How do believers in the tripartite nature of man (body, soul and spirit) explain Jesus' omission of the word "spirit" in Matthew 10:28?
score:4
As a believer in what some choose to term 'the tripartite nature of humanity' I would say that Jesus omits nothing in the text by only making reference to two nouns:
And be not afraid of those killing the body, and are not able to kill the soul, but fear rather Him who is able both soul and body to destroy in gehenna. [Matthew 10:28 YLT]
The soul is the vehicle of the living spirit. Both are immaterial. But the soul has function and capability. The living spirit is associated with that immaterial soul.
To cover all the necessary texts would require pages of input. My book 'The Son of Man' contains the necessarily lengthy study and is available free of charge as a download, see my profile for the link to my website.
Hebrews 4:12 expresses this:
... the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, ...
wherein the soul is likened to joints (the Greek word used for 'joint' is associated with a chariot) and the spirit is likened to the living tissue of marrow within the bone (from which comes red blood).
Thus the mechanical aspect expresses structure and function (the soul) and the living aspect conveys life itself (the spirit).
Paul expresses the same when he speaks of "spirit soul and body", 1 Thessalonians 5:23. One could punctuate that as spirit: soul and body, for the immaterial spirit resides in the immaterial soul and the organic life (spirit) resides in the body of flesh.
The expression 'body soul and spirit' confuses the whole issue and is not the way Paul chooses to word the matter.
Thus Jesus conveys, in Matthew 10:28, a dichotomy of that which is visible and tangible in the world (the body) and that which is immaterial and spiritual (the soul) within which the immaterial living spirit is present, in life or in death. (I repeat, in life and in death.)
The study of this demands considerable attention to, and understanding of, the Greek word psuche which is a broad concept and is translated into English as both 'life' and 'soul' depending on context, indicating how broad that spectrum is.
It is also necessary to fully appreciate the reference in Genesis to God making Adam a 'living soul' and breathing into him the 'breath of life'; and necessary to appreciate the words nephesh (not exactly 'soul') and ruach (breath, wind and spirit - similar to the Greek pneuma) in Hebrew.
Some suppose (wrongly) that God (somehow and unrighteously, for Adam possessed no inherent righteousness) breathed the 'Holy Spirit' into Adam.
This misconception clouds much of the discussion about this matter.
Upvote:1
These resources provide a good introduction to the Tripartite theory and the Biblical verses that suggest it:
- The wikipedia article
- The 1931 journal article Thoughts on the Tripartite Theory of Human Nature from the Evangelical Quarterly journal, which also argues against the Tripartite theory as not reconcilable with Biblical data
- A GotQuestions web article Trichotomy vs. dichotomy of man — which view is correct?, which identies the various models: anthropological monism, anthropological hylomorphism, anthropological dualism and trichotomy while holding an agnostic position.
- What is the soul article by Taylor Marshall summarizing all Greek and Hebrew terms, key scripture verses, early church father positions, Aquinas (anthropological hylomorphism) and later appropriation by the Catholic Church.
The tripartite division is not always consistent, even by their proponents (see pages 122-123 of the journal article). One way makes the soul ceases to exist upon death. From the journal article:
The simplest and we may say the crudest form of the theory is that "the body is the material part of our constitution; the soul or ψυχή [psychí] is the principle of animal life ; and the mind or πνεῦμα [pneuma] the principle of our rational and immortal life. ... When a man dies, his body returns to the earth, his ψυχή ceases to exist, his πνεῦμα alone remains until re-united with the body at the resurrection. To the πνεῦμα which is peculiar to man, belong reason, will and conscience. To the ψυχή which we have in common with the brutes, belong understanding, feeling and sensibility or the power of sense perception. To the σώμα [sóma] belong what is purely material.
Another way makes both soul and spirit survive death. From the GotQuestions web article:
Those who believe that human nature is a trichotomy typically believe the following: the physical body is what connects us with the physical world around us, the soul is the essence of our being, and the spirit is what connects us with God.
Thus, depending on the verse, trichotomists may use different schemes because the Bible seems to use soul and spirit interchangeably. For Matt 10:28 they can use the 2nd scheme above (GotQuestions: soul is immortal, spirit is what connects us to God). These are possible interpretations of the omission:
- Jesus omits the spirit component because the focus of the passage is on the soul which both the saved and the unsaved have.
- Jesus is speaking to believers who are not worried about the spirit, because it is given and is sustained by God. That leaves fear only for the soul component, which Jesus addressed in that passage.
Upvote:1
If we're going to use Matthew 10:28 as a proof text against the trichotomy theory (which does have some value), let's also have a proof text for.
Hebrews 4:12
For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. (emphasis added)
This statement is rather overt, isn't it? The word of God can pierce to the division of soul and spirit; how can this be if there is no division/distinction between soul and spirit? Even if we are not able to articulate how they differ, doesn't Hebrews 4:12 settle the question of whether there is a division?
In my opinion, Hebrews 4:12 is a far stronger proof text for, than Matthew 10:28 is against.
More post
- 📝 Can someone clarify the eastern orthodox teaching "Temps Immobile" of Fr. Alexander Schmemann?
- 📝 In Catholicism, in case of emergency Is it valid to baptise a large assembly of people with a fire hose?
- 📝 In Catholicism, is the Eucharist observed during funerals?
- 📝 When Did Israel First Expect Deliverance from Egypt?
- 📝 Help in calculating cousin degree according to Catholic Church
- 📝 According to Catholicism, can an entire nation be possessed by a demon?
- 📝 How do you know when you are truly saved, and how do you live as a Christian afterwards?
- 📝 What traditions believe that a woman's relationship with God must go through some man and how do they support it from the Bible?
- 📝 How can the "Son of Man" passages of Matthew 24 be interpreted as a fulfilled prophecy?
- 📝 How long did David live?
- 📝 How do Catholic Proponents of Priestly Celibacy Interpret Peter having a wife?
- 📝 Is it true that Martin Luther used some bad language in his own writings?
- 📝 Common arguments in support of the partaking of the divine nature being possible only through Eucharist
- 📝 Did God kill the first borns in Exodus, according to Jehovah's Witnesses?
- 📝 Evangelical Christians claim Jerusalem was destroyed in either 587 or 586 BCE. What is the evidence?
- 📝 Is Meister Eckhart's teaching condemned by the Roman Catholic Church?
- 📝 What is the best interpretation of Matthew 24:29, from the perspective of an evangelical Christian?
- 📝 Why did Pope Francis raise the minimum age for being granted 'Monsignor' from 35 to 65 years?
- 📝 Why did they have such a good memory?
- 📝 Did the Early Church (ante-Nicene period) believe in the continuation or cessation of the office of Apostle?
- 📝 Is the 'Jazz Mass' still able to be celebrated?
- 📝 Clarifications on "Temporal Predestination"
- 📝 Does the Personalistic Norm apply to Divine Persons?
- 📝 Is it the idea of Platonism that describes the mind-body distinction in 1 Cor 6?
- 📝 If a Catholic priest absolves my sins without taking a confession, does it still count?
- 📝 Was C. S. Lewis a "muscular" Christian?
- 📝 Early Church on image veneration?
- 📝 How does the Jehovah's Witness denomination deal with the filial piety among its East Asian believers?
- 📝 What is Christianity's views on real cannibalism?
- 📝 What sort of Christians are proponents of just war?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do believers in the tripartite nature of man (body, soul and spirit) explain Jesus' omission of the word "spirit" in Matthew 10:28?
- 📝 How do believers in the tripartite nature of man (body, soul and spirit) reconcile Genesis 2:7, 1 Corinthians 15:44-45 and Matthew 10:28?
- 📝 How do proponents of the dual nature of man address Hebrews 4:12, "dividing soul and spirit"?
- 📝 Does Roman Catholicism teach that man is body and soul (bipartite) or body, soul, and spirit (tripartite)?
- 📝 Where does the Body, Soul and Spirit of man go after Death?
- 📝 How do believers in Jesus' deity explain that Jesus is never claimed to be God/divine in the Old Roman Creed and the Didache?
- 📝 How do believers in the dead being conscious explain the absence of reports about afterlife experiences by Lazarus and other resurrected individuals?
- 📝 How are the soul and the body related to each other according to the RCC?
- 📝 If the Holy Spirit is God, and God can not be in the presence of sin, then how can the Holy Spirit dwell in me a sinner?
- 📝 Where, exactly, were Christ's body and soul during the Descendit?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the idea that salvation once received cannot be lost explain Hebrews 6:4-6 and 10:26-29?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus, Father, and Holy Spirit are of the same nature but different personas?
- 📝 How does one discern between thoughts inspired by the Holy Spirit and those produced from themselves
- 📝 How do those who believe in salvation by grace, and in works being the fruit of salvation, explain Galatians 6:8-9?
- 📝 What traditions believe that a woman's relationship with God must go through some man and how do they support it from the Bible?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the Dual Nature of Man as opposed to the Tripartite Nature?
- 📝 The difference between how the Holy Spirit and Son "proceed" from the Father
- 📝 How do Eastern Christians explain Jesus "sending" the Holy Spirit in John 15:26?
- 📝 A.W. Pink and the Tripartite Theory of Man
- 📝 How can common believers in the Eastern Orthodox Church be sure that the Church's decisions are correct and not erroneous?
- 📝 Troubled people showing interest in reading the Bible: how to explain to them that faith is a lifestyle and not an "ATM"?
- 📝 How do Catholics explain the apparent inconsistency between Mary's not experiencing labor pain and Rev 12:1-6?
- 📝 How is the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus interpreted?
- 📝 How was Jesus the Seed of David if Jesus is God who created Man (Adam), and David is the seed of Adam?
- 📝 How can we be with Christ when we die, if Christ has a glorified body and we won't until the resurrection?
- 📝 According to soul sleep adherents, why would God allow people to be massively misled by the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Lk 16:19-31)?
- 📝 How can common believers in the Roman Catholic Church be sure that the Church's decisions are correct and not erroneous?
- 📝 Does the indwelling of the Holy Spirit encompass a person's body, soul and spirit?
- 📝 How to interpret the ban of unions between believers and non-believers?
- 📝 How do adherents of soul-sleep interpret the parable of Rich man and Lazarus (Lk 16:19–31)?