boris Belousov join in his brother's conspiracy to kill the Emperor?
- 📝 Why were Arians outnumbered on the First Council of Nicaea?
- 📝 Legal grounds of functioning of Third Reich concentration camps
- 📝 From where did Aryans originate?
- 📝 Why did Pakistan get involved in Soviet-Afghan war from 1979 to 1989?
- 📝 Racism, or Nationalism, represented in 19th century English Wills?
- 📝 State-sanctioned historical "truth"
- 📝 Were armed merchantmen effective against submarines?
- 📝 How did Rome's legal system work?
- 📝 Explosive Ordinance Yield Over History
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was it viable to continue the battle of France in the French colonies in 1940?
- 📝 At the Battle of Augusta, how did the French learn that de Ruyter was mortally wounded?
- 📝 In the French Empire, what was the difference between french colonies éphémèras and comptoirs français?
- 📝 Which battle was the most lopsided result in terms of casualties?
- 📝 Was the tugboat ever part of a WWII battle group?
- 📝 Was there an assassination attempt against Xerxes in the battle of Thermopylae?
- 📝 How difficult was to escape from a naval battle after engaging into one during the Age of Sail?
- 📝 Was there really a navy officer named Picard at the Battle of Trafalgar?
- 📝 Why did the Dutch, French & British acquire minor colonies in South America?
- 📝 What was the first battle in history fought by vast-majority-% "distance-shooting" non-mechanized force?
- 📝 What was the last battle fought mainly by sail-powered ships?
- 📝 What was the first successful mass tank battle of WW1?
- 📝 What was this small state in the south of France in 1789?
- 📝 Why did few French and no Dutch pilots (but many Poles and Czechs) take part in the Battle of Britain?
- 📝 Why was the last battle of the War of 1812 fought fully half a year after the official end of the war?
- 📝 How common was it for un-documented ships to bring settlers to the American colonies 1700-1750
- 📝 Was the Battle of Tours really the turning point for the Umayyad expansion into Europe?
- 📝 Why was slavery profitable in the Southern colonies and not New England?
- 📝 Who was Richard of York at the Battle of Grunwald?
- 📝 Why did the Allies lose the Battle of France (1940)?
- 📝 How did slavery become permissible in the French West Indies when it was forbidden in France?
- 📝 At the Battle of Zama, was the Roman army more "native" than the Carthaginian?
- 📝 How was the dynamics of a naval battle in the 17th century?
- 📝 How was the naval battle of Guadalcanal affected by Japanese ships loading High Explosive shells rather than Armor Piercing?
- 📝 What was the actual cause of the disaster for the Royal Navy’s battlecruisers in the Battle of Jutland?
- 📝 When was the earliest recorded battle with the usage of gunpowder as an offensive weapon?
- 📝 Battle of Xiaoting: was Shu's invasion doomed from the start?
- 📝 Between the 7 Years War and 1776, was there any effort to have the colonies represented in Parliament?
- 📝 Was there a massacre in the Algerian war calculated to provoke French reprisals?
- 📝 What was the significance of the BEF moving into the gap between German forces in First Battle of the Marne?