Are there any historians who believe that the crusades were not motivated as a distraction from internal conflicts?
score:16
I think you can't really separate the two sets of motivations for the crusades (religious fervor/ political or power-grabbing issues) from one another. In a time where politics and religion were habitually and naturally intermixed it's hard to expect something else.
A look at the list of leaders of the First Crusade to examine their personalities can be useful here (it's a study in mini-prosopography, if you like):
- Raymond IV of Toulouse - a really pious man (he refused to be crowned king of Jerusalem [famous story, look it up]), also a great noble who badly wanted to be even greater and to found his own principality.
- Godfrey of Bouillon - another rather pious man who was also a savvy political operative (he did not refuse the rule of Jerusalem, just humbly asked to be styled Protector instead of King).
- Baldwin of Boulogne (Godfrey's younger brother) - the proverbial medieval younger-son-with-no-patrimony who was looking for a principality of his own, by whatever means.
- Bohemond & Tancred of Taranto - Also mostly looking for land to grab.
- Robert of Normandy - a good-for-nothing perennial rebel who was so poor he couldn't get out of bed for lack of clothing appropriate to his rank.
- Hugo of Vermandois - Empty boaster.
- Robert of Flanders - Seems to have been in it mostly for religious reasons (and glory). He did not try to carve up his own principality.
To sum, it was a (un)healthy mix of religious fervor, greed and striving for glory.
As for the context of the Crusades, they were sort of a counter-movement by Christian Europe against the previous great Moslem movement of conquest. For example, Raymond had fought against the Moors in Spain before the Crusade - so there was clear continuity between the Spanish Reconquista and the Crusades.
Upvote:6
Even as someone with an Anglo-Saxon background, I find it informative to look upon the Crusades in the way the residents of the area must have viewed them — a series of barbarian invasions from the north-west.
Yeah, the Crusaders had their reasons. In their own minds they were completely justified. But the same could be said for the Huns and the Mongols and the Vikings. If we are going to give their side that much weight, we should at least be willing to do the same for other wave invaders of history.
So while I could list some "motivations", I don't really find them nearly as compelling as it appears your friend does. The main issue was that there was a perceived military imbalance. Europeans thought they could whip the Turks and the other Near-East rulers if they acted together. The rest is just the rationalization for doing so that they happened to arrive at.
Upvote:13
The motivation for the various crusades differed.
The first crusade was to a large extent a response to the increasing power of the Muslim empire. This seemed to have worried Christian powers for some time, and when the Byzantine Emperor asked for military help from the Pope to fight off Turkic Muslims the Pope responded with a speech at the Council of Clermont calling for all Christians to help the Christians in the east to fight the Muslims.
This crusade was successful, partly because the Muslim leaders did not recognize that there was a religious element to the invasion, and that the ultimate aim was to "liberate" the holy land from the Muslims. They instead just treated it as another element in the internal fights that was already going on within the Muslim leaders anyway. Therefore there was no concerted Muslim response, and the Christians could pick off local rulers one by one. (ref: Amin Maalouf, "The Crusades Through Arab Eyes")
So the motivation for this crusade was mostly political, although since that politics to a large extent was about increasing the power of the Catholic Church and stopping the expansion of Islam, that politics has a religious part to it. Some of those who took part may in addition have had religious reasons, but most of those who took part tended to do so to grab land and loot.
The second to ninth crusades were attempts to reconquer land that was taken in the first crusade but subsequently lost. As the crusader states that were established after the first crusade quickly lost any pretense to have a religious motivation and just became a part of the local power politics, fighting with other local leaders and often even intermarrying with Muslims, the attempt to re-conquer these lands could use religious reasons only as pretext.
They were therefore fully politically motivated, in any reasonable meaning.
Then there were any other minor crusades. The Northern Crusades and The Albigensian Crusade had a similar mix of politics and religion as the first crusade, politics in as much as it was about extending the power of Christian leaders, and religious in as much as it was about spreading Christianity (or in the case of The Albigensian Crusade, to get rid of a heretical Christian sect).
The Aragonese Crusade was purely political, as it was a Pope vs a Catholic king.
So, in summary, mostly political, but since there was no separation of church and state at this point, there was a religious facet to some of the crusades.
More post
- 📝 To prevent sex were men bound in bags or locked in beds?
- 📝 Were there concrete plans, 40-41, for Japan to attack Singapore/Indonesia, while avoiding a fight with the US?
- 📝 What was the relationship between Angles, Saxons, and Jutes; and the Vikings?
- 📝 How were peasant houses constructed in medieval England?
- 📝 Were Pharaohs still inscribed on walls and written on papyrus after their deaths?
- 📝 Were hag stones ever engraved?
- 📝 When did the Russians first employ a successful envelopment tactic?
- 📝 why were animals domesticated? (for meat and fur)
- 📝 Which Luftwaffe units participated in the raid on Manchester on 11 March 1941?
- 📝 Why was there so little information about sex in Eastern Block countries?
- 📝 Who were the first people to get divorced in Western* Christendom?
- 📝 Did Martin Luther King, Sr. change his name as an allusion to the Semitic root M-L-K?
- 📝 Prominent examples of scientific racism in ancient Greece
- 📝 Has the USA offered aid to every sovereign nation?
- 📝 How can I research an old Nazi ring that grandfather brought back from war?
- 📝 When was King John of England given the name 'Dollheart', and who first used it?
- 📝 Why were male oracles replaced by female oracles?
- 📝 Why did the Soviet Union lift the Berlin Blockade?
- 📝 Why was the Kamchatka Regiment sent?
- 📝 What access did people in the Warsaw pact countries have to Western television and radio?
- 📝 Was there an East German counterpart to the Goethe-Institut?
- 📝 Why do people in Melbourne Victoria Australia get a public holiday for a horse race
- 📝 Did German citizens need a visa to enter Switzerland in 1945?
- 📝 In the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, was there any secret agreement on the timetable, if any, of taking the spheres of influence?
- 📝 Roman navy propelled by animals instead of human rowers?
- 📝 Has there been a war whose declared goal was a mere land grab without any attempts to ethically justify it?
- 📝 Did any of the 50 Destroyers swapped for bases with Great Britain in 1940 sink any Axis military vessels?
- 📝 What was the ancient Greeks view on people of African descent?
- 📝 Is rye bread Turkish?
- 📝 Were there any long-term benefits from sending Lenin back to Russia
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Are there any historians who believe that the crusades were not motivated as a distraction from internal conflicts?
- 📝 Is there any documentation that indicates the Aztecs were as violent as they are made out?
- 📝 Are there any misunderstandings in history that were resolved in the 20th century?
- 📝 Were there any monarchs of England or the United Kingdom who were not technically first in the line of succession?
- 📝 Are there any documented examples of wooden ships which were in active service for 100 years or more? If not, what is the longest?
- 📝 Were there any well known royal dynasties that did not in some way cite religious mandate for their rule?
- 📝 Were there weapons that a private citizen could not legally own in 1789 in the US?
- 📝 Were there any pilots that declined to carry out the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 Were there any westerners who entered the soviet bloc to escape capitalism?
- 📝 Is there any truth to the claim that freed slaves who moved to Liberia enslaved the local population?
- 📝 Are there any historical sources that support the claim that ancient high-speed archers held multiple arrows in their hand?
- 📝 Have there been any nuclear accidents in the US at nuclear facilities which were not "commercial"?
- 📝 Is there any science behind this graph that suggests we'd be exploring new galaxies if not for the dark ages?
- 📝 Are there any remaining existant texts that describe the styles and techniques of Medieval European swordsmanship?
- 📝 Were sailing ships of the line understaffed with gunnery crews so that there were not enough for 2 broadsides?
- 📝 Are there any battles that have been extensively studied across the world?
- 📝 Were there any pharaohs who believed in any of the Abrahamic religions?
- 📝 Were there any assassinations of high-profile Austrian officials before that of the Archduke Ferdinand?
- 📝 During World War II, were there any parts of the Japanese overseas empire that was capable of local re-supply?
- 📝 Are there any histories of indigenous Americans who were taken to Europe?
- 📝 Were there any Native American tribes that had more than a strategic alliance with the Confederates?
- 📝 Besides the Hebrews, were there any other ancient cults that used salt in animal sacrifices?
- 📝 Were there any top Nazi generals who opposed the idea to invade the USSR?
- 📝 Were there any natural disasters that decisively changed the result of a later election by killing the electorate of one side?
- 📝 Apart from Veer Savarkar and S.A. Dange, were there any Indian revolutionaries who filed mercy petitions to the British?
- 📝 Are there any images within the time period of contemporary history (1945 to the present) that had different interpretations by historians?
- 📝 Are there any old paintings (medieval period onwards) that actually depict the female genitalia rather than just leaving the pubic region empty?
- 📝 Have there been any notable people that have claimed that classism and not racism is the current cause of racial inequality?
- 📝 Were there any potential areas around Smolensk that Army Group Center might have found as defensible as the Rzhev line?
- 📝 Are there any communist countries that were model high functioning societies?