How do Jehovah’s Witnesses explain the unique wording of Colossians 1:15-17 in the NWT?
score:1
Long before a single copy of the NWT was printed Jehovah’s Witnesses taught that Jesus is the unique one of a kind direct creation of Jehovah The Almighty God. The verses in Colossians 1:15-17 do not contradict that belief. Translating the word for “all” is dependent on context and there are a lot of instances of it being modified to demonstrate that the original writer did not intend “all” meant absolutely all.
For example Luke 13:2 in the Greek original does not modify the word “all” yet notice how it is modified by the following translations to name a few:
"all the other Galileans" - NIV
"all other Galileans" - NASB
"all other Galileans" - NAB ('91)
"all other Galileans" - NRSV
"all other Galileans" - NKJV
"all the other Galileans" - RSV
"anyone else in Galilee" - NEB and REB
"than any other Galileans" - JB
"than all other Galileans" - NJB
"any other Galileans" - AT
"everyone else in Galilee" - CEV.
"all other Galileans" - TEV.
"all other Galilaeans" - BBE
"other people from Galilee" - GodsWord
"all the other Galileans" - ISV NT
"the rest of the Galileans" - Moffatt
Commenting on the reason that NWT adds the word “other” this article in Watchtower said
In considering this matter it is well to note that Bible writers often took for granted that certain things would be understood, just as writers in our day do. For example, the apostle Paul states, as we read at Colossians 1:16 that by means of Jesus Christ all things were created in the heavens and on earth. But since we know from Revelation 3:14 that Jesus himself was also created, the New World Translation adds the word “other,” which clearly is what the apostle had in mind. But even here, it might be added, that, were it not for the prevalence of the trinitarian teaching that Jesus was not created, it would not have been necessary to add the word “other.”
Thus also the apostle Peter at Pentecost quoted the prophecy of Joel 2:28 (RS): “I will pour out my spirit on all flesh,” and applied it to what took place there. However, we note that God’s spirit was not poured out literally upon all flesh at that time. But it was poured out on ‘all sorts of flesh,’ that is, on not just a select few as in times past but on sons and daughters and men- and women-servants. And so the New World Translation reads that the spirit was poured out “on every sort of flesh,” which obviously is what is meant. Acts 2:17, 18
This blog has an extensive discussion on the topic including this example
The Bible writers very often excluded the subject of a clause - or the person speaking/writing the clause when using the term “all” (and “every”). This is a common usage even today. For example, the police sergeant making an arrest of a criminal group might say: “Everyone in this room is under arrest!” - (person speaking excluded.) Obviously the sergeant does not include himself (nor his captain who is with him) even though he says “everyone”! Or “the criminal tied up everyone in the room before stealing the gems.” - (subject of clause excluded.) Obviously the criminal didn’t also tie himself up.
Upvote:2
Summary of Jehovah's Witness Teaching: Jehovah God is the Creator (Revelation 4:11). He is without beginning or end, and he is almighty (Psalm 90:2). Jesus, on the other hand, had a beginning (Colossians 1:15- 16). Colossians 1:15 calls Jesus “the image of the invisible God.”
Extracts from the 15 September 2005 Watchtower article (pp. 4-7) ‘Who Is Jesus Christ?’
Since all created things had a beginning, there was a time when God was alone. Countless ages ago, however, God became a Creator. Who was his first creation? The last book of the Bible identifies Jesus as “the beginning of the creation by God.” (Revelation 3:14) Jesus is “the firstborn of all creation.” That is so “because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible.” (Colossians 1:15, 16) Yes, Jesus was the only one directly created by God himself. Therefore, he is called God’s “only-begotten Son.” (John 3:16) The firstborn Son also bears the title “the Word.” (John 1:14) Why? Because before being born as a human, he served in heaven as one who spoke for God.
“The Word” was with Jehovah God “in the beginning,” when “the heavens and the earth” were created. He was the one to whom God said: “Let us make man in our image.” (John 1:1; Genesis 1:1, 26) Jehovah’s firstborn Son was there at his Father’s side, actively working with him. At Proverbs 8:22-31, he is represented as saying: “I came to be beside [the Creator] as a master worker, and I came to be the one he was specially fond of day by day, I being glad before him all the time.” https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2005681
Jehovah's Witnesses view Jesus as the instrument of Jehovah God, the Creator:
Not a co-Creator. The Son’s share in the creative works, however, did not make him a co-Creator with his Father. The power for creation came from God through his holy spirit, or active force. (Ge 1:2; Ps 33:6) And since Jehovah is the Source of all life, all animate creation, visible and invisible, owes its life to him. (Ps 36:9) Rather than a co-Creator, then, the Son was the agent or instrumentality through whom Jehovah, the Creator, worked. Jesus himself credited God with the creation, as do all the Scriptures.—Mt 19:4-6; see CREATION. Source: Insight on the Scriptures volume 2, Jesus Christ - https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200002451?p=par#h=7
Because they see Jesus as a created being, they have added the expressions “by means of him” and “all other things” and “created through him” into the text of Colossians 1:15-16.
It is my understanding that the Christian Greek Scriptures of the New World Translation is based on the Westcott & Hort Greek text. The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures acknowledges the fact that the NWT of the Christian Greek Scriptures is “a translation of the Westcott and Hort Greek Text, first published by them in the year 1881.”
Dr. Hort [1] had leanings towards Unitarianism as is made very clear by his associations and his avid support for Dr Vance Smith, the renowned Unitarian scholar on the Revision Committee of 1881. [2]
I am unaware of any other source that would justify the additions made to Colossians 1:15-16 that appear in the New World Translation.
[1] With regard to the Revision Committee, there were two opposite schools of biblical criticism: on the one side Drs Westcott and Hort, and on the other Dr Scrivener. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bwkIAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA502&lpg=PA502&dq=Dr+Hort+Dr+Vance&source=bl&ots=tNaIqD89lF&sig=ACfU3U0PgmTidS1zBS5XSwe-MFpPpLrUUw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjX0Lufw9boAhUSY8AKHbdFCCgQ6AEwA3oECAwQNw#v=onepage&q=Dr%20Hort%20Dr%20Vance&f=false
[2] Dr Vance Smith, Unitarian scholar was (controversially) invited to join the revisers. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pZceAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA88&lpg=PA88&dq=Dr+Vance+Unitarianism&source=bl&ots=PTdj-RFSi_&sig=ACfU3U0r2riTnZfW8sQmpJ4exyhIjqTiKg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiI1Jr-xNboAhV_QEEAHeTBC0kQ6AEwB3oECAsQQQ#v=onepage&q=Dr%20Vance%20Unitarianism&f=false
Here is an extract from The Watchtower—1970 April 15 page 255 – Questions from Readers:
Bible writers often took for granted that certain things would be understood, just as writers in our day do. For example, the apostle Paul states, as we read at Colossians 1:16, that by means of Jesus Christ all things were created in the heavens and on earth. But since we know from Revelation 3:14 that Jesus himself was also created, the New World Translation adds the word “other,” which clearly is what the apostle had in mind. But even here, it might be added, that, were it not for the prevalence of the trinitarian teaching that Jesus was not created, it would not have been necessary to add the word “other.”
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1970285#h=6
That explains why the New World Translation has added the word "other" in Colossians 1:15-17.
More post
- 📝 What miracles were reported during the transferral of St. Monica's relics to Rome?
- 📝 God created male and female.... What about those who do not fit in the box?
- 📝 How would Christianity be different if Paul was found to be a Jewish spy?
- 📝 Does Catholicism consider bisexuality and asexuality sinful?
- 📝 Sola Scriptura and the Biblical Canon
- 📝 How might one categorize all of the books of the New Testament by theme?
- 📝 Does God intend or call some people to live alone forever in their life?
- 📝 What is the Difference between a Heretic and a Schismatic, according Catholic and Orthodox tradition?
- 📝 Is there a recognised soteriology that combines selective election for some and general election for everyone else?
- 📝 Why does Isaiah not mention himself after chapter 39?
- 📝 What are all the different species of intelligent beings that God has created?
- 📝 What was the problem at Babel?
- 📝 What does Augustine mean by the "hymns and psalms" which were introduced into the liturgy?
- 📝 Ark of the Covenent
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 19:24?
- 📝 Orthodox Priest Assignment
- 📝 Do Jehovah's Witnesses allow remarriage after a divorce? Are there any consequences for the congregation member?
- 📝 Is it contrary to any Christian belief or doctrine to believe that Jesus deceives us in order to protect our souls?
- 📝 What is the cross in the mantra "carry your own cross"?
- 📝 What is the historical and theological basis for Protestant anti-Catholicism?
- 📝 Biblical basis for non-practice of Kiss of Peace
- 📝 How do mainstream Christians handle the Epistle of St. Barnabas' prophecy that Jesus will return in the next 50 years?
- 📝 How was the church structured during the time of 300 AD - 500 AD?
- 📝 What was the debate at the Reformation concerning "non extra carnem" vs. "extra calvinisticum"?
- 📝 What does the Parable of the Vineyard Workers mean?
- 📝 How do Christians who subscribe to the "religion vs. relationship" dichotomy make sure that their own relationship with God is genuine?
- 📝 Calvinism: How does Limited Atonement Work in View of the Universality of Christ's Work?
- 📝 Are there any examples where the non-believers demanding a miracle for the proof of Catholic faith and a saint succeeding in performing it?
- 📝 God is love, pure, and all good, and omnipotent?
- 📝 If Jesus was Sinless and had Free Will, how is the rest of creation not a mistake?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do Jehovah’s Witnesses explain the unique wording of Colossians 1:15-17 in the NWT?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses explain the dramatic changes in their eschatology?
- 📝 How do Jehovah Witnesses explain the anger of Caiphas?
- 📝 How do Catholic scholars explain the difference in wording of Mk 3: 21 in NRSVCE vis-a-vis KJV versions?
- 📝 How does the Catholic church explain Matthew 19:9, which seems to allow divorce in case of sexual misconduct?
- 📝 How do Jehovah Witnesses support scripturely the idea that humans will live on earth after death?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses explain Thomas's exclamation, "My Lord and my God"?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses respond to the charge that they are false prophets (because their end-of-the-world predictions didn't come true)?
- 📝 How do "once saved, always saved" advocates explain the Parable of the Sower?
- 📝 How do the proponents of the idea that salvation once received cannot be lost explain Hebrews 6:4-6 and 10:26-29?
- 📝 How do creationists explain the genetic diversity of animals after Noah's Ark?
- 📝 How many witnesses are there who physically saw and/or touched the golden plates from which the Book of Mormon was reportedly translated?
- 📝 How do young earth creationists explain the evidence for ice ages?
- 📝 How would a Catholic explain the absence of the mass in the Epistle to the Hebrews?
- 📝 How do monothelites explain Jesus' prayer in the garden of Gethsemane?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses explain John 8:58-59 in a way that accords with their doctrine?
- 📝 How do opponents of Penal Substitution explain God's declaration that He "will not leave the guilty unpunished"?
- 📝 How do sola fide adherents explain The Parable of the Ten Virgins?
- 📝 The Jehovah's Witnesses deny that Jesus Christ existed eternally or everlastingly, how do they reconcile this with Micah 5:2?
- 📝 How do those who deny Jesus' pre-existence explain the large number of verses suggesting it?
- 📝 How do those who believe in salvation by grace, and in works being the fruit of salvation, explain Galatians 6:8-9?
- 📝 How comparable are the concepts of the Teaching Magisterium in the Catholic Church and the Jehovah's Witnesses view of their Watch Tower society?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses interpret verses like Isaiah 9:6 which call the messiah 'God'?
- 📝 How does the Swedenborgian Church explain passages where Jesus talks/prays to the Father?
- 📝 How do Evangelicals explain when Paul writes "I, not the Lord"?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses explain Paul's apparent equating of Yahweh and Jesus in Romans 10?
- 📝 How do Continuationists explain the fact that the vast majority of Christians have never personally experienced "overtly miraculous" spiritual gifts?
- 📝 How does OEC explain the existence of pre-fall death?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians explain the Father granting life to the Son (John 5:26)?
- 📝 How do Eastern Christians explain Jesus "sending" the Holy Spirit in John 15:26?