According to those who hold that the Word at John 1:1 is a person, how do they explain 1 John 1:1 using 'that' instead of 'who' for the Word?
Upvote:5
John states categorically, that no man hath seen God at any time, stating these words in his gospel account, John 1:18, and in his first epistle, 1 John 4:12.
Therefore he begins his epistle by stating what it was that he and his fellow disciples had seen.
They had seen with their eyes and they had handled the word of life. That is to say not words as such, nor mere doctrine only, but they had seen and handled the word that is of life.
Life is John's focus, here.
And he enlarges on that life.
It is 'the life the eternal' την ζωην την αιωνιον.
And it 'was with the Father'.
John points to a life that co-existed with the Father and that eternally.
Thus John states that the invisible, the divine, the eternal, the ever-living, was that which they had, in the humanity presented to them . . . 'seen' and 'handled'.
No man can see or handle deity.
But they had seen and handled 'that' which was, on earth, visible and tangible, the living presence that had ever been with the Father. One with the Father.
This is 'that' which John presents : God manifest in flesh, 1 Timothy 3:16 (TR and KJV).
Matthew Henry says as much in his commentary on this verse:
1:1-4 That essential Good, that uncreated Excellence, which had been from the beginning, from eternity, as equal with the Father, and which at length appeared in human nature for the salvation of sinners, was the great subject concerning which the apostle wrote to his brethren. The apostles had seen Him while they witnessed his wisdom and holiness, his miracles, and love and mercy, during some years, till they saw him crucified for sinners, and afterwards risen from the dead. They touched him, so as to have full proof of his resurrection. This Divine Person, the Word of life, the Word of God, appeared in human nature, that he might be the Author and Giver of eternal life to mankind, through the redemption of his blood, and the influence of his new-creating Spirit.
Matthew Henry Commentary, Biblehub
So, also, Benson in his commentary:
Now here was condescension and kindness indeed! that a person possessed of eternal, essential life, should put on flesh and blood, or the entire human nature; should assume infirmity, affliction, and mortality, in order to visit sinful mortals, to dwell among and converse with them; to reveal to them, procure for them, and then confer on them, eternal life; even felicity and glory unspeakable with himself for ever!
And, again also, Matthew Poole :
He interrupts the stream of his discourse by this seasonable parenthesis, while he therein gives an account how the Word of life, the life, that eternal life, ( already noted to be here all one, and chiefly to mean the Son of God), which being with the Father must be to us invisible, came to be so sensibly known to mortal men on earth; which he doth by telling us he was manifested
Matthew Poole, Commentary, Biblehub
All quotations are from the KJV based on the Textus Receptus.
More post
- 📝 According to Catholicism, which popes have been elected to the papacy without being in priestly orders?
- 📝 How were the footnotes in LDS scriptures created?
- 📝 Does the Bible prescribe any rules for who may attend and "join" a Catholic church?
- 📝 When did Martin Luther begin to see the church as entirely apostate?
- 📝 Why do Jehovah Witnesses think that the cross doesn't have hands?
- 📝 What is the Arminian view of God's providence?
- 📝 Was Antipas a person or is the word a symbolism for Christian?
- 📝 Is there any historical record of Elizabeth the First's reaction to John Knox's tract on 'the monstruous regimen'?
- 📝 According to the Catholic Church, is belief in trinitarianism required for salvation?
- 📝 What does it mean to test God?
- 📝 A gull and a crow attacked the peace doves released by the Pope. What is Christian interpretation?
- 📝 Location of the tabernacle in Catholic churches?
- 📝 What do Quakers believe about war and serving in the military?
- 📝 Which denominations follow "queer theology"?
- 📝 Anne and Joachim are the parents of Mary - is this a Catholic dogma?
- 📝 What is the significance of adding "fiery" to Ephesians 6:16?
- 📝 If a person undergoes an emergency baptism, then recovers, do they need a "non-emergency" baptism?
- 📝 Banns for entrance into novitiate?
- 📝 What happened to the resurrected after death?
- 📝 When was “pistis christou” first understood as a statement about Christ’s faith?
- 📝 Are there any denominations that do not require pastors to be college educated?
- 📝 Was the First Apocalypse of James written after the Second Apocalypse of James?
- 📝 Which church traditions regard Constantine the Great as a Saint?
- 📝 In Catholic understanding, did Paul speak/write ex cathedra while Peter was serving as Pope?
- 📝 Trying to find information on a crucifix found whilst metal detecting
- 📝 What major translations of the Bible are in the Public Domain?
- 📝 Matt 15: What penalty for not washing hands?
- 📝 Demon Possession in the Old Testament?
- 📝 If humans are now genetically tainted by corruption, what was perfection like?
- 📝 Do Catholics have an "Apocrypha" or just a "Bible"?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 According to those who hold that the Word at John 1:1 is a person, how do they explain 1 John 1:1 using 'that' instead of 'who' for the Word?
- 📝 For those who hold that John 1:1 is about a Genesis beginning, how do they explain the light coming after life?
- 📝 How do those who hold to a literal interpretation of the flood account respond to the criticism that Noah building the ark would be unfeasible?
- 📝 How do those who hold to the causal power of the Eucharist reconcile that view with Jesus' statement at Matthew 15:16?
- 📝 How is the amazement of the Jews explained by those who believe that "Render Unto Caesar" affirmed the paying of taxes?
- 📝 If only those who died after Jesus death are among the ones that go to heaven, how do JWs view the ascension of Elijah?
- 📝 According to the Catholic Church, what happens to a person who is in the process of learning about Catholicism, if that person dies?
- 📝 How do those who interpret John 10:30 as a claim to full divine equality by Jesus also interpret John 10:29, which says the Father is greater?
- 📝 According to Catholicism how does a person discriminate between hearing the true word of God versus a hallucination or a demon?
- 📝 If according to the Jehovah Witnesses that "there was a time when God was alone," who was with God at John 1:1?
- 📝 According to Jehovah's Witnesses and Unitarians and all who deny that Jesus is the Almighty God, how can He be in you and live in you?
- 📝 What is the difference between the two creations of humans, according to those who believe they are in chronological order?
- 📝 How do those who hold Jesus = God in the Trinitarian sense account for Paul's reticence to state this clearly and consistently?
- 📝 What are the arguments of those who believe that the prerequisite stated here by John is yet not sufficient for being born of God?
- 📝 How do those who reject the deity of Christ understand the 'sameness of honor' in John 5?
- 📝 How do those who believe that Jesus is a created being understand the verses which say everything that was created was created by him?
- 📝 How do those who believe that the dead are conscious explain passages in Psalms that seem to suggest otherwise?
- 📝 How do Christians who believe that the saints enter a blissful state as soon as they die explain David, Isaiah & Job's pessimistic outlook on death?
- 📝 According to Trinitarians, in John 1 is Jesus both the Word and the Light, and if so how do we make sense of John 1's wording?
- 📝 How do those who hold Trinitarian doctrine existed from the earliest days of the church explain the lack of debate about it in the New Testament?
- 📝 How do those who hold Genesis is in a mythic genre but the Gospels historical genre reconcile Luke 3's genealogy which matches Genesis?
- 📝 According to Protestants who hold that belief in Trinitarianism is necessary for salvation, what happens to those who assent but don't understand?
- 📝 How do those who hold doctrines that God is omnipotent and omniscient answer what 1 Corinthians 1:25 implies?
- 📝 How do those who cite 2 Tim 3:16 to prove the inspiration of Scripture know that 2 Tim 3:16 is itself inspired and what is meant by "All Scripture"?
- 📝 How do Christians who reject the idea of purgatory deal with the fact that most people don't repent of every sin before they die?
- 📝 How do those who hold to the filiquoe understand 1 Timothy 6:16?
- 📝 According to those holding that Lazarus was literally raised from the dead, why did Matthew, Mark, and Luke not mention it?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses respond to the charge that they are false prophets (because their end-of-the-world predictions didn't come true)?
- 📝 How is young-earth creationism theologically harmful, according to those who do not adhere to it?
- 📝 How does 1 John 2:19 fit with the teaching that Christians can lose their salvation