Why were swords used in battle?
score:11
Pole arms vary greatly in length and purpose. Everything from a Zulu iklwa, a short 1 to 2 meter personal thrusting weapon...
Source: Therion Arms International
...to the 7 meter pike favored by everyone from Philip of Macedonia to Charles the XII of Sweden.
Swords also vary greatly from the Roman gladius, a short thrusting weapon meant to be used in a tight formation...
...to the massive Zweihänder, the German two-handed sword up to 2 meters long.
The iklwa, a pole arm, has more in common with the gladius, a sword, than it does with the pike. Similarly a Zweihänder, a sword, being so long had some of the characteristics of a pole arm.
Then there's "any warfare before the invention of firearms" which is everything from ancient Greeks to Shaka Zulu (firearms did not have an important role in the wars between South African natives during the Zulu Expansion).
It's hard to make sense out of such broad categories and 2000 years of warfare, but I'll give it a shot.
Why were swords used in battle?
Very broadly speaking because in well trained hands they're good at close, individual combat and can be worn conveniently hung on a belt or slung over the shoulder. Polearms must be carried in the hands making them inconvenient. Swords are the medieval equivalent of a sidearm like a pistol.
However, battles are not won by close, individual combat. They're won by groups. This is why the sword was a secondary weapon. The primary melee weapon was the polearm.
A short spear has many of the advantages you list, and this video goes through them in some detail, but that's for a short spear one-on-one. It would be very different if he were wielding a pike.
Pole arms got longer and longer to make them more effective as a group, and less one-on-one. Everything from the Macedonian phalanx to the medieval pike wall exploits a tight formation of men bristling with pole arms. Attacking this formation means fighting not one-on-one, but attacking the group as a whole. Because the work of the individual soldier is fairly simple, stay in formation and hold your pole arm, they don't need to be particularly well trained or physically fit. They were particularly effective against cavalry, so long as the cavalry attacked from the front.
Where swords remained particularly effective is as a cavalry weapon, particularly the sabre. Light and one-handed, you could slash at your enemies from above while still controlling your horse.
Upvote:-4
The problem with a pole arm is that you can only kill one guy with it. If the unit with the spears outnumbers the enemy, fine, but if the enemy outnumbers you, then things will go bad.
For this reason elite units always fought with sword and shield because you may need to kill many people. With a spear you can stick one of them, but if you are facing five or six enemies, you need a sword.
Another issue with a spear is that it can take a long time to kill somebody because the wound is relatively minor. You could stick somebody with a spear and he might just keep going like the energizer bunny. With a sword you can cause massive wounds that put the enemy into shock and disables them almost immediately.
Upvote:2
Swords are Flexible
Polearms generally work well when you can keep a tight formation. The first several lines are all able to engage the enemy, making it difficult for enemies to close within striking distance. But if the enemy comes at you from the side, its very hard to turn your formation to face them.
On the other hand, a sword is a light weapon that does not extend far beyond your body. It is easy to change position - or move in an unexpected direction as a unit.
As an example - the Battle of Pydna (168BC) was a battle between the Roman Legions (armed with the gladius short sword) and the Greek Phalanx (armed with long spears). It initially went well for the Greeks, and the Romans were forced retreat to nearby foothills. However, as the Phalanx advanced over the rough terrain, their lines became disorderly. The more maneuverable Romans were able to quickly concentrate their forces at the places where the Greeks were weakest.
The result is that the Romans defeated a larger force, even after an initial setback.
Swords Pair with Shields
A large polearm generally precludes the use of a shield - you need both hands to wield a halberd or a dagger-ax. This leaves you more exposed to missile fire, such as from archers. A swordsmen is often (though not always) equipped with a shield.
Polearms are Heavy
I'm not sure that a polearm beats a sword one-on-one, as the OP suggests. In a dual the swordsman is in definite danger while at range - the polearm can strike while the sword cannot. But if the initial strike misses, or is blocked by a shield, then the heavy polearm may not be able to "reset" for a second strike before swordsman closes the distance. It would depend a lot on the fighters, their weapons, and, I suspect, luck.
Upvote:13
The Romans developed tactics that involved both swords and spears.
The spears ("pilum") were used first, and were throwing spears (not "polearms").
After the "shock and awe" administered by the throwing spears, Roman soldiers would close in with short, thrusting swords to finish the job. These tactics were similar to those used by men armed with (one shot) muskets, and bayonets, centuries later.
Such tactics required strong, well-drilled formations such as legions. It wasn't until the late Middle Ages that non-Romans could produce (and utilize) such formations and tactics.
Roman soldiers could also use their pilum as "polearms" against cavalry if necessary. That is to say that they were a lot more flexible than other infantry until those of a much later time.
More post
- 📝 What was the role of the college of consuls in Ancient Rome?
- 📝 What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?
- 📝 When did India become a major trading center?
- 📝 How to make sense of Civil War regiment reports?
- 📝 Did the Danes sack Hamburg after the conquest of Hedeby in 983?
- 📝 Why weren't Harappan homes built of stones?
- 📝 How to decode / read US Veterans Bureau Form 7202?
- 📝 In Antiquity, were Persian arrows considered superior to their Greek counterparts?
- 📝 Why do some painted portraits show the subject pointing?
- 📝 Why wasn't the American civil war fought between slaves and masters?
- 📝 What is the role of towers in Romanesque architecture?
- 📝 Did Japanese castaways land in Spanish California?
- 📝 How does a heraldic eagle become a nazi symbol?
- 📝 What is the impact of history on food habits in India?
- 📝 How were new states admitted to the Union?
- 📝 Did the Moors and Arabs, "Muslims," who invaded Europe, ie "Spain," help the evolution of civilizations of Europe?
- 📝 Are there any archeological finds or primary source drawings of the Chinese "blade shaped" bamboo-copter or rotary fans?
- 📝 What techniques were used to make rings in medieval times?
- 📝 Why didn’t Christianity spread southwards from Ethiopia in the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Is there a historical basis for the "day of the false King" described in The Egyptian?
- 📝 Did the German Enigma machine use multiple encryption keys?
- 📝 What were the plans to use the atomic bomb if it had been in time for the war in Europe?
- 📝 Power of Prussian artillery pieces during the Napoleonic Wars
- 📝 Are there examples in ancient history of honor killing?
- 📝 Were people really as haphazardly *burned at the stake* back in the day in Europe as they make it out to have been?
- 📝 Why was Poland able to resist the Swedish invasion during the Deluge, but not during the time of Charles XII?
- 📝 Has being a single mother been always stigmatized?
- 📝 What were the last decisions that an English or a British monarch made that were forced on Parliament?
- 📝 Were there efforts made in the 19th century to inoculate the natives against smallpox?
- 📝 Is biblical Joseph story historically valid?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why were swords used in battle?
- 📝 Why were Navajo code talkers used during WW2?
- 📝 When were swords last used in European warfare?
- 📝 Why were Civil War battle techniques so bloody, if the US had learned guerrilla fighting in the Revolutionary War?
- 📝 Why were the losses in the Battle of Norfolk so lopsided?
- 📝 Why were balls used on the Medici coat of arms?
- 📝 Why were the ship names "Scharnhorst" and "Gneisenau" used together?
- 📝 Why were Japanese submarines not able to defend in the Battle of the Philippine Sea?
- 📝 Were the "hussars" that Jan Sobieski used at the battle of Vienna actually elite troops?
- 📝 Where and why were capital letters first used in English headlines?
- 📝 Why were air rifles not used more in combat?
- 📝 Why were Japanese escort ships not numerous at the battle of Bismarck Sea?
- 📝 Why were greatswords used in the Middle Ages given their downsides?
- 📝 Why were old fortifications shaped like stars and not like circles?
- 📝 Why were ships-of-the line not supposed to open fire on frigates during fleet actions?
- 📝 What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?
- 📝 Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
- 📝 Why were the Romans unable to conquer Germania?
- 📝 Why were so many more Jewish men than Jewish women killed during the Holocaust?
- 📝 Why did the Roman military start to favour swords over the spear phalanx?
- 📝 Why were there no internment camps for German-American citizens in USA during WW2?
- 📝 Why were Spain and Portugal neutral / not invaded in WWII?
- 📝 Why were there no nuclear detonations in 1959?
- 📝 Why were the Allies so much better cryptanalysts?
- 📝 Why were there no religious wars in Poland?
- 📝 Why were women targeted as witches?
- 📝 Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?
- 📝 ‘Avoid sleeping on your back’ & ‘breathe in toilet smells’ were seen as precautions against the Black Death. Why did doctors think these would work?
- 📝 Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?
- 📝 Why were the West African islands uninhabited?