Is there any science behind this graph that suggests we'd be exploring new galaxies if not for the dark ages?
score:18
The title question asks if there is any science behind the graph and the short answer is "No, not really".
This article is a justification of the graph by its creator. In it he states that the graph is his interpretation and approximation of the advancement of science through time (in Europe). It's used to support the author's "hypothesis" that Christianity was "the antithesis of science".
He offers little but personal opinion to support the shape of the graph and even admits that its guesswork:
I did not put numbers there because I have no information on the actual number of scientific advancements. This is because the graph represents a relational graph showing the relationship between the scientific advancements from different times. How can one show relationships without numbers? Easy. By estimating.
Could a graph be made to show scientific advancement if you did have all that information?
It would be difficult because (a) you'd have to define what a single 'scientific advancement' was (which is going to be difficult to do consistently across many scientific disciplines) and (b) you'd have to be able to accurately date a scientific advance (do you pick the date it was first conceived, first published or first accepted by the scientific community, or some other date?)
Upvote:23
I was wondering if there was any actual science behind it: Is there anywhere a measure of scientific discovery per unit time? Do we have anywhere a scale of scientific knowledge and if so, what is it based on?
No. There is no "scientific knowledge" or "scientific discovery" measurable indicator that can be used to compare modern times with the Middle Ages or Antiquity (we have a quite imperfect indicator that can be, with exactly 3,436 caveats, used to measure "scientific advancement" from the Industrial Revolution onwards: patents).
The graph and its article obviously have an ax to grind against "Christianism", and the graph is an ilustration of his ideas about the subject, not of the reality of scientific development.
The graph is obviously problematic, and no article can save it. Here are the main problems:
- It is completely eurocentric.
- The acceleration from the "Greek" period to the Roman one is imaginary. While the Romans certainly did improve on the basis that the Greeks legated to them, the period and place of quick and impressive advancement is from the 6th century BC to the 3rd, in the Greek and Hellenistic world.
- Obviously, there is no such thing as a "Greek" period extending to 1 CE, nor a "Roman" period that starts that late.
- The decline of the Roman Empire starts far before the 5th century AD, and while Christianism is certainly related to it, there are several other problems, both conjunctural (a barbarian invasion, for instance) and structural (a long, agonising crisis of slavery, without any perspective of a breakthrough) that are much more central to that decline.
- The Middle Ages as a whole were far from that stagnant flat line that is show there, and it is quite obvious that the Renaissance starts at a position more advanced than that of the apex of the Roman Empire
- The idea that scientific advancement at the end of Renaissance only matches the advancement of the Roman period borders on the ridicule.
In sum, the graph is a mere impressionistic illustration of a thesis that is at best simplistic. There is not only no actual measurement of anything (as the article recognises), but it doesn't show any real understanding of the dynamics of "progress" during the enormous period it attempts to illustrate.
More post
- 📝 Did a significant number of women drive in late 1950s/1960s USA?
- 📝 How can we be confident that Tacitus really wrote his Histories and Annals?
- 📝 What's paradoxical about British free trade in 20th century partitioning of Africa?
- 📝 When did India become a major trading center?
- 📝 At the beginning of English Civil War, why did Parliament take a hard line with neutrals, thereby effectively helping Royalist recruitment?
- 📝 Switzerland's political isolation after World War II
- 📝 What is the oldest archaeological source which mentions a name of a specific place?
- 📝 What were the neoplatonists' attitude towards Christianity (or religion in general)?
- 📝 What is the proper terminology for the changes that occur in a text throughout history?
- 📝 Under feudal primogeniture, did second+ sons ever eye the land holdings of their father's vassals?
- 📝 When studying about the history of, say, Philippines, is it generally better to prioritize the works of Filipino Historians than foreign historians?
- 📝 Would a common person in the 18th century have heard Mozart's music during his lifetime?
- 📝 Is there any record of ancient Israelite contact with Indo-Europeans?
- 📝 How did Rome's legal system work?
- 📝 Why did the population of Descartes, France increase by so much in the 1960's?
- 📝 Why were monasteries built in obscure places around Ireland?
- 📝 How many non-partisan (independent) legislature members were in the USA compared to the USSR?
- 📝 What's this antique coin?
- 📝 By what legal mechanism was Catherine Howard deprived of her title of Queen of England?
- 📝 Why don't tanks have radar aimed guns?
- 📝 What is the origin of these assertions about The Palaces of Qin shih Huang?
- 📝 Were the earliest Egyptian hieroglyphs ever discovered really found in Qustul in Ancient Nubia?
- 📝 Why did classical works re-emerge during the Renaissance?
- 📝 Why were the Yellow River dyke repairs delayed?
- 📝 What is the oldest quote or poem in known history?
- 📝 What capabilities did Southern soldiers in the American Civil War have to get news about the North?
- 📝 To what extent the Jewish theatre of the late Antiquity resembled the Greek one?
- 📝 Meaning of the words "Wanted Dead Or Alive"
- 📝 Eastern Europeans integration in the USA politics
- 📝 Should the Great Schism of 1054 be taken to be 1204 (or 1182) instead?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there any science behind this graph that suggests we'd be exploring new galaxies if not for the dark ages?
- 📝 Was there ever a single train that ran straight from San Francisco to New York City, or any that ran truly from coast to coast?
- 📝 Is there any data that supports or refutes the claim made in this paper about the Harappan/Indus Valley civilization?
- 📝 Is there any valid basis for this claim that German Emperor Wilhelm II and the Hohenzollern family had Jewish blood?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?
- 📝 Have there been any countries that voted themselves out of existence?
- 📝 Is there any proof that Robin Hood existed?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that the Catholic Church slowed innovation during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 Were there any conquests that Ancient Rome undertook explicitly to gain control of a natural resource?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the US Strategic Defense Initiative played any significant role in undermining the USSR?
- 📝 Is there any documentation that indicates the Aztecs were as violent as they are made out?
- 📝 Were there any crops and livestock common to both the Old and New Worlds prior to the Columbian exchange?
- 📝 Are there any records that indicate a submarine vs submarine battle?
- 📝 Is there any research explicitly contradicting facts in Suvorov's "Icebreaker" book series claiming that Stalin intended to attack Hitler in 1941?
- 📝 Were there any well known royal dynasties that did not in some way cite religious mandate for their rule?
- 📝 Were there any war movies made during WW2 that were well regarded by front-line American soldiers?
- 📝 Are there any historians who believe that the crusades were not motivated as a distraction from internal conflicts?
- 📝 Were there any pilots that declined to carry out the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 Is there any country(former colony) in the world that obtained independence and then again tried to join its colonist ruler?
- 📝 Was there any new military innovation during the Siege of Malta?
- 📝 Is there any truth to the claim that freed slaves who moved to Liberia enslaved the local population?
- 📝 Is there any evidence besides the scriptures that the Ark of the Covenant existed?
- 📝 Were there any battles in Continental Europe that were decided by "peasants with pitchforks?"
- 📝 Are there any historical sources that support the claim that ancient high-speed archers held multiple arrows in their hand?
- 📝 Are there any remaining existant texts that describe the styles and techniques of Medieval European swordsmanship?
- 📝 In Dutch history two people are referred to as "William III"; are there any more cases where this happens?
- 📝 Are there any sound historical proofs that soma contained cannabis?
- 📝 Has there ever been any assassination so that another assassination could happen during the first one's funeral?
- 📝 Is there any evidence that Assyrian or Babylonian kings ate their enemies?