Why did science flourish in Germany after the First World War?
score:14
Encouraged by the kind words about my comment, I have turned it into an answer with more details and sources.
The historiography of the impact of First World War on European science contains (at least) two distinct theses that D.Aubin and C.Goldstein dub the Bourbaki thesis and the Forman thesis in [1]. The two disagree on the impact of WWI on the pure science community (negative for the former, positive for the latter) but the two agree on one point: Germany and the rest of Europe had different conceptions of the integration of pure science in the war effort.
In Germany, it was understood from the onset that scientists were to be integrated in the war effort to the full extent of their scientific capability (with, among the most notable figures, the tragic case of Fritz Haber [2]). In France and apparently England (I'm much less familiar with it), whereas scientists were certainly completely integrated in the war effort, it seems that they were mostly used to perform direct computations or considered as ordinary citizens and thus drafted and sent to the frontline. Also, it seems that Germany sent a wider generational spectrum of soldiers to the front, whereas France took a more specific policy (anyone in between a small interval). To take a concrete example, the two foremost institutions of higher science education in France were at the time (and still are) the École polytechnique and the École Normale Supérieure. The first is formally a military institution, so the entire promotion was of course mobilized and sent to serve in artillery. The second had a pretty astonishing casualty rate: 60% of the class of 1910 died in the war and by 1915, out of the 195 currently mobilized students, only 50 were alive and well.
Now the two theses diverge. The Bourbaki thesis holds that this rate of casualty created a vacuum that impaired the development of French science in the 1920. Besides, the mathematicians who kept a scientific activity during the war moved towards applied science and it apparently took them some time to come back to purer science. The Forman thesis, named after [3], holds that the atmosphere of synergy between government and science created during the First World War I in Germany induced a spirit of science moving forward in the early 1920s (much more controversially, he also argued that the traumatic break-out induced a spirit of radical modernism in the Weimar republic which inspired pure science research, a statement that is very hard to historically substantiate). Whatever point of view is more correct, both agree that in one of the former centers of pre-war science (Paris, or more generally, France) pure science development was halted or at least deeply changed by WWI whereas in another (Göttingen, Berlin, more generally Germany) pure science development was preserved, perhaps even encouraged by WWI.
Interestingly, WWII and the Nazi regime had apparently a symmetrical impact: it destroyed the German pure science community with disastrous long lasting impact, whereas the decades immediately after the war were a golden age for pure science in France, despite the crippling defeat and occupation it had endured.
[1] The War of Guns and Mathematics: Mathematical Practices and Communities through World War I in France and its Western Allies, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, to appear.
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Haber
[3] Paul Forman, Scientific Internationalism and the Weimar Physicists: The Ideology and Its Manipulation in Germany after World War I, Isis 64 (1973)
Upvote:11
The truth is that Germany ways de-facto the leader in the majority of sciences from the end of XIX century. In fact, German was the language of science just like English nowadays. For example even French mathematicians recognised the importance of knowing German in order to keep finger on the state recent advances in science. I'm mentioning French for two the reasons: first, it is a country with it own, very vivid, strong and long-lasting academical traditions, second, French was a very popular choice for international communications, much more popular than nowadays.
So, answering your question, though the country had been indeed economically devastated after WWI, this has nothing to do with state of scientific research. Well, of course, economic difficulties had a big impact on all aspects of fundamental activities which traditionally are supported by governments, including scientific activities. But the truth is that scientists keep on working and their success was built on foundations which has been laid years before WWI.
More post
- 📝 How was 19th century ship tonnage reported?
- 📝 Is there still controversy among historians and archaeologists about the exact date of the Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79AD?
- 📝 Why Oppress a Negligible Population (Stolen Generations)?
- 📝 How many people did the Islamic Caliphate send to the Maghreb during the Arabization of North Africa?
- 📝 Why does the Uruk King List say Antiochus I Soter ruled for 22 years?
- 📝 Did the Romans hold the Isle of Wight and surrounding areas before the invasion in 43 AD?
- 📝 What language did Nazi German occupying forces speak in France?
- 📝 Why wasn't the Treaty of Waitangi framed in terms of a feudal exchange, rather than a surrender of sovereignty?
- 📝 Why did the later Crusades seemingly focus more on naval traversal?
- 📝 Were pre-columbian peoples aware of "America" as a three parts continent?
- 📝 What were the native North American concepts of property rights and market exchange?
- 📝 Is Costa Rica's refusal to maintain a standing army unique?
- 📝 Economic status of whites in the US South at the height of slavery?
- 📝 When was first security screen door instaled in Seoul metro
- 📝 Why did it take so long for the Germans to develop the first tank model in World War I?
- 📝 Who is this, probably royal, teenager?
- 📝 What's the dating of the standard Akkadian version of the Gilgamesh Epic?
- 📝 What role did British cartoonists play in the early 1800?
- 📝 Open database with brutalist architecture?
- 📝 What was the significance of the term "Lollard" in describing religious dissenters?
- 📝 Why did Nebuchadnezzar keep King Jeconiah alive?
- 📝 What was entering Grand Central Station like in 1943, especially interior?
- 📝 What was a plausible timetable for a train journey across Europe in 1870?
- 📝 Are there any examples of California gold rush prospectors becoming exceedingly wealthy due to their claim(s)?
- 📝 Why did it have to be Clausewitz who wrote the best book on war, namely On War?
- 📝 Who invented psychological pricing?
- 📝 Were there any monarchs of England or the United Kingdom who were not technically first in the line of succession?
- 📝 Does Tanjore Brihadeeswarar Temple contain more stones than Giza pyramid?
- 📝 Was the religious and cultural diversity a core structural cause of the Ottoman Empire's decline?
- 📝 What tactic/strategy won Napoleon the six-day campaign
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why did science flourish in Germany after the First World War?
- 📝 Why did Germany decide not to restore the Hohenzollern dynasty to the throne of a German Empire after the defeat of Hitler in World War Two?
- 📝 Why did the Soviet Union not "grant" Inner Mongolia to Mongolia after World War Two?
- 📝 Why did it take so long for the Germans to develop the first tank model in World War I?
- 📝 Why did World War I victors let Germany pay reparations in German Marks and gave it the option to default via inflation?
- 📝 Why did the attempts to keep Africa colonized after World War II fail?
- 📝 Why did Germany attack Neutral Belgium in the first world war?
- 📝 What did Germany do in World War II about the different rail gauge in the Soviet Union?
- 📝 Why did the German army execute so few soldiers in World War I compared to most other armies?
- 📝 Why did Chamberlain act to appease Hitler leading up to the outbreak of World War 2?
- 📝 What did Germany do after World War II to recover so successfully that it became more prosperous than its WW2 victors?
- 📝 Why did the United States enter World War I?
- 📝 How did Germany rebuild so quickly after World War I?
- 📝 Why did the British have so few destroyers going into World War II?
- 📝 Why did Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia remain loyal to France during and after World War II?
- 📝 Were the heavy war reparations on Germany after World War I the main cause of its hyperinflation in 1923?
- 📝 Why did Russia support Serbia in the years leading to World War I?
- 📝 Why did antique guns and swords from the Franco-Prussian War make part of the demilitarization program to which Germany was subjected?
- 📝 Why did the French "surrender" all of its troops during the armistice in World War II?
- 📝 Why was Hanford, Washington, selected during World War II as the site of America’s first nuclear energy plant?
- 📝 How did a criminal trial in the Soviet Union work after World War 2?
- 📝 Why did Germany request compensation after the Agadir (2nd Moroccan) crisis?
- 📝 After World War 2, why did European farmers switch from crop cultivation to grazing?
- 📝 Why does the First World War (WW I) play such a minor role today compared to Second World War (WW II)?
- 📝 Why didn't Imperial Japan attack the Soviet Union during World War 2?
- 📝 Why did the British scuttle the u-boats surrendered after WWII?
- 📝 Why did stock brokers go bankrupt after the crash of 1929?
- 📝 Why did Britain and France not declare war against the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland in WW2?
- 📝 Why didn’t Japan attack the West Coast of the United States during World War II?
- 📝 Why was Spanish Fascist dictatorship left in power after World War II?