Can a lay person commit sangha-bedha?(five heinous acts) Anantarika-karma
Upvote:1
A lay person cannot commit “Sangha Bedha” as it is only when bhikkhus are concerened, but “Sangha Bedha” is not division among bhikkhus, but the fact of the matter is that today every single Bhikkhu commits schism or “Sangha Bedha” knowingly or unknowingly.
The Buddha condemned schism in strong terms, saying that a person who starts or joins a schism in a Community knowing or suspecting that he is not on the side of the Dhamma and Vinaya, is destined to be boiled for an aeon in hell (AN V.129; Cv.VII.5.3-4). Buddha’s instruction is to look into the matter and to side with the faction on the side of the Dhamma. The Buddha does not advocate superficial unity for its own sake at the expense of the Dhamma, but instead encourages that the Dhamma be clearly defended against non-Dhamma and that the distinction between the two be kept clear.
When a bhikkhu has learned that a dispute has led to a schism and he wants to get involved, he is to side with whichever faction sides with the Dhamma. According to Mv.X.5.4, a speaker of non-Dhamma is to be recognized as such if he “explains not-Dhamma as ‘Dhamma’ … Dhamma as ‘not-Dhamma’ … not-Vinaya as ‘Vinaya’ … Vinaya as ‘not-Vinaya’ …
Thus the ability to take sides requires that one be well-informed about the Buddha’s teachings. A schism can be rightfully ended only if both sides are able to investigate the grounds (i.e., the point of dispute around which the schism crystallized), get to the root (the mind-states motivating the schism — see Cv.IV.14.3-4), and then resolve which side was right, based on the Dhamma and Vinaya.
There are cases where bhikkhus have started or joined a schism rooted in corrupted intent, knowing or suspecting that their views and actions deviate from the Dhamma-Vinaya. Those who joined the schismatic faction through ignorance should be won over to the Dhamma side by explaining the true Dhamma-Vinaya to them.
Ven. Sāriputta: “How am I to behave with regard to these (schismatic) bhikkhus?” The Buddha: “In that case, Sāriputta, take your stance in line with the Dhamma.” Ven. Sāriputta: “And how should I know what is Dhamma and what is not-Dhamma?” — Mv.X.5.3 The Buddha: “There are these eighteen grounds by which a speaker of not-Dhamma is to be known. He explains not-Dhamma as ‘Dhamma’ … Dhamma as ‘not-Dhamma’ … not-Vinaya as ‘Vinaya’ … Vinaya as ‘not-Vinaya’ …
Upvote:1
It would be very foolish and dangerous to believe that there is an area of "Narrenfreiheit" (fools-liberality).
Violation of rules (Vinaya) and kammic actions (although often related), are two different things. Of course everybody, not having found firm footing in the Dhamma is capable of all Anantarika-kamma. Note also that in kammic issues, others that Vinaya again, the Schism has to be done in between Noble Ones, at least a valid Sangha. And as Nyom Saptha Visuddhi used only in regard of Bhikkhus: "fact of the matter is that today" is that many "Buddhist" are very virtual in conducting that kind of Kamma and of course do not only have already cut them of of any attainments in this life but also will Devattada like bear the fruits.
May one take care not to associate with fools and giving into their evil and deluded objectives.
[Note that this is not given for stacks, exchange, trade or giving into efforts of common nourished Schism but as a means to escape for this course]
More post
- 📝 Why does the Buddha always answer a question if asked three times?
- 📝 When does right or wrong view at death over ride the karma one has accumulated in life?
- 📝 Importance of good moral conduct
- 📝 why is all of Buddhas past lifes referes to times of kings
- 📝 How to navigate the impracticality of Sigalovada sutra?
- 📝 Reference request: where is this text about abandoning hindrances from?
- 📝 Can there be "one day becoming a fully-awakened Buddha" after Parinibbana?
- 📝 What would be the karmic result of worrying?
- 📝 Are lives of people who have, by birth or design, large amounts of money, worth more to the Buddha, than the poor?
- 📝 Open-monitoring meditation versus doing nothing
- 📝 What is the best way to practice humility
- 📝 Theravada and Mahayana - The Crucial Differences
- 📝 Why are so many Buddhists in the west hostile to academic analyses of the religion?
- 📝 Can a being be stuck in an endless cycle of depression and suicides?
- 📝 Why does SN 12.66 say aging-and-death has acquisition as its source?
- 📝 Is it forbidden to fight to defend your possessions from a thief?
- 📝 Can following Buddhist practices help me in my studies?
- 📝 Can one find liberation independent for himself?
- 📝 Question on the eighth precept of Vipassana
- 📝 Similarity between creation in Abrahamic religions and beginning of life in Earth mentioned Agganna Sutta?
- 📝 How does the Buddha attain nirvana?
- 📝 Buddhist perspective how humans can communicate with spirits?
- 📝 What is the relationship between signless samadhi, emptiness and cessation of perception & feeling?
- 📝 Should I maintain my mindfulness 24 hours a day?
- 📝 Did Buddha walk on water? Was Jesus trained as a Buddhist?
- 📝 English (or other European) translations of Pali Canon
- 📝 Arahants and suicide
- 📝 Which body of the Buddha belongs to the Buddha nature?
- 📝 Compassion to friends: stepping in vs. letting them learn on their own
- 📝 Compulsive desire to correct others
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Can a lay person commit sangha-bedha?(five heinous acts) Anantarika-karma
- 📝 How can a lay person approach the learning process of Buddhism?
- 📝 Can a lay person become an Arahant according to the Suttas?
- 📝 Can a Bhikkhu yell at or beat a lay person under the vinaya?
- 📝 Can a lay person observe the ten precepts on uposatha days?
- 📝 Can the noble eightfold path be followed in its entirety by a lay follower?
- 📝 Can a person live by the Dhamma and have another religion as well?
- 📝 How should a lay person respond if they see a monk teaching something contrary to Dhamma?
- 📝 Can lay people be involved in the weapons business?
- 📝 Can a stream enterer commit suicide?
- 📝 Can somebody remove their bad karma by believing that it doesn't exist?
- 📝 How can a person be abstinent?
- 📝 Can a person reach enlightment living an average life, married with children?
- 📝 How can a person become a real Buddhist?
- 📝 Can anyone follow Buddhism if the person has had drinks & ate non-veg in the past?
- 📝 Can lay people acheive enlighment (Arahanthship) in this life by adhering to Buddhist principles?
- 📝 How can you use Q&A to gain good Karma and also aid to realize liberation
- 📝 Can karma operate at the level of groups i.e. collectively?
- 📝 How can anyone who hasn't realised the truth, claim that Mahatma Buddha or any other person in history realised God or the Truth?
- 📝 Can one's karma be affected by the karma of another?
- 📝 Can a person with harmful thoughts still meditate?
- 📝 Avoiding Triggers that can generate negative karma
- 📝 Can a monk live with a male lay person?
- 📝 Can a bad karma happen just only with a thought without any physical or verbal action?
- 📝 Can an ordained person keep a late sleep schedule?
- 📝 Can a person without any of the five physical senses attain arhatship?
- 📝 I am confused about certain things, I really hope some kind person can help
- 📝 Can bad karma be created and paid back in the same lifetime
- 📝 Can a person choose to reincarnate as a human instead of a god?
- 📝 I believe I have done bad things in a past life can I fix my curse that causes people to turn against me what kind of Karma is this?