Do all Christian views need to have a Biblical basis?
score:10
A good reference on the reformed, evangelical position on this is from chapter 1 of the Westminster Confession
We speak of the Bible as God's Word because in it he speaks to us (2 Tim 3:16). He speaks to us personally in the Bible through the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 2:12). Because the Bible is considered as God's Word it is his definitive words to us, the only infallible source of knowing him. It is also sufficient for everything we need to know about him. This means that in theory we don't need to look anywhere else to know God's will.
Some points to note:
The Bible won't tell us about absolutely everything that there is to know. It isn't particularly concerned about things like mathematics. The Bible is the final authority on matters of faith. Often it may not even answer your personal questions about God and his will. In this situation, either it means that we need further reflection, or that we're asking the wrong questions which means we may need to realign our concerns with the Bible's.
The Bible won't state everything down explicitly. Often our understanding of God is derived as a consequence of what we read in the Bible. E.g. the Bible doesn't mention the Trinity, but we can certainly see the ideas (e.g. John 17). This has implications on contemporary issues or things which we think the Bible doesn't deal with. We can draw principles and doctrines and apply them to different contexts. But you likely won't find specific answers to decisions in your own context such as whether you should do X or Y.
Not everything in the Bible is easy to understand. Often the difficulty in understanding lies in our own hardness against God, which is why God has given us the Holy Spirit to help us. Often it is because of the difficulty in understanding the actual meaning. The reformers also derived the principle that Scripture should interpret Scripture, which upholds the authority of the Bible while recognising its difficulties. Often the difficulty in understanding is not in individual statements but in the message as a whole and in the emphases. E.g. many parts of the Bible teaches us to love, but it is not the biggest teaching. The biggest teaching is that we need God's salvation because without it we cannot love anyway.
It's commonly recognised that there are at least 3 other sources: reason, tradition, experience. These are part of God's common grace to everyone. They can be helpful, but these should only be considered as secondary sources. They are ultimately flawed because people are flawed.
Reason. We use reason in deducing a lot of things, even reading the Bible. But we know that our capabilities to reason are limited, and people contradict themselves anyway. From a philosophical perspective, we can't know God by sheer reason. Our senses have limited scope, and by nature we deny God anyway (Rom 1:19f). God needs to reveal himself to us and tell us about himself and what he desires. E.g. he needs to tell us that there is only 1 of him. Anything else is just a guessing game. E.g. "I think God is like ..."
Experience. Can we know God from experiencing a vision? We don't particularly need it if the Bible is his revelation to us. A vision doesn't make us more anointed. Neither do we need such a vision or revelation to supplement the Bible since the Bible is sufficient. But if we do get such a vision, it should still be weighed up against Scripture (e.g. 1 Jn 4:1-3). Besides, the Holy Spirit is the important subjective, experience of God. I don't mean speaking in tongues, and it doesn't need to 'feel' particularly spiritual. The fact that we can repent and believe in Jesus is evidence of it already.
Tradition. Can an individual (such as the Pope) have more authority to give a special revelation from God? People may have particular gifts from God, e.g. Eph 4:11. The Apostles carried a unique authority because they were eyewitnesses to Jesus (Acts 1:21). But no one has a special phone line to God. All Christians have the same direct line to God, i.e. the Holy Spirit. Even the Apostles needed that before they could start preaching (Acts 2). Having said that, the teaching of church leaders, books or each other can be helpful. Even non-Christian teachings/writings can be helpful. But that's not to say that they're always right. Neither can they carry the same authority as the Bible, because they are ultimately man's words.
So we can have secondary sources to help us know God, but the ultimate authority is the Bible because of the special authority that the Bible carries as the Word of God. The implication is that everything else is either wrong or inadequate, which means that we do need to come back to the Bible in the end. And because of the difficulty of understanding the Bible sometimes, we need to continually be going back to Scripture. You may even be surprised by what you find.
Upvote:-3
Short answer: YES! Why? It's my biblical basis:
2Co 10:5 KJV
Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
The bible is like a programming language that can compile itself! :)
Upvote:6
I was going to write a nuanced answer, but upon reflection, I think I'll come down firmly on the side of: No.
I realize many will disagree, but I'd like to offer several reasons for my view, as food for thought.
Not all churches that are commonly regarded as Christian believe that all Christian beliefs must have a biblical basis. Most Protestant churches do, but Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox give Tradition a strong role. Timothy Ware (aka Metropolitan Kallistos), in his book The Orthodox Church, gives the Bible the principal place within Holy Tradition.
The list of books of the New Testament was not definitively settled until the late fourth century. See, for instance, Development of the New Testament canon on Wikipedia. There were some books that weren't included until very late, while some books were included in early versions of the New Testament that no longer are. For instance, the 5th century Codex Alexandrinus (in the British Museum) contains 1 and 2 Clement, even though the canon was supposedly closed prior to that date. For a long time there wasn't a strict separation between "inspired" and "unspired" books.
Until the invention of the printing press, it wasn't possible for most Christians to possess a Bible. Until Gutenberg, making a copy of a book was a laborious process, potentially a work of months, done entirely by hand. In the past I was told tales of Bibles chained to pulpits in Catholic churches, lest the faithful find out what they really said. In fact, though, Bibles were chained to pulpits because they were so hard to create, and therefore were extremely expensive. Further, the faithful had a chance to hear Scripture at every service; all of the ancient churches had a lectionary, which prescribed readings of the Gospels, Epistles, and in some cases the Old Testament.
But this was a far cry from every man having his own Bible. If Christianity were dependent on that, it could not have come about until the fifteenth century.
Upvote:8
Clearly not all Christian views need to have a Biblical basis. I'm a Christian, and I have the view that the square of 2 is 4, and that Neil Armstrong walked on the moon, however these view are not explained in the Bible.
I think the closest Christians have to a principle similar to that about which you're asking, is the concept that all Christian views must be consistent with the Bible. And I believe that all Christian traditions can agree with this--to the extent that they believe the Bible can be accurately interpreted.
Catholics hold Tradition in high esteem, but (to my understanding), they believe that Tradition never conflicts with the Bible.
The LDS church has other scriptures they use, but again, these, at least in their view, never conflict with the Bible.
And in my examples, the Bible doesn't say anything about the square of 2 not being 4, nor that Neil Armstrong did not walk on the moon.
More post
- 📝 Is there a Patron Saint against the coronavirus?
- 📝 Are there other explanations of ”right hand” than masturbation (Matthew 5:30)?
- 📝 When Pope Francis dies, is Pope Benedict automatically the 'new' leader for a short period?
- 📝 Do you have to have a certain amount of intelligence to get into heaven?
- 📝 Does the LDS Church prohibit the use of caffeine?
- 📝 What was the difference between Ratramnus's view of the Eucharist and that of Calvin?
- 📝 What is the source of Paul's issues with Sophistry?
- 📝 Does an evangelical understanding of the 'laws of nature' make God seem more distant or close?
- 📝 What did the carnivores/predators eat on the Ark?
- 📝 Using the invitatory at the office of Vigils
- 📝 What was the reason why the Jews specifically used the substitute Adonay/Kyrios for the Tetragrammaton?
- 📝 Are there circumstances where to "love your neighbor as yourself" also means you put him ahead of you?
- 📝 Does God hate unborn children?
- 📝 Given a Catholic understanding of Hell and individual judgment, do Catholics believe that all Protestants will go to Hell?
- 📝 What is the Scriptural Basis Against the Trinity
- 📝 Are there any theories or traditions for dating how long after creation the Fall of Man occurred?
- 📝 According to Anglicanism, is the Pope the Antichrist?
- 📝 Ignatius of Antioch: Christophoros or Theophorus?
- 📝 What do "Templar" and "Soldiers of Christ" mean?
- 📝 How did Luther and Calvin view Christian perfectionism?
- 📝 What support is there in the Patristic writings for Marian Devotion?
- 📝 What was the debate at the Reformation concerning "non extra carnem" vs. "extra calvinisticum"?
- 📝 Is "the law of faith" in Romans 3:27 the same as "the law of the Spirit" in Romans 8:2? If not, are they still linked?
- 📝 How can we be sure our specific Christian confession is true, when every other Christian group claims that it's not?
- 📝 Catholic Baptism Process Pre-Vatican II
- 📝 From a biblical perspective, Who performs a miracle - the person or God?
- 📝 Do we have free will to choose salvation or is our "choice" an illusion?
- 📝 When did sin and evil in the universe first appear?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for the "one" in "the Trinitarian God is one being in three persons"?
- 📝 What is the basis for the Swedenborgian view that the most common concept of God in Christianity (the Trinity) is a belief in three gods?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Do all Christian views need to have a Biblical basis?
- 📝 What biblical (scriptural) basis does a Christian have to command the blessings?
- 📝 What is the Biblical and historical basis for Christian pacifism?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the priesthood of all believers?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for testing the truthfulness of every statement made by Prophets or Apostles who have been confirmed as 'real'?
- 📝 Did George Muller have a Biblical basis for not accepting illegitimate orphans?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for the concept that demons have an odor?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for saying that we won't have a second chance to be saved after we die?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis used by Reformed theologians to argue that all those dying in infancy are saved?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for Christians NOT to quit their jobs, sell all their possessions, and preach the gospel?
- 📝 What Biblical basis do "separation traditions" have to support their beliefs?
- 📝 Do any non-Swedenborgian Christian denominations have a smaller biblical canon than Protestantism?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for Christian denominations to believe in a visible appearance of Christ Jesus when he returns?
- 📝 What are the predominant Christian views on whether Jesus had to specifically die by crucifixion? Could he have chosen another kind of death?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis that God's sacrifice is sufficient for all of our sins (past included)?
- 📝 What is the Catholic biblical or canon basis saying some moral works without grace (transient or permanent) are good (or not have the nature of sin)?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis that we no longer need to confess and repent?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for all people meeting God when they die?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for only keeping the weekly Sabbath while disregarding all the other feasts/holy convocations (Lev 23, Num 28, 29)?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for accepting Feminist Christian Theology which says we should use female pronouns for God?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for saying that Matthew 22:30 refers to all marriages ceasing at death?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for asserting that infants can have faith in Christ under a Calvinistic framework?
- 📝 Biblical basis or rationale for Christian Identity Movement?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for rejecting Feminist Christian Theology which says we should use female pronouns for God?
- 📝 Is there a consensus among Christian scholars or apologists as to which Biblical prophecies have been fulfilled?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for requiring someone to have faithful children to become an elder?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for All Saint's Day?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief that people must have children?
- 📝 Which Christian denominations believe there is a biblical basis for hunting animals for sport?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for saying that Middle East Region will not have peace?