Why isn't Somaliland recognized as a separate country?
score:26
This isn't really so much about any US allies not wanting it to happen as much as it is about the African Union not wanting it to happen. In January of 2008, the US State Department issued this statement:
"While the United States does not recognize Somaliland as an independent state, and we continue to believe that the question of Somaliland's independence should be resolved by the African Union, we continue regularly to engage with Somaliland as a regional administration."
This essentially states that the US is willing to concede the recognition of African countries to the African Union and is therefore following their lead. The primary reason that the African Union has given for not recognizing them is that they viewed Somalilands's claim as just another enclave seeking separation, and apparently this violates the principles of the African Union.
The African Union itself does not favour rearranging the borders of African countries, especially where there is no agreement. It feels that, rightly or wrongly, the colonial borders were fixed and that changing them would open up too much uncertainty.
The fact that Somalia refuses to recognize the existence of Somaliland is a significant factor in this. The matter is further complicated by the fact that there is another separationist movement in a tract of land called Puntland which joins these two regions. As long as this instability exists, it is unlikely that the African Union will recognize any country other than Somalia, so Somaliland and Puntland are both left out in the cold. Until the African Union decides to recognize these regions as separate countries, it is unlikely that any other major country will do so.
Somaliland's 'path to recognition'
BTW - The week of independence that you mentioned occured back in 1960. Since Somaliland has essentially been a part of Somalia for over fifty years, it is easier to understand why the African Union sees them as just another separationist movement.
Upvote:-2
Some Arab countries oppose Somaliland recognition: they prefer unified Somalia to counter Ethiopia ...
Plus some American oil companies have gained digging rights from the old Somali regime and would like for things to be the same rather than losing thier rights if Somaliland got recognition.
Upvote:0
Somaliland was not called British Somalia but it was British Somaliland before gaining independence from the UK. the "no rearranging the colonial borders" principle is not applying to Somaliland case becouse claiming its colonial borders as the AU charter said so Somaliland has very strong case which is reclaiming its indepence after Somalia unfairly took everything...
Upvote:2
Which countries' independence is internationally recognised and which is not, especially by Western countries, seems to me to based on principles that are only comprehensible to people in foreign ministries and professors of international law, and make no practical, logical or ethical sense to anyone else.
Why did the West support the right of mainly Albanian speaking Kosovo to proclaim independent from mainly Slavic speaking Serbia, but oppose it when mainly Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine try to do the same?
Why was it OK for the United States to declare independence from Britain long ago but wrong for Biafra to declare independence from Nigeria in more recent history?
Why was it OK for India to demand independence from Britain but wrong for Kashmir to demand independence from India?
I am sure the 'experts' can put forward rationalisations for all this but I suspect rationalisations are what they mostly are. I think there is a large amount of foreign policy establishment 'group think' that seen from the outside can seem hypocritical, pedantic or plain silly.
If the people of Somaliland can create a reasonably successful and functioning state while the rest of Somalia is a disaster it seems common sense and justice that they should be supported.
If the leaders of the rest of Somalia object to that, then let them first create a sufficiently peaceful, prosperous and functioning country of their own that the people of Somaliland might reasonably want to join it.
Upvote:7
It seems to me that in recent times (20-30 years), the international community doesn't really recognize anything until the de-facto groundwork has already been completed.
The best example I can think of is the new Republic of South Sudan. It wasn't recognized internationally until after the results of its own referendum were verified, and until it managed to work out a transitional process and final dates with the Sudan government, from which it was seceding.
Basically, the international community doesn't like to take sides, in case it chooses unwisely. Therefore, it will wait until the results are clear and then recognize those results. That last part is just opinion, though.
More post
- 📝 Does footage of WWI bombing of London by zeppelins exist?
- 📝 Circa 1000, what name would locals in England use for invaders?
- 📝 Was there other research focusing on the medical uses of ether in the 18th Century?
- 📝 Why was a convicted Nazi war criminal buried with military honours?
- 📝 Were any of Queen Victoria’s portraits widely publicised?
- 📝 Why did post-colonial Arabs fail to advance in science and technology?
- 📝 What were the typical arguments against women's higher education in XIX century Germany?
- 📝 What is the evidence to repudiate this version of the "stab in the back" myth?
- 📝 Ancient origins of women's day?
- 📝 What is the citation-system for the Linear B tablets?
- 📝 Did the Chief of Soviet General Staff really say this?
- 📝 Do we have examples of Roman freedmen becoming wealthy?
- 📝 How many of Japan's 29 lost Pearl Harbor aircraft have been accounted for?
- 📝 What are some well-researched books about ships during the Age of Sail?
- 📝 What was the ratio women to men after World War 2 in the Soviet Union
- 📝 Why didn't carrier based fighters support bombers?
- 📝 Was German ever an official language in the USSR?
- 📝 Have there been any nuclear accidents in the US at nuclear facilities which were not "commercial"?
- 📝 Primary sources for ratification of Constitutional amendments
- 📝 Were the "hussars" that Jan Sobieski used at the battle of Vienna actually elite troops?
- 📝 Were people buried in the 19th century with a cloth around their head if so why?
- 📝 Why is the city of Armenia in Colombia so named?
- 📝 Paying for something in Revolutionary Times
- 📝 Why did King Arthur have such a great influence in Brittany?
- 📝 Is the Terrorist Exclusion List (TEL) still used for anything?
- 📝 How long did it take for mail to get to London from New York in 1919?
- 📝 Easter Islands: were the Islanders starving when found?
- 📝 What is the relationship between the Kurds and the Balochi?
- 📝 How did Jean Parisot de Valette, 49th Grand Master of the Order of Malta, die?
- 📝 How did the general population of England convert so smoothly to Protestantism?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why isn't Somaliland recognized as a separate country?
- 📝 Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand separate from the UK?
- 📝 Why is the United States the only developed country whose labour laws leave most up to the employer?
- 📝 Why was the Spanish kingdom in America called New Spain if Spain didn't exist as a country back then?
- 📝 Why did Virginia let Kentucky become a separate state?
- 📝 Why was an independant Saarland country created twice after each world war?
- 📝 Why are the Rohingya not recognized in Myanmar (Burma), amongst the other 135 ethnic groups?
- 📝 Why did the Government of India Act create separate electorates for the depressed classes?
- 📝 Why did Indonesia use a separate currency for West Irian before 1973?
- 📝 Which country was the first to separate (Christian) Church from state?
- 📝 Why are some monarchs sent to exile after a country is declared a republic?
- 📝 Why is the English name of the country "Russia" not spelled "Rossia" (with the letter o)?
- 📝 Why is Britain the only country called "perfidious"?
- 📝 Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union when he was still busy fighting the United Kingdom?
- 📝 Why was France granted an equal status among victors of World War II?
- 📝 Why did Native Americans die from European diseases while Europeans didn't catch serious diseases from the New World?
- 📝 Why bother attacking castles at all? Why not go around?
- 📝 Why did the Confederacy think they could win the American Civil War?
- 📝 Why are Germans referred to so differently in different languages?
- 📝 Why did archery not make a comeback when armor was phased out in the 18th century?
- 📝 Why was Poland spared from the Black Death?
- 📝 Why China was able to unify and not Europe?
- 📝 Why didn't Imperial Japan attack the Soviet Union during World War 2?
- 📝 Why were old fortifications shaped like stars and not like circles?
- 📝 Why didn't Germany blockade the Strait of Gibraltar during WW2?
- 📝 Why does the United States keep using "old" date representations and imperial system, while being in the minority?
- 📝 Why is the consensus that WW2 started on September 1, 1939 and not July 7, 1937?
- 📝 Why did North America economically prosper, and maintain stable government and South/Central America didn't?
- 📝 Why did the British scuttle the u-boats surrendered after WWII?
- 📝 Why do western monotheistic religions seem to be so full of conflict over dogma?