Why were bridges and tunnels off Manhattan closed to evacuees on 9/11?

Upvote:6

It was precautionary until some sense of scale for the attacks had been determined by U.S. intelligence agencies.

We know now that the four hijacked planes were the entire planned attack - but that was not known at the time. There was widespread fear that, particularly if a nation state was behind the attacks, that there might be additional waves coming. That's why Gander Newfoundland (with a population of just 11,600) found itself hosting over 7,000 stranded airline passengers for an extended period.

enter image description here

The concern would have been that any large conglomeration of people, in an area with walls that could magnify an explosion and predictable as such in advance, was a potential follow-up target. Tunnels, with the possibility of having both ends sealed off, and bridges with the possibility of bringing down the whole road surface, were seen as being particularly inviting possible targets.

Additional details on the response, by the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, are here courtesy of sempaicuba. Also, some links over the East River further north from WTC were kept open (pp 11):

To facilitate evacuation and emergency response the bridges along the East River were open for pedestrians leaving Manhattan and for emergency vehicles entering Manhattan.

More post

Search Posts

Related post