Why were there no religious wars in Poland?
score:33
That Poland avoided internal wars of religion can indeed be attributed to the religious tolerance of the state at this time, a tolerance that stretches back a long time.
And this has to do with it's position, where many of its neighbouring countries were not Catholic. To the east the Kievan Rus adopted Orthodoxy, and further north the areas now known as Lithuania remained pagan until the end of the 14th century, by which time the pagan Lithuanian kings had expanded their rule to cover much of the Orthodox Kievan Rus. Although the Lithuanian rulers adopted Catholicism (in a failed attempt to stop the Teutonic Order "crusading" in Lithuania) much of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania remained Orthodox.
Soon after the official Christianization of Lithuania a Polish-Lithuanian Union was created. This means that the Polish kings had not only the Catholic church, but also several different Orthodox churches in their area. At that point the rulers had a choice between either trying to forcefully convert everyone to the same church (but then, which one?) or just adopt an attitude of religious tolerance.
But Poland's leaders was constantly busy fending off enemies like the Teutonic knights (early 15th century), the Bohemians (15th century), the Crimean Tatars (attacked on 75 separate occasions between 1474 and 1569) and the Grand Duchy of Moscow (pretty much all the time). That meant that it needed to concentrate on defending itself rather than bothering with religion, so the obvious solution was to just let people go to whatever church they wanted.
When the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was created in 1569, it also had a system with checks and balances on power, meaning that the King couldn't have forced a religion on the people even if he wanted to, which continued the religious tolerance, made official in the above mentioned Warsaw Confederation.
To a large extent then, the religious tolerance was to prevent internal religious wars, due to having many churches. This tolerance then paved the way for other religions. The tolerance may also have had some source in the relatively large Jewish population living in Poland since the 10th century. This population seems to have been tolerated by polish kings and princes for economic reasons. But the question then arises why this happened in Poland and not in other places, and I suspect that once again the answer is that the Polish was dealing and trading with both Orthodox and pagans anyway.
If this is multi-culturalism that creates tolerance, or tolerance that creates multi-culturalism, depends entirely on your definition of multi-cultural. But I would say that with normal definitions it's not multi-cultural to have several different churches in a country, but it is multi-cultural to have many ethnic groups and religions. And with that definition it is the tolerance that creates the multi-culturalism, and not the other way.
Further reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Lithuanian_Commonwealth
God's playground - A history of Poland - Norman Davies
Upvote:-2
It would seem that religious toleration in Poland became a necessity because borders with Lutheran Prussia and Orthodox Russia kept changing and people had to be reabsorbed into Poland. Also people fled intolerance in Prussia and Russia going to Poland for sanctuary. Poland needed France and Austria as allies against Prussia; therefore, it was wise to remain officially Roman Catholic while allowing Protestant and Eastern Orthodox to worship freely.
Upvote:0
The Polish political system had its roots in medieval society : the king was elected by nobles (like a tribal chief). Once nobles chose to change their religion there wasn't any absolutist monarch that could stop them. Besides people wore religion more lightly than is realised (of course history records the fanatics but most people were socially religious). It was fanatical Jesuits who forced out other faiths and changed Poland from pluralism to exclusively Catholic.
Upvote:2
Your question identifies, and hypothesizes a correlation between distance from Rome and pro (or anti) Catholic leanings. Under this hypothesis, Poland ought to be a "conflicted" country because of its "middle" distance.
In seeking a correlation (that may be false), the hypothesis overlooks causal variables that affected other "middle distance" countries like England and Bohemia, and not Poland.
In England, for instance, the anti-Catholic spark came not from religion per se, or relations between countries, but rather King Henry VIII's desire to divorce Catherine of Aragon, and marry Anne Boleyn. The Pope, who was practically a hostage of Catherine's nephew, Charles V, couuld not allow this. That's why Henry VIII broke with the Catholic church and set up the Church of England.http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/king-henry.html
In Bohemia, anti-Catholic feeling went back to the early 15th century, to the Hussite rebellions, which were aimed against Austrian overrule. This pre-dated Martin Luther and "mainstream" Protestantism by almost a century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussite_Wars
In Poland, on the other hand, there were no anti-Catholic irritations. In fact, Poland had a history of religious tolerance going back to the 12th century, when King Boleslaus III welcomed both Jews from western Europe and Islamic Tartars from the east. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussite_Wars Thus, when it was offered the alternative of Protestantism, Poland could accomodate both (plus Russian orthodoxy and others).
Upvote:5
In fact, Poland had at least one internal religious war, namely, the Khmelnytsky Uprising in 1648–1657, right at the end of the 30 year war in Central Europe.
Religion, ethnicity, and economics factored into this discontent. While the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth remained a union of nations, a sizable population of Orthodox Ruthenians were ignored. Oppressed by the Polish magnates, they took their wrath out on Poles, as well as the Jews, who often managed the estates of Polish nobles. The advent of the Counter-Reformation worsened relations between the Orthodox and Catholic Churches. Many Orthodox Ukrainians considered the Union of Brest as a threat to their Orthodox faith.
You can read more in the linked wikipedia article as well as this one.
Upvote:12
Poland was indeed involved in the 30 Years War, sending death squads to aid Habsburg allies in Bohemia and getting decked when Bohemia sicced the Ottoman Empire on them.
At this time, Poland-Lithuania was far more unified politically under the Magnates and royalty than the Holy Roman Empire... and nobody kid themselves, the 30 Years War was a political as well as a religious war. Rising European powers sought to solidify their power into what we know now as a nation-state, and the implosion of the Holy Roman Empire gave them the opportunity they needed. Distance from Rome was not as much of a factor as the political landscape - Ireland remained Catholic, mostly to spite their regional rival, England, and they were a very long way from Rome - and many Swiss cantons became protestant, despite bordering on what's now Italy.
The strong leadership in Poland-Lithuania allowed it to quell internal cultural strife with the Warsaw Confederation, which granted religious freedom to the subjects of the Commonwealth. This was something of a tradition for the area, going back to the Statute of Kalisz, which formalized tolerance for Jewish subjects, and the continuation of the toleration policies of Zygmunt II.
This dual policy - tolerating protestants at home and slaughtering them abroad - kept the peace without endangering Catholic rule.
More post
- 📝 How was Washington and Jefferson's relationship in Dec 1799?
- 📝 When was the first recorded example of a race competition in human history?
- 📝 Why were Union troops referred to as "lop-eared Dutch"?
- 📝 Why did Ancient Pueblo peoples build their homes in cliffs?
- 📝 In the British Invasion of Greece, what happened to the British troops who were not captured?
- 📝 Why were diamond mining plots 31-foot squares?
- 📝 How did the different regions' cultures in colonial America eventually begin to unify?
- 📝 When did monogamy become the norm in Ancient Greece?
- 📝 Is a WW2 German bank note with a LITZMANNSTAND symbol possibly fake?
- 📝 Submarine record from WW2
- 📝 Why did some regions end their prehistory much before others?
- 📝 What is this Victorian era British Uniform? Royal Horse Artillery?
- 📝 Besides Massachusetts and Rhode Island, have any other U.S. states changed their names?
- 📝 How long did Adolf Hitler serve on the front lines as an infantryman in WWI before becoming a courier?
- 📝 St. George's Monastery in the West Bank
- 📝 What does "the purpose of history is ideological" mean?
- 📝 What possible uniform with decoration is my ancestor from New South Wales in the early 1900's wearing?
- 📝 Who Is to Be Served First, Duchess or Son?
- 📝 Which country/empire was the dominant hegemon for the longest time?
- 📝 When did the nobles of Europe revert to being "ordinary" citizens?
- 📝 Impact of the spread of disease from non-Europeans to virgin populations in the Old World
- 📝 How did British queens get power over kings despite a male-dominant society?
- 📝 What did Sweden do with all the wrong-sided steering wheels after Högertrafikomläggningen?
- 📝 Was Julius Caesar a hippie?
- 📝 Were iconic structures intentionally destroyed in 20th century wars?
- 📝 Why is a month so different from a year or a day?
- 📝 During the French Revolution, how did the French address non-citizens?
- 📝 How did Milton know about Egyptian gods like Osiris, Isis and Orus?
- 📝 What sources describe the ending of the right to murder family members in 1st century BC Rome?
- 📝 Why did Robert E. Lee stop offensive maneuvers?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why were there no religious wars in Poland?
- 📝 Why were bloody religious wars so incredibly frequent in Europe in the century following the Reformation?
- 📝 Why were there civil wars in Croatia and Bosnia, but not in Slovenia or Macedonia?
- 📝 Were there religious wars between two sects in Hinduism?
- 📝 Why there were no economic sanction wars against Warsaw Pact countries by the West?
- 📝 Why were there no internment camps for German-American citizens in USA during WW2?
- 📝 Why were there no nuclear detonations in 1959?
- 📝 Why were there no agricultural, city-state forming civilizations in the Ice Age?
- 📝 Why were there so few American deaths in the Bataan Death March?
- 📝 The WWI Christmas truce of 1914 resulted in no consequences, in spite of clear warnings against such beforehand - why were there no courts-martial?
- 📝 Were there any wars in ancient Greece where religion played a major part?
- 📝 Were there often intra-USSR wars? If not, why not?
- 📝 Were there any well known royal dynasties that did not in some way cite religious mandate for their rule?
- 📝 In Europe, why were there few portraits showing a real likeness of the subject before the 15th century?
- 📝 Why were there "hussars" all across Europe?
- 📝 Were there any Chinese expeditions to explore the world? If not, why not?
- 📝 Why were there no increases in the train speed records between 1854-1934?
- 📝 Why were there more Muslims in East Bengal than in West Bengal
- 📝 Why were there so many suffect consuls during the Principate?
- 📝 Why were there "Tributary States" to the Ottoman Empire?
- 📝 Why were there so many Japanese Prime Ministers before and during WW2?
- 📝 Were there attempts to rename the French language Prussian order Pour le Mérite, why was it never Germanised?
- 📝 Given that there were there larger, more organised civilisations in South America compared to NA, why did they not colonise North America themselves?
- 📝 Why were there so many US military deaths outside of the major battles in WW2?
- 📝 What wars were there which were contemporaneous with but unconnected to ww2?
- 📝 Was there a battle were Russians forces rallied around a religious icon to achieve victory?
- 📝 Are there notes by the Founding Fathers which indicate why DC citizens were denied a vote in Congress?
- 📝 Why were some German and Japanese cities bombed more than others during WW2? Is there a scientific consensus?
- 📝 What was the main driver of conquest and wars in ancient times? Why were they so frequent?
- 📝 Why are there holidays marking VE/VJ/Armistice Day in different cultures, while many other wars aren't commemorated at their conclusion?