How do proponents of the dual nature of man address Hebrews 4:12, "dividing soul and spirit"?
score:3
Proponents of dichotomism argue in two primary ways:
- That the division is between soul and spirit, but that these are simply two aspects of the same thing
- That the division occurs within the soul, and within the spirit, not between them
Between soul and spirit
In his remarks on this passage (Commentary on Hebrews, §222), Thomas Aquinas affirms the dichotomism taught by the church, but nonetheless does not see soul and spirit as synonyms here:
the soul is that to which pertain the powers by which the soul acts in conjunction with the body; whereas the spirit is that to which pertain the powers by which it acts without the body
He connects this understanding the passage as follows:
The Word of God effects and distinguishes between all those divisions and species [...] [The phrase] can be explained according to a Gloss in two ways: so that the soul refers to carnal sins which involve bodily pleasures, such as lust and gluttony; but the spirit refers to spiritual sins, which involve an act of the mind, such as pride, vain glory, and the like. Or by soul is understood evil thoughts, and by spirit good thoughts. Then the sense is this: reaching, i.e., discerning, unto the division of the soul and the spirit, i.e., between carnal and spiritual sins, or between good and evil thoughts.
Within soul and spirit
Other commentators argue that the penetration of the Word of God occurs within both soul and spirit, not to separate them from each other. John Calvin writes:
The word soul means often the same with spirit; but when they occur together, the first includes all the affections, and the second means what they call the intellectual faculty. [...] Now, to come to the passage before us, it is said that God’s word pierces, or reaches to the dividing of soul and spirit, that is, it examines the whole soul of man; for it searches his thoughts and scrutinizes his will with all its desires. (Commentary on Hebrews)
Berkhof argues similarly (ST, 2.1.2.A.2), and Wayne Grudem sees the words as essentially synonomous:
The author is not saying that the Word of God can divide "soul from spirit," but he is using a number of terms [...] that speak of the deep inward parts of our being that are not hidden from the penetrating power of the Word of God. If we wish to call these our "soul," then Scripture pierces into the midst of it and divides it and discovers its inmost intentions. If we wish to call this inmost nonphysical side of our being our "spirit," then Scripture penetrates into the midst of it and divides it and knows its deepest intentions and thoughts. [...] In any case, soul and spirit are not thought of as separate parts; they are simply additional terms for our inmost being. (ST, 479)
Upvote:0
There is also the passage,
May your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ [1 Thessalonians 5:23].
The Orthodox Christian teaching on this - which is aligned with that of the Church Fathers - is that man comprises body and soul; and that the spirit is not distinct from the soul, but is, rather, the highest part of the soul and the faculty which knows God and enters into communion with him. At some point, the Fathers began using the Greek word νοῦς [nous] to refer to spirit in this sense, as distinct from soul - ψυχή [psyche].
The Patristic teaching is summarized in John of Damascus' Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith:
The soul, accordingly, is a living essence, simple, incorporeal, invisible in its proper nature to bodily eyes, immortal, reasoning and intelligent, formless, making use of an organised body, and being the source of its powers of life, and growth, and sensation, and generation, nous being but its purest part and not in any wise alien to it; (for as the eye to the body, so is the nous to the soul) [1]
Other Patristic writers who showed the same understanding of the relation of spirit with soul include Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Gregory of Nyssa, and Ephraim the Syrian.
[1] John Damascene. (1899). An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (S. D. F. Salmond, Trans.). In P. Schaff & H. Wace (Eds.), Vol. 9b: St. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus (P. Schaff & H. Wace, Ed.). A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Second Series (31). New York: Christian Literature Company.
More post
- 📝 Does "Mere Christianity" represent the core of Christian belief?
- 📝 Where did Swedenborg believe man originate from?
- 📝 Did priests ever ordain other priests?
- 📝 Did Isaiah prophesy the countenance of Jesus who was undergoing Passion?
- 📝 What was the hour of the Annunciation?
- 📝 Is interpreting Noah's flood as a civilization-wide event compatible with Roman Catholicism?
- 📝 From an Evangelical perspective, why didn't the resurrected Jesus appear to those who doubted that He was the promised Messiah?
- 📝 Determining literary types in the Bible
- 📝 Under what conditions can a re-married Catholic couple receive the sacrament of the eucharist?
- 📝 Were there any ancient prophets B.C. considered of the same God?
- 📝 Jesus... the word became flesh
- 📝 How is it that an unchanging and omniscient God can have "regret" as He did in Gen 6:7?
- 📝 Matthew 24:15-20, If we can't go back and get our clothes, where are we to go?
- 📝 What is the basis for Theonomy?
- 📝 What word did Jesus use for God in Aramaic?
- 📝 Troubled people showing interest in reading the Bible: how to explain to them that faith is a lifestyle and not an "ATM"?
- 📝 Can dogma ever be modified, and how does this relate to papal infallibility?
- 📝 Why First Epistle to St. John by St. Ignatius of Antioch is considered to be spurious?
- 📝 Did God change from a wrathful God to a loving God between Old Testament and New Testament?
- 📝 Giving a name while doing circumcision?
- 📝 From a Protestant perspective why didn't the Apostles address the problem of deutrocanonical books?
- 📝 What does John 3:13 mean, NO MAN has ASCENDED to heaven?
- 📝 What traditions include "dearly departed" Christians as participants in communion?
- 📝 What is the "fideism" rejected by the Catholic Church?
- 📝 How would Christianity be different if Paul was found to be a Jewish spy?
- 📝 In the book of John, is the Holy Spirit not in Jesus until the dove descends on Him?
- 📝 How does one discern a calling to the vocation of priesthood?
- 📝 Why do some Christains feel the obligation to remove their hats during prayer?
- 📝 What is the basis of the teaching that souls in purgatory can intercede for the living?
- 📝 Which traditions practice paedocommunion?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do proponents of the dual nature of man address Hebrews 4:12, "dividing soul and spirit"?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the idea that salvation once received cannot be lost explain Hebrews 6:4-6 and 10:26-29?
- 📝 How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the Dual Nature of Man as opposed to the Tripartite Nature?
- 📝 How do believers in the tripartite nature of man (body, soul and spirit) explain Jesus' omission of the word "spirit" in Matthew 10:28?
- 📝 How do believers in the tripartite nature of man (body, soul and spirit) reconcile Genesis 2:7, 1 Corinthians 15:44-45 and Matthew 10:28?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Fine Tuning argument for God, refute the puddle comparison?
- 📝 How does Christ's hypostatic union affect the temporal nature of the Trinity?
- 📝 How do proponents of Sola Scriptura choose the "correct" interpretation of a key Bible verse?
- 📝 How do proponents of Apokatastasis deal with the "Everlasting punishment" texts in scripture?
- 📝 How does the Westminster Confession address the paradox of the Bible canon?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 6:19-21 and Luke 6:20-26?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 19:24?
- 📝 How can John the Baptist be the greatest man born of woman, when Jesus was also born of woman?
- 📝 How do protestants understand Jesus' statement that unless we eat the flesh of the Son of Man we will have no life?
- 📝 What traditions believe that a woman's relationship with God must go through some man and how do they support it from the Bible?
- 📝 How did the second Vatican council (aka Vatican II) address the concept of limbo?
- 📝 How do paedobaptists address the argument that infants are incapable of doing what those of Cornelius' household did?
- 📝 Don't the questions of Hebrews 1:5 and 1:13 demand an answer of 'None'? So how can Jehovah's Witnesses say that Jesus is the archangel Michael?
- 📝 How do proponents of the 'Critical Text' respond to the claim that it preserves an anti-Trinitarian corruption dating from the fifth century?
- 📝 How can God be Sovereign (in the Reformed sense) if a man can ignore His call to repentance?
- 📝 How do creationists address the similarity between Irreducible Complexity and God Of The Gaps?
- 📝 How is the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus interpreted?
- 📝 How was Jesus the Seed of David if Jesus is God who created Man (Adam), and David is the seed of Adam?
- 📝 How does Original Sin come back in man even after being washed at the time of baptism?
- 📝 How do adherents of soul-sleep interpret the parable of Rich man and Lazarus (Lk 16:19–31)?
- 📝 How do the reformed theologians understand Hebrews 3:14?
- 📝 How do Protestant Christians understand the “Sabbath-rest for the people of God” in Hebrews chapter 4?
- 📝 How do Biblical Unitarians respond to translations of Hebrews 1:8 which have God calling the Son 'God'?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses understand the essential nature of hell, and how does it differ from that of Seventh-day Adventists?