Upvote:0
According to Jung Chang's biography of Empress Cixi, there was no specific involvement of Japanese politics in Chinese revolutionnary movements. However, they did involve in some well established families, as well as in contesting movements, in order to play "double game": If you support the monarchy and its opponents, you are sure to keep contacts in the winning side at the end.
I can give you three examples from Jung Chang:
So you would not say, for the period 1894-1911, that Japan involved specifically in favour or against revolutionnaries, but it did intrigate to know about Chinese governemental decisions and to destabilize it.
Upvote:1
Before about 1931, there was little for the Chinese to "get suspicious" about. As late as World War I or shortly after, Japan even let openly anti-Japanese students study military science in their academies. No one was being played for fools. Everyone was seeking their self interests; the Chinese wanted a better education, and Japan wanted better relations with Chinese people against what was then perceived as the "European" threat. It was only in the 1930s that Japanese and Chinese interests irreversibly diverged. By then, all the major parties had played their hands.
A later version of your question might read, "it seems to me that Japan played Chinese Communists into breaking up the the Kuomintang, in order to expand Japanese power in the region. Were any Chinese Communists suspicious about this happening at the time, or did they more or less get played for fools?"
The Chinese Communists were no fools. They ultimately won what had been a three way fight, with the Nationalists basically being the "odd man out."