Can (an) Urban-Dhamma lead to path, fruits and liberation?

Upvote:0

Google suggests the term is associated with Ven. Kusala (though the urbandharma.org web site isn't very up-to-date).

I haven't listened to his podcasts -- I first heard of him in the comments under this question.

The word "urban" conventionally means "in a city" (or "of a city"), contrasted with "rural" ("in the country-side" perhaps farmland or even woodland), or "suburban".

It doesn't mean much to me as a word -- except that if I were living in a big city (which a lot of people in North America do), the term "urban dhamma" might seem to me to imply a meaning like "dhamma here" (e.g. sandiαΉ­αΉ­hiko).

Upvote:0

There are incredible amounts of distraction in a City. Effort, determination, patience, generosity, virtue, truthfulness. Many important qualities can be developed.

Upvote:0

There are many benefits to staying in or close to the city like the access to public facilities, toilets, sauna, healthcare, shelter, food and whatnot.

I think that being otherwise secluded in the forest or a private place to do walking and sitting meditation is the important part.

Upvote:1

I'm not sure what you mean by Urban Dhamma. Do you mean Dhamma practiced in the city? Yes. There's no problem with that.

In his lifetime, the Buddha spent 19 out of 45 vassas at the Jetavana Monastery. This monastery was built by the rich lay disciple Anathapindika.

This monastery was located in the city of Savatthi or Shravasti, which was the capital city of the Kingdom of Kosala with a population of 900,000 in 5th century BCE. It was one of the six largest cities in India, in the Buddha's time. The Buddha had many lay disciples in and around Savatthi, headed by wealthy merchant Anathapindika and wealthy aristocrat Visakha.

So I can't see anything wrong with the practice of the Dhamma in an urban setting.

More post

Search Posts

Related post