How do you explain the Christian Message to people who have no Christian vocabulary or context?
score:7
This was the original point of "The Four Spiritual Laws. In that scheme: 1. Sin separates us from God 2. We cannot pay for our sin 3. Jesus did pay for that sin by dying on the cross 4. If we trust him, he will take us to heaven.
Even that assessment, however, (substitutionary atonement at its best!) is a bit technical and theological Below is how I would relate the Gospel to a "newbie" (And note, I am not using them exactly as stated)
You were created to be a good thing, but like all all of us, you haven't lived up to that full potential. None of us is good enough to be what it is that God (the Supreme Being and Creator of all that is) designed us to be. (Gen 1:27, ISA 53:6, Eph 2:10)
Because we are not living up to what God would have us be, there is a penalty- an inability to be with God. Justice demands that as people who fall short of God's glory, we cannot stand in God's presence. (Because God is perfect, and we are not, how could we truly stand to be with someone totally holy? It's like when all those Nazis looked into the Ark of the Covenant and saw the angel of the Lord! We just aren't strong enough or pure enough to look upon absolute pure holiness. ) (Ex 34:2, Mal 3:2, Rom 3:23, rom 6 &7)
Because of that gap, God realized that he had to make the first step- and here is that good news: that God so loved the world, that even though he was God, he chose to empty himself of being God, in order to find a way that he could both pay that for that penalty, and show us how to live with Him once he returned to his full God-like nature. (John 1, 3:16, Phil 2:5-12)
If we are simply willing to completely trust Him, he is willing to make us fit to stand in his presence, blameless, with great joy! (Prov 3:5-6, Jude 24, 25)
He will cause us to suffer, he will discipline us, and he will command us to do all sorts of things completely contrary to what our"common sense" will tell us to do- but if we completely trust him- if we take Him at his word, we will become his children- heirs in a legal sense. He talks to us through the Bible, through prayer, and by causing things to happen in our lives that force us to learn how to discern his will and lean on him for the strength to do what he would have us do. (Heb 12:1-6, James, Rom 8)
The primary thing that God would have us be is loving. God is love. God desires what is best for us, even if it is not the thing that gives us the most pleasure. He trains us to do the same thing- to love others in the way that he loved us. (Heb 12:1-6, (1 John, 1 Cor 13)
Upvote:-2
Jan, you're on a wrong and very dangerous path. This is the road that leads to watering down the truth in order to cater to unbelievers. Can you show me one instance where Jesus or His apostles ever attempted to do what you're asking? Why don't you follow in the footsteps of the apostle Paul and not be ashamed of the gospel?
Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes...
Notice how it says it is the power of God to everyone who..."believes." If people won't believe, they are condemned already (John 3:18). If they won't believe, we are to shake the dust off our feet and move on:
Matthew 10:14 Jesus said, "Whoever does not receive you, nor heed your words, as you go out of that house or that city, shake the dust off your feet."
If they won't believe then they are doomed. It is impossible to please God without faith. It is not our job to "get" them to believe...God does that. Our job is to be faithful in preaching the unadulterated truth.
Read Ezekiel 37. How do the dead bones live?
Upvote:0
There is a Christian view presented by Solomon that thinks in terms without direct faith in God. I think when we remove words about faith in God we arrive at the sane destination:
“Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. “Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.” (Ecclesiastes 1:2)
I guess what I am proposing is that it is not possible to answer your question because without describing and beleiveing in God as someone who sent His Son to die for the sins of the world, Christian faith is also meaningless.
Upvote:3
I've noticed that all the views here appear to only present salvation as substitutionary atonement, which is one scriptural portrayal of salvation among many others (adoption, Christus Victor, recapitulation, theosis, etc.). There is nothing wrong with this portrayal, but it was never used in the same sense we have it today in the Church prior to the 11th century (thank you Anselm and Aquinas).
I think that the gospel presentation is somewhat contextual. Even our language is contextual ('Jesus' is a Greek rendering of 'Yeshua,' best transcribed into English as 'Joshua'). For some cultures and individuals, adoption may best help them connect with God's love for us in Christ, while in others Christus Victor may best help. None of these views are invalid by any means, we must simply remember that they are all attempts at explaining the miraculous and profound mystery of salvation.
I've found that without any context of the biblical narrative, simply presenting the 'Four Spiritual Laws' tends to create an individualistic message devoid of things like repentance, baptism, becoming part of His Body (the Church), becoming citizens of His kingdom, becoming disciples/apprentices of Jesus, the return of Christ, and the future hope of a bodily resurrection. The gospel challenges Western culture and shares how God's kingdom is breaking into this world, invading enemy territory. I don't really present the Gospel under a minute anymore, but I can give snapshots of it and point people to Jesus, mostly through parables. If we reflect, Jesus did the same. He didn't try to tell the whole story, He told parables to provoke thought and to challenge people, then He moved on. Those who wished to follow, did so (and even then He turned many away because they would not forsake all for the sake of the kingdom).
I think we do a disservice to our faith when we condense it into a short presentation. The gospel is all about becoming connected to a person, Jesus Christ, not just a historical event. Not to mention, the condensed gospel message has been used in America for quite some time now. We can see its fruit in American Christianity today: an individualistic faith (all I need is me and Jesus) where God came to help ME fulfill MY purpose. Not to die to myself and follow His purposes....
More post
- 📝 Apologetic on suffering using a reference to Jesus
- 📝 Is there a way to prove that God’s foreknowledge is incompatible with genuine human freedom?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church interpret Galatians 2:7?
- 📝 Does the Mormon Church endorse the children of narcissistic parents breaking off contact with them (not necessarily permanently/forever)?
- 📝 Where does Calmet write when idolatry began?
- 📝 Was the Trinity severed during the crucifixion?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for "believers' baptism"?
- 📝 Could Jesus Christ hate something or someone?
- 📝 What prophesies are people alluding to when they say "look at the Middle East"?
- 📝 Is there any methodology according to Bible to drive out demons from possessed people?
- 📝 What different acts do Catholic priests require of people who go to confession?
- 📝 If God is unable to change, why did he (after the Flood)?
- 📝 What is the difference between these versions of the KJV?
- 📝 Could the Revelation have happened right when Jesus died?
- 📝 What is the highest position a married man can achieve in the Catholic church?
- 📝 What vehicle did God use for Jonah to receive this word?
- 📝 Which Christian sects promote faith healing?
- 📝 Was Jesus' human nature included in the Trinity?
- 📝 Why does God ask Abraham to walk blameless?
- 📝 Why were Jehovah's Witnesses holding a Memorial Service for Jesus on Tuesday, March 26 2013?
- 📝 What is God's shape or form?
- 📝 How should other churches respond to a pastor and congregation who live contrary to the Gospel?
- 📝 How does Christianity traditionally explain the need to subject the Israelites to slavery in Egypt?
- 📝 In the Christian Reformed Churches, who evaluates the pastor's theological beliefs?
- 📝 Why is there a need for a perfect sacrifice? Why does Jesus have to be perfect?
- 📝 Who Said: "God Did Not Become Man in Order for Man to Become a Theologian''?
- 📝 Did Adam and Eve ever practice animal sacrifice?
- 📝 Biblical support for why something is a sin?
- 📝 In the "Apostles' Creed" were they referring to themselves when they said "holy catholic church"?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis against the idea that Jesus descended into hell?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do you explain the Christian Message to people who have no Christian vocabulary or context?
- 📝 How do Christians who believe in libertarian free will explain the large imbalance in the ratio of people saved vs. condemned?
- 📝 For those who deny the deity of Jesus Christ how do you explain Isaiah seeing Christ/Messiah with his physical eyes at Isaiah 6:1?
- 📝 How have mainstream Christian denominations interpreted the Acts command to abstain from blood?
- 📝 How do those who deny Jesus' pre-existence explain the large number of verses suggesting it?
- 📝 How do those who believe in salvation by grace, and in works being the fruit of salvation, explain Galatians 6:8-9?
- 📝 How do Continuationists explain the fact that the vast majority of Christians have never personally experienced "overtly miraculous" spiritual gifts?
- 📝 How do Christians who insist upon keeping the 7th day Sabbath explain Acts 15?
- 📝 Troubled people showing interest in reading the Bible: how to explain to them that faith is a lifestyle and not an "ATM"?
- 📝 In the tradition of Jehovah's Witnesses, does Romans 6:23 mean that all people who are resurrected have their sins blotted out?
- 📝 How do people who believe in immediate heaven for believers at death explain Tabitha?
- 📝 According to Jehovah's Witnesses and Unitarians and all who deny that Jesus is the Almighty God, how can He be in you and live in you?
- 📝 How do Christian Evolutionists explain the timeline of Genesis chapter one?
- 📝 How does Western Christian theology explain the doctrine of the Filioque within the context of the Old Testament?
- 📝 How have US Christian churches handled discrimination and segregation in the past?
- 📝 (LDS perspective) How would people before Mormonism have entered heaven since they would not have known the masonic handshakes?
- 📝 How do Christians who see Scripture as self-evidently inspired explain that Catholics, Protestants and Mormons have different sacred scriptures?
- 📝 How do Christians who believe that eternal life begins now explain the fact that Christians die?
- 📝 How would a Christian explain the contradiction of loving but calling h*m*sexuality a sin?
- 📝 How do those who believe in the immortality of the soul explain Leviticus 21:11?
- 📝 Are there published testimonies from people who had experiences with the Christian God of which they had no prior knowledge?
- 📝 How do Christians who are neither Evolutionists nor Young Earth Creationists explain the timeline of the six days of creation in Genesis chapter 1?
- 📝 How do those who believe that the dead are conscious explain passages in Psalms that seem to suggest otherwise?
- 📝 How do Christians who believe that the saints enter a blissful state as soon as they die explain David, Isaiah & Job's pessimistic outlook on death?
- 📝 How do those who hold Trinitarian doctrine existed from the earliest days of the church explain the lack of debate about it in the New Testament?
- 📝 How can a Christian effectively explain the seeming contradiction between Gen 1:31 and Gen 6:6?
- 📝 In Christian mortalism, what sets apart people who have lived from people who didn't live?
- 📝 How do Christians approach the evangelization of individuals who have had profound spiritual experiences in other religions?
- 📝 How does the power of the Holy Spirit manifest in Christians, as opposed to non-Christians who don't have access to this power?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians who argue the 'ego eimi' at John 8:58 ought to be translated 'I AM' explain the lack of reactions to the same phrase?