Why do Christians pray to Jesus instead of to God the Father directly, and isn't it risky?

First is to understand the Name. God the Father's name is (יהוה).

Now to understand why Jesus came "Then they said to Moses, “You speak with us, and we will hear; but let not God speak with us, lest we die.”" (Exodus 20:19 NKJV)

Yet with instructions we where to be given a display model to see how to fulfill these commandments. "I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him." (Deuteronomy 18:18 NKJV)

Notice that it is stated "My words in His mouth" and "He shall speak to them all that I command Him."

In 1 John we find "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (John 1:1)

Since this Prophet was to only be saying the things that where commanded to him to say. This prophet was a true representation for God so he came in the Fathers Name "I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive." (John 5:43 NKJV)

So when we are praying to Jesus we are praying to God, because Jesus is God the Father's Name "Father, glorify Your name.” Then a voice came from heaven, saying, “I have both glorified it and will glorify it again.”" (John 12:28 NKJV)

So to understand how this is so, an understanding to word structure is needed. In English if I say "Ball" that has one meaning, yet if I say "Baseball" a more defined word has been created. To Hebrew for the name of Jesus is (ישוע).

The change to the word changed the meaning to the word. (ישוע) means "יהוה Salvation".

Phonetically after much research I have come to the conclusion that the Fathers name (יהוה) is either truly "Yioua" or "Yiou" Yes you will find many places that say that his name is pronounced "Yahweh" but I have found resources from Hebrew Phonetical teachers that the (Yah) is more correctly (Yih) and that the today's hebrew "Vav" historically had the sound of "OO". I will explain why I feel that is "OU" soon.

Now the Son's name is pronounce in this version of the Hebrew (Yeshou), many believe that it should be pronounced "Yeshua" but with more studied into Hebrew Phonetics I found that the Hebrew letter "Ayin" at the end of a word is considered silent. And I have reason to perceive that it is indeed silent. Now in an alternate version of the meaning "יהוה Salvation" the pronunciation could indeed sound like (Yeoush). When both forms are squished together you end up with (Yeshoush).

Now the Greek rendering of the name of Jesus is Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous). The Greek "I" has the sound of the "Y". The Greek had no letter for the "SH" sound. Therefore the Sigma was used a single "S". So by sound the Greek Rendering would sound like (Yesous). See how the early church fathers used the "OU" in the spelling. So I am simply trusting them. Now some research into the history of the letter "J" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J). You will find that it was a fancy "I". So Iēsous became Jēsous, and when spelled in English became simplified to Jesus.

So not only do we have proof that the Son came in the Father's Name and saying only what the Father Say's. We can learn from scripture one more thing. "He saw that there was no man, And wondered that there was no intercessor; Therefore His own arm brought salvation for Him; And His own righteousness, it sustained Him." (Isaiah 59:16 NKJV)

Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel. (Isaiah 7:14 NKJV)

Immanuel means "God with us" so used more as a title.

Both chapters, Isaiah 53 and 54 is Gods amazing presentation to the world about what is to come. But specifically for the references that I need.

But He was wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities; The chastis*m*nt for our peace was upon Him, And by His stripes we are healed. (Isaiah 53:5 NKJV)

For your Maker is your husband, The Lord of hosts is His name; And your Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel; He is called the God of the whole earth. (Isaiah 54:5 NKJV)

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life— 2 the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us— (1 John 1:1-2 NKJV)

Here is an attempted answer as I mentioned above, to further illustrate what I am looking for in the question. I hope it won't get too many downvotes for admitting that I don't know the final answer, but only addressing the question in the proper form.

First of all, we can't know anything 100%, and we just have belief. But in fact, many Christians believe they have the Holy Spirit convicting them of the Truth of the Gospel, and the inerrancy of the Bible that we have today.

Therefore, even though the Gospel was written by men, it contains the truth about Jesus Christ. The Churches did in fact argue over the nature of Jesus for a while, but ultimately they held ecumenical councils beginning with the Council of Nicaea, at which they declared the proper doctrine as a creed.

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, the maker of heaven and earth, of things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the begotten of God the Father, the Only-begotten, that is of the essence of the Father. God of God, Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten and not made; of the very same nature of the Father, by Whom all things came into being, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible. Who for us humanity and for our salvation came down from heaven, was incarnate, was made human, was born perfectly of the holy virgin Mary by the Holy Spirit. By whom He took body, soul, and mind, and everything that is in man, truly and not in semblance. He suffered, was crucified, was buried, rose again on the third day, ascended into heaven with the same body, [and] sat at the right hand of the Father. He is to come with the same body and with the glory of the Father, to judge the living and the dead; of His kingdom there is no end. We believe in the Holy Spirit, in the uncreated and the perfect; Who spoke through the Law, prophets, and Gospels; Who came down upon the Jordan, preached through the apostles, and lived in the saints. We believe also in only One, Universal, Apostolic, and [Holy] Church; in one baptism in repentance, for the remission, and forgiveness of sins; and in the resurrection of the dead, in the everlasting judgement of souls and bodies, and the Kingdom of Heaven and in the everlasting life.

Anyone who is a mainstream Christian today MUST believe in this Creed, or may be excommunicated by the Church.

So therefore, those who believe in this Creed (a vast majority of Christians) believe Jesus is God. Most of them may not know how the Church ultimately arrived at this conclusion, but they trust the early Church leaders to have figured it out correctly in the first few centuries.

Given this, it says clearly that Jesus is God in the creed. And therefore it's completely interchangeable what name you use. As for why Christians do it -- it is because the person praying to Jesus feels gratitude and love for the person of Jesus coming to save him or her through the sacrifice on the cross. And to feel this more personally, they pray to Jesus, their personal savior.

As for the questions "do we know 100%" -- no, we only have belief. And Christians believe in the Nicean Creed, so that's that. We don't know what the 1-10 above really mean, but anyone who believes Nicean Creed is true continues to believe it and can try to explain them without worrying too much about the possibility that Jesus isn't God. Here is how one might address it:

1) Jews didn't extrapolate too far. It was perfectly reasonable at that time, given the context, to assume that Jesus' claim to be the "Son of God" is the same as being "God", and "you say that I am" means "yes I am God".

70They all asked, “Are you then the Son of God?” He replied, “You say that I am.” 71Then they said, “Why do we need any more testimony? We have heard it from his own lips.”

2) Jews were better placed to know what Jesus' words meant, even if he didn't explicitly say he is God. And therefore we today should also believe what these Jews believed about Jesus' claims. When Jesus said "the father is in me and I in the Father" he means that he is God. No further questions.

Again they tried to seize him, but he escaped their grasp.

3) Jesus as a Human had human limitations and instincts such as self preservation and therefore he was saying that God's will should be done, as God is omniscient while Jesus in the Human body did not in fact possess omniscience.

4) Well why wouldn't he? That doesn't mean he isn't God.

5) Here we are going to suppose that Jesus meant this was only true while he was in his Earthly body.

6) As I said before, Jesus in the Human body did not in fact possess omniscience. And that statement was only meant about him at that moment, later the Son would be omniscient.

7) Here Jesus is actually telling the young man he is God! You see, the young man simply used a title used for rabbis. And Jesus challenged him on that title and hinted that only God is good, and wink wink guess what, the young man was speaking to God incarnate!

8) Once again earthly body. This was never supposed to be placing limitations on Jesus for all time.

9) Yes, Jesus was a man but also God. The nicene Creed is clear about it.

10) It's pretty close to God, are you really going to split hairs here? Through him all things were made. So it's pretty clear that the Logos, which we understand here as Jesus, is before all things that God created, so praying to him is OK.

Ultimately, even as I attempted to answer the above, I noticed that my explanations DO NOT RULE OUT the opposite position, but merely are alternatives. So there is still a chance that Jesus isn't God. But that would mean the Nicene Creed is wrong, and whoever believes that is a different sort of Christian, one who challenges man made doctrines no matter the authority. And perhaps Jesus taught that the authority of the Church is supreme, in which case Protestants in general should watch out going against it.

So do the benefits of praying to Jesus outweigh the risks? To me they do not. But then again, I am always questioning and still looking for the truth. I hope one day I will find it.