Is there any science behind this graph that suggests we'd be exploring new galaxies if not for the dark ages?
score:18
The title question asks if there is any science behind the graph and the short answer is "No, not really".
This article is a justification of the graph by its creator. In it he states that the graph is his interpretation and approximation of the advancement of science through time (in Europe). It's used to support the author's "hypothesis" that Christianity was "the antithesis of science".
He offers little but personal opinion to support the shape of the graph and even admits that its guesswork:
I did not put numbers there because I have no information on the actual number of scientific advancements. This is because the graph represents a relational graph showing the relationship between the scientific advancements from different times. How can one show relationships without numbers? Easy. By estimating.
Could a graph be made to show scientific advancement if you did have all that information?
It would be difficult because (a) you'd have to define what a single 'scientific advancement' was (which is going to be difficult to do consistently across many scientific disciplines) and (b) you'd have to be able to accurately date a scientific advance (do you pick the date it was first conceived, first published or first accepted by the scientific community, or some other date?)
Upvote:23
I was wondering if there was any actual science behind it: Is there anywhere a measure of scientific discovery per unit time? Do we have anywhere a scale of scientific knowledge and if so, what is it based on?
No. There is no "scientific knowledge" or "scientific discovery" measurable indicator that can be used to compare modern times with the Middle Ages or Antiquity (we have a quite imperfect indicator that can be, with exactly 3,436 caveats, used to measure "scientific advancement" from the Industrial Revolution onwards: patents).
The graph and its article obviously have an ax to grind against "Christianism", and the graph is an ilustration of his ideas about the subject, not of the reality of scientific development.
The graph is obviously problematic, and no article can save it. Here are the main problems:
- It is completely eurocentric.
- The acceleration from the "Greek" period to the Roman one is imaginary. While the Romans certainly did improve on the basis that the Greeks legated to them, the period and place of quick and impressive advancement is from the 6th century BC to the 3rd, in the Greek and Hellenistic world.
- Obviously, there is no such thing as a "Greek" period extending to 1 CE, nor a "Roman" period that starts that late.
- The decline of the Roman Empire starts far before the 5th century AD, and while Christianism is certainly related to it, there are several other problems, both conjunctural (a barbarian invasion, for instance) and structural (a long, agonising crisis of slavery, without any perspective of a breakthrough) that are much more central to that decline.
- The Middle Ages as a whole were far from that stagnant flat line that is show there, and it is quite obvious that the Renaissance starts at a position more advanced than that of the apex of the Roman Empire
- The idea that scientific advancement at the end of Renaissance only matches the advancement of the Roman period borders on the ridicule.
In sum, the graph is a mere impressionistic illustration of a thesis that is at best simplistic. There is not only no actual measurement of anything (as the article recognises), but it doesn't show any real understanding of the dynamics of "progress" during the enormous period it attempts to illustrate.
More post
- 📝 Why did conquered countries after WWII recover, but countries conquered later continue suffering?
- 📝 Does anyone recognize the identity and location of this octagonal structure?
- 📝 In view of the widespread use of the term "Semitic", which groups of people are classified as being of Hamitic ethnicity?
- 📝 Did any Ethiopian leaders help the Italians?
- 📝 What activity would convey the Burma railway & Hanoi Hilton POW project?
- 📝 In the British empire, what was the difference between a Governor General and a Viceroy?
- 📝 What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"?
- 📝 What is this Tiger tank wingman UGV?
- 📝 Why did United Kingdom not keep the colonies after Napoleon's defeat?
- 📝 What is the history of Research and Development laboratories?
- 📝 Nazi Germany's secret service SD was first called Ic-Dienst, what does "Ic" stand for?
- 📝 Is there a commonly-accepted book or a site that explains the history-of-everything?
- 📝 When was this picture taken?
- 📝 What was the relation of Barons to Counts/Dukes/Earls in England during the medieval ages?
- 📝 Did Mao Zedong and Chinese communists collude with the Japanese during the Sino-Japanese War?
- 📝 Did the US and Soviet navies really come close to blows in the Indian Ocean in 1971?
- 📝 How did changes in the balance of land versus naval balance of power prevent England from being successfully invaded by foreign powers after 1066?
- 📝 What were the trade routes between Mapungubwe and other civilizations?
- 📝 Did Northern troops attempt to re-enslave African Americans in Southern plantations during the Civil War?
- 📝 Did Romans piss into aqueducts as a joke?
- 📝 A Principality within England
- 📝 Who made this Sino-Soviet Propaganda Poster?
- 📝 What family or other connection bound Chiang Kaishek and Cai Yuanpei, two ideological opposites?
- 📝 Context for peace between UK and Germany around the Fall of France
- 📝 Why does the US use MM/DD/YY?
- 📝 How were the ladies of the Mughal harem titled and styled?
- 📝 What did Catesby and crew expect to do after the explosion?
- 📝 What was the Nature of Resistance in 1938 Czechoslovakia?
- 📝 Why did wheat become the dominant food culture?
- 📝 Why did people not tend to keep records or consider future consequences until very recently?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there any science behind this graph that suggests we'd be exploring new galaxies if not for the dark ages?
- 📝 Was there ever a single train that ran straight from San Francisco to New York City, or any that ran truly from coast to coast?
- 📝 Is there any data that supports or refutes the claim made in this paper about the Harappan/Indus Valley civilization?
- 📝 Is there any valid basis for this claim that German Emperor Wilhelm II and the Hohenzollern family had Jewish blood?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?
- 📝 Have there been any countries that voted themselves out of existence?
- 📝 Is there any proof that Robin Hood existed?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that the Catholic Church slowed innovation during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Were there any conquests that Ancient Rome undertook explicitly to gain control of a natural resource?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the US Strategic Defense Initiative played any significant role in undermining the USSR?
- 📝 Is there any documentation that indicates the Aztecs were as violent as they are made out?
- 📝 Were there any crops and livestock common to both the Old and New Worlds prior to the Columbian exchange?
- 📝 Are there any records that indicate a submarine vs submarine battle?
- 📝 Is there any research explicitly contradicting facts in Suvorov's "Icebreaker" book series claiming that Stalin intended to attack Hitler in 1941?
- 📝 Were there any well known royal dynasties that did not in some way cite religious mandate for their rule?
- 📝 Were there any war movies made during WW2 that were well regarded by front-line American soldiers?
- 📝 Are there any historians who believe that the crusades were not motivated as a distraction from internal conflicts?
- 📝 Were there any pilots that declined to carry out the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 Is there any country(former colony) in the world that obtained independence and then again tried to join its colonist ruler?
- 📝 Was there any new military innovation during the Siege of Malta?
- 📝 Is there any truth to the claim that freed slaves who moved to Liberia enslaved the local population?
- 📝 Is there any evidence besides the scriptures that the Ark of the Covenant existed?
- 📝 Were there any battles in Continental Europe that were decided by "peasants with pitchforks?"
- 📝 Are there any historical sources that support the claim that ancient high-speed archers held multiple arrows in their hand?
- 📝 Are there any remaining existant texts that describe the styles and techniques of Medieval European swordsmanship?
- 📝 In Dutch history two people are referred to as "William III"; are there any more cases where this happens?
- 📝 Are there any sound historical proofs that soma contained cannabis?
- 📝 Has there ever been any assassination so that another assassination could happen during the first one's funeral?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that Assyrian or Babylonian kings ate their enemies?