how important is self forgiveness in karma ?
score:6
In my understanding,
The original action is one source of karma. The hidden agenda (intention,attitude) behind that act is another source of karma. Our thoughts reflecting on that after it happened is the third source of karma. Our decision to explain what happened and why, in one specific way, is the fourth source of karma.
Each of the four components can be wholesome or unwholesome, so there are 16 combinations in total, or 16 gradations - from 100% unwholesome, to 100% wholesome. Also, the combinations vary by the timing of their effects, producing a complex mixture of some immediate and some latent results.
In context of this question, what we are interested in is the difference between the last two components.
The thoughts about the event (going over it, analyzing, evaluating oneself) can generate either pride and joy, or shame and guilt. This guilt, by itself, is a dukkha, disease. Maintaining oneself in a maimed and injured condition creates negative karma that keeps the vicious circle going.
The decision to explain what and why happened, in a specific way, is the most important component for the long term effects of the action. What is "specific way"? Usually, real life situations are not unambiguous. Instead, they usually have an element of ambiguity, a quantum element so to speak. In most situations we can come up with a number of narratives or interpretations, that will present situation and your role in it rather differently.
What often happens when we analyze a troublesome situation, is we can't decide which perspective we should take. So we keep going over it again and again, replaying it in our head, which can bring a lot of guilt and suffering. Instead, if we decide on one perspective, and make a firm decision to stick with it - then we can stop replaying the situation, and clearly describe what happened and exactly why, and based on this choice of explanation our future will change accordingly.
The perspective Buddha suggest we should take, is that of responsibility, but at the same time the one that will make us strong, not sick with guilt. Here's what happened, here are the attachments that were at play, here is the confusion that was at play, here's the lust and aversion that were at play. Here's why I thought it was a good idea to act like that at the time. However, now I clearly see how and why my actions created that harmful effect.
It is an important skill, according to my teacher, to never betray one's past decisions. If we decided to act a certain way, we must have done it out of our best understanding at the moment. Given our understanding at the moment, we could not have acted differently (if we could we would). However, if we act now, we will act out of our new best understanding, which may be different this time.
The only function of "taking the blame" is to admit that situation indeed happened the way it happened, and that our actions played a role in that. We were acting out of our best understanding, but because our perspective was limited, we participated in creating these negative results. With our new understanding we can see that a better action is possible, and we want to try it that way next time.
This is called "master mind" as opposed to "leaking mind". Leaking mind is the mind that betrays its own foundation, it's own past decisions all the time. Leaking mind says "oh I was so stupid yesterday" or "so wrong" etc. Master mind has an element of confidence and stability, it honorably inherits its past actions and choices, while never getting attached or stuck in the past and taking into account new information as it becomes available.
Upvote:0
The answer comes in the Lonaphala Sutta:
Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there], developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears for a moment.
What developed in body and developed in mind means, is elaborated in MN36:
"And how is one developed in body and developed in mind? There is the case where a pleasant feeling arises in a well-educated disciple of the noble ones. On being touched by the pleasant feeling, he doesn't become impassioned with pleasure, and is not reduced to being impassioned with pleasure. His pleasant feeling ceases. With the cessation of the pleasant feeling there arises a painful feeling. On being touched with the painful feeling, he doesn't sorrow, grieve, or lament, beat his breast or becomes distraught. When that pleasant feeling had arisen in him, it didn't invade his mind and remain because of his development of the body. When that painful feeling had arisen in him, it didn't invade his mind and remain because of his development of the mind. This is how one is developed in body and developed in mind."
Self-forgiveness does not play any role here.
The development of virtue (sila) allows one to think and act in ways that is wholesome. It also counters the ignorance of not knowing what is wholesome, and provides freedom from remorse.
Being developed in body and mind allows one to not react to both pleasant and painful feelings, and have it remain in his mind.
Upvote:1
Karma will result from 'Intention' + 'Action'. basically, any action will form karma, and intention behind will increase the strength of karma. Intention itself will also cause Karma. Therefore:
A) Karma will result.
B) Karma will result.
C) Karma will result.
D) Karma will result.
In Buddhism, there is no such thing as "Payment" of karma through guilt. You will experience the Karma (good or bad) as long as you created it.
If you realized something you did was wrong, learn from it, refrain from repeating it, and do something about it if still possible.
No one has a "say" about the strength of your karma, as Karma itself is a manifestation of natural universal laws. No one can tamper with universal laws. Not even the Gods.
Upvote:1
I understand suffering: A) impermanent suffering: suffering given to other person and have time to heal that (person) B) permanent suffering: no discussion. Simply don't create that, create something better.
Upvote:1
Feeling guilty is not healthy. It obstructs you from learning. Sure, if you feel guilty it might be a motivator, but so is remorse. If one is guilt loaden one can barely think the bigger picture, ignores the fallibility of being human and over-generalizes with statements such as "I am bad", "I am worthless" etc.
Upvote:1
Please if you have time try to find the book "Handbook of the Buddhist". This is written by Ven. Rerukane Chandawimala thero. In this book you will be able to find a good explanation about Karma. I think there is the solution you need. Following link is to buy the book. But try to find it online for free.
http://www.online.buddhistcc.com/books/handbook-of-the-buddhist-detail.html
If you can afford you can buy. (Im not sure these kind of links are allowed here. But please understand that I'm not trying to sell anything here.)
Upvote:3
Three factors contribute to bad Karma.
- Greed
- Aversion
- Ignorance
Not knowing that an action is wrong, does not redeem you from the Karma. It just makes it a Karma based on strong ignorance. To give an analogy, if you mix mud and milk thinking that it's going to create chocolate milkshake, it is still going to taste horrible even if you didn't know it was wrong. If you touch something hot without knowing that it is hot, it's still going to burn your hand regardless of your knowledge.
There is no self forgiving in Buddhism, because you are not supposed to look at Karma in terms of self in the first place. You are supposed to look at it in terms of causes and effect. What you should know is that actions based on greed, hatred and ignorance lead to unfavorable effects and actions based on non-greed, non-aversion, non-ignorance lead to favorable effects.
Feeling guilty makes the Karma worse. What you should do is reevaluating past actions and correcting them if they were wrong or improving on them if they were right.
More post
- π Did Buddha walk on water? Was Jesus trained as a Buddhist?
- π That "Electric Feel" body sensation during meditation
- π What are the main schools of Tibetan Buddhism?
- π Does Vajrayana Buddhism incorporate the use of cannabis?
- π What is difference between anapanasati and kΔyagatΔ Sati?
- π Meditation to simulate Near-death Experience
- π Buddhism and Astral Projection
- π Is the new "Spread Mind" philosophy actually Buddhism?
- π How do Buddhists that think of karma figuratively do so about rebirth?
- π Responsibility in Buddhism
- π What is Generation Stage Meditation also known as Utpattikrama?
- π Similarity between creation in Abrahamic religions and beginning of life in Earth mentioned Agganna Sutta?
- π Developing a intense focus on materialistic things
- π Should I hate them who else hates me?
- π In regard of what or whom are you loyal?
- π What was the first Buddhist text to be translated into English?
- π Spoke to the Buddha in my dream-discard?
- π What is the self cherishing attitude?
- π What is the practice people call "shamata practice". Where did this idea come from?
- π Is the Pali Canon the only canon in modern Buddhism?
- π What are the ways to be conscious in all situations?
- π The five incurable actions
- π How do you know which mantra suits you the most?
- π Right Livelihood and Working in Technical Support
- π Is it alright to have a leather jacket and still consider myself a Buddhist?
- π Eternalism and Mahayana Buddhism
- π Punishments for breaking vinaya rules
- π Can you be aware but not conscious?
- π Sutta references
- π What is Tantric Theravadan Buddhism?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π how important is self forgiveness in karma ?
- π How do Buddhists who believe in a non momentary conventional self during life account for karma without enlightenment?
- π How to deal with bad past karma that makes my current life miserable?
- π If karma is objective, how come it's cause for "good" rebirth?
- π How is it wrong to believe that a self exists, or that it doesn't?
- π How important are incense and candles to a meditation practice?
- π How to discipline self to practice meditation everyday?
- π How does the force of ones karma determine where the mind stream goes?
- π If there is no self how can Nirvana be described as bliss?
- π How is forgiveness defined in Buddhism?
- π What Buddhist materials describe how to increase the number of people with good Karma in a geographic area?
- π How important is lineage in Buddhism?
- π How important is constancy in meditation practice?
- π How can you use Q&A to gain good Karma and also aid to realize liberation
- π In Relation to Rebirth After Death, How is Karma any Different than Supernatural gods?
- π How important is the surangama sutra in cotemporary buddhism?
- π Why is focusing on the breath more difficult than focusing on Mantras, and how important is it before vipassana?
- π How does Karma works?
- π If there is no Self , what Self is there to be affected by the karma which non-Self now performs?
- π How do Buddhists reconcile "Anatta" with Buddha supporting the existence of the Self in the Mahayana Mahaparininirvana Sutra?
- π How important is motivation in determining the virtue/non-virtue of a karmic action?
- π How can the theory of emptiness be true and yet the self still transmigrates and takes rebirth?
- π How important is javana to the jhanas?
- π How does Karma work for an inventor who changed lives of millions?
- π How bad is the karma of feeding meat to your children?
- π How do the concepts of anatta, rebirth and karma coexist together?
- π How to escape Karma fight
- π How to not let the attachment to a self and its preferences influence the choice of a particular tradition in buddhism?
- π A question about my karma and how itβs affecting me
- π How do Buddhists talk about forgiveness and turning the other cheek, for extreme wrong doing?