How do those who hold to the causal power of the Eucharist reconcile that view with Jesus' statement at Matthew 15:16?
Upvote:1
Here's what the Catechism says about the benefits for receiving communion:
What material food produces in our bodily life, Holy Communion wonderfully achieves in our spiritual life. Communion with the flesh of the risen Christ, a flesh "given life and giving life through the Holy Spirit," preserves, increases, and renews the life of grace received at Baptism. This growth in Christian life needs the nourishment of Eucharistic Communion, the bread for our pilgrimage until the moment of death, when it will be given to us as viaticum.
Jesus doesn't say that the soul and divinity of the food you eat passes into the latrine. If food is spiritual unclean, it's still not OK to eat, St. Paul says we shouldn't eat food sacrificed to idols, for pragmatic reasons - not reasons of our own spirituality, but because it looks bad to others.
It would be entirely Manichean for Catholics to believe that there is Good food and Bad food and they mean different things, bad food has no power it is nothing to us, Good food (and I'm using the word Good intentionally because no one is Good but God) is everything to us.
Holy Communion separates us from sin. The body of Christ we receive in Holy Communion is "given up for us," and the blood we drink "shed for the many for the forgiveness of sins." For this reason the Eucharist cannot unite us to Christ without at the same time cleansing us from past sins and preserving us from future sins:
For as often as we eat this bread and drink the cup, we proclaim the death of the Lord. If we proclaim the Lord's death, we proclaim the forgiveness of sins. If, as often as his blood is poured out, it is poured for the forgiveness of sins, I should always receive it, so that it may always forgive my sins. Because I always sin, I should always have a remedy.
That last part was from St. Ambrose, the Eucharist a remedy for sin. Some remedies are taken proactively, some are taken after the fact (after venial sins at least).
As bodily nourishment restores lost strength, so the Eucharist strengthens our charity, which tends to be weakened in daily life; and this living charity wipes away venial sins. By giving himself to us Christ revives our love and enables us to break our disordered attachments to creatures and root ourselves in him:
Your belief in Christ and His love doesn't go away when the Bread of the Eucharist is absorbed into your bloodstream.
Since Christ died for us out of love, when we celebrate the memorial of his death at the moment of sacrifice we ask that love may be granted to us by the coming of the Holy Spirit. We humbly pray that in the strength of this love by which Christ willed to die for us, we, by receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit, may be able to consider the world as crucified for us, and to be ourselves as crucified to the world. . . . Having received the gift of love, let us die to sin and live for God.
CCC 1392-1394
The Eucharistic celebration is a re-presentation of Christ on the cross, not just the Last Supper, the whole celebration is done in connection with the Cross. If it were the case that a remembrance of a celebration should be quashed then Jesus ought to have turned the tables over at the Wedding at Cana instead of miraculously making wine.
Maybe this addresses your question, but St. Paul says you have to receive worthily
Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died
1 Cor 11:27-30
First, we need faith in Jesus’s true presence in the Eucharist. The Eucharist is not a symbol. It is the body and blood of Jesus that he offers us to enter into communion with him.
https://denvercatholic.org/receiving-the-eucharist-worthily/
You don't "enter into communion" with a chicken sandwich. You have to believe that the Eucharist is what Jesus says "my Body".
Second, we also need to remove obstacles to receiving the grace of Jesus’s presence. If we are in a state of serious, mortal sin, we are not able or ready to enter into the communion that Jesus offers us
ibid
You must be in a state of grace to receive Communion in the Catholic Church.
Upvote:3
This is a good example of our needing to be aware of 3 elements in using a Bible verse for spiritual living:
- Hermeneutics: proper interpretation based on context, author's worldview, etc. In this case, we determine that the context of vv. 16-18 is Matt 15:1-20 about the parable that says people aren't defiled by what they eat (v. 15) but by what they think, say, and do (v. 19). This is in contrast to the Pharisees's lopsided meticulousness in considering ONLY whether they become defiled
- by the manner the food is prepared & stored cleanly and
- by the manner the food is touched (i.e. ceremonial hand washing, v. 2).
- Theology: combining all relevant verses regarding breaking bread and eating, not just one isolated verse. Thus, we need bring these verses together (source: this article):
- John 6:54-57: Jesus's command to eat his flesh
- John 6:48-50: Jesus's interpretation of his flesh as bread of life
- 1 Cor 11:26: Proclaiming the death of the Lord until he comes
- Acts 2:42-43: Communal life with breaking of the bread
- 1 Cor 10:17: Symbolic communion as single body of Christ by sharing a loaf of bread
- Authoritative interpretation: Using the example of the Catholic church as a group that "holds eating the Eucharist as crucial for spiritual development" (the OP requested perspective), the Catholic church interprets further the Biblical theology above into the teaching that the physical act of eating of the transubstantiated wafer becomes the means for Jesus to become the channel of grace which we need for our spiritual progress. Other groups like Lutherans and Reformed have their own development of the Biblical theology into their own version of Eucharist as spiritual food.
If you only consider Matt 15:16-18 in isolation not only from Christian Biblical Theology (considering the whole canon) but also from a Christian Tradition, you will end up with a wrong use of that verse, because:
- Biblical theology will not consider Matt 15:1-20 as in the same category of discussion of the bread of life, since the passage is about regular meal at home. It is not about making one clean through eating. Nor is it about increasing spiritual health, which in the OT it was through repentance (water baptism) and through proper sacrifices at the temple.
- The theological category of communion has to do with "eating" Jesus, which is not at all in view in Matt 15:1-20, so it's a "category mistake".
- A sacramental theology includes typology (such as fulfillment of OT manna or as fulfillment of OT ceremony of the eating meat that has been properly sacrificed (cf 1 Sam 1:9)), consideration of other commands of Jesus to "eat for life", as well as connection with other doctrines regarding Jesus's presence in the world.
Conclusion
The question:
How do those who hold eating the Eucharist is crucial for spiritual development reconcile that belief with Jesus' teaching on the importance of eating or not eating things for being holy?
Jesus uses eating in connection with several different teachings:
- In Matt 15:1-20 the "input" is physical. The teaching is that it's the "output" that can defile us. Jesus teaches that spiritual "output" (thoughts, words, deeds) can defile us. Spiritual "input" is not discussed at all. So here Jesus IS SILENT about the efficacy of a spiritual input. Therefore, Matt 15:1-20 does NOT exclude the spiritual benefit of the Eucharist
- It's in other passages mentioned above that Jesus teaches how spiritual input (his body) will result in spiritual development. (Although Eucharist should not be seen as making someone holy; that is in repentance + absolution for Catholics or justification for Protestants). The justification of this teaching is done through other verses and the group's sacramental theology which connects physical "input" to become spiritual "input" which in turn produces spiritual improvement in the heart. It is still the heart's actions APART FROM THE EUCHARIST that will subsequently defile us or not through the heart's spiritual "output" (thoughts, words, deeds).
The general lesson is that proper hermeneutics, theology, and authoritative tradition are 3 necessary components to use a passage for spiritual application. We cannot interpret one passage in isolation with only logic and linguistic as the sole interpretive tools.
More post
- 📝 What does it mean that all scripture is God-Breathed?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the concept of being "slain in the spirit" and what exactly is it?
- 📝 What does Jesus mean regarding "Raca," and "you fool?" - is he contrasting them?
- 📝 Is belief or faith the same as idolatry?
- 📝 What does "proceeds" mean to Eastern Orthodox?
- 📝 What is the LDS church's stance on the curse of Cain?
- 📝 How does Calvinism explain how an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent creator could NOT have a plan for universal salvation?
- 📝 What place do ontological arguments for God have in Christianity?
- 📝 Are there any names a Pope can’t choose?
- 📝 Did any medieval Catholics believe in the possibility the repentance was possible immediately after death?
- 📝 Greek or any other language New Testament edition or document(s) predating the Old Latin (Vetus Latina) translation?
- 📝 Was there ever a "Martin Luther" or a reformation in the Eastern Orthodox Church?
- 📝 Do those who pray to saints ascribe to them the quality of being able to hear many people at once?
- 📝 Why does Christianity have Satan as well as God?
- 📝 How is the historical accuracy of the Bible defended?
- 📝 Trinity, is the son of GOD, GOD himself/itself?
- 📝 Looking for Complete Online Collection of the Sermons of German Priest, Fr. Franz Hunolt, S.J
- 📝 Is Jeremiah 10:2-5 referring to a Christmas Tree?
- 📝 According to Catholicism and Revelation are we going to be able to eat meat in Heaven or the Garden of Eden?
- 📝 Any philosphers arguing that the Christian worldview is the most rational?
- 📝 100 Year Anniversaries? - Sacred Heart of Jesus
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for both tithing and offering in the New Covenant, instead of just offering?
- 📝 Do the Orthodox and Catholic Churches allow participation in each others' services?
- 📝 Is there any evidence for the claim that the Catholic church suppressed translation of Scripture?
- 📝 Why was the Apostle Paul seemingly not that interested in baptizing believers?
- 📝 According to Calvinism, why does God give mercy to some and not to others?
- 📝 Are there other biblical examples of people turning into pillars of salt?
- 📝 God made them male and female - is this truth now redundant?
- 📝 Where did the "humans become angels" tradition come from?
- 📝 What is meant by Living God? Why is Lord Jesus the True Living God?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do those who hold to the causal power of the Eucharist reconcile that view with Jesus' statement at Matthew 15:16?
- 📝 How do those who hold to a literal interpretation of the flood account respond to the criticism that Noah building the ark would be unfeasible?
- 📝 If only those who died after Jesus death are among the ones that go to heaven, how do JWs view the ascension of Elijah?
- 📝 How do those who hold Genesis is in a mythic genre but the Gospels historical genre reconcile Luke 3's genealogy which matches Genesis?
- 📝 According to those who hold that the Word at John 1:1 is a person, how do they explain 1 John 1:1 using 'that' instead of 'who' for the Word?
- 📝 For those who hold that John 1:1 is about a Genesis beginning, how do they explain the light coming after life?
- 📝 How is the amazement of the Jews explained by those who believe that "Render Unto Caesar" affirmed the paying of taxes?
- 📝 How do those who hold Jesus = God in the Trinitarian sense account for Paul's reticence to state this clearly and consistently?
- 📝 How do those who believe that Jesus is a created being understand the verses which say everything that was created was created by him?
- 📝 How do those who believe that the dead are conscious explain passages in Psalms that seem to suggest otherwise?
- 📝 How do those who hold Trinitarian doctrine existed from the earliest days of the church explain the lack of debate about it in the New Testament?
- 📝 How do those who hold doctrines that God is omnipotent and omniscient answer what 1 Corinthians 1:25 implies?
- 📝 Do Christians who view h*m*sexuality as a sin believe that h*m*sexuals can be freed from their sinful condition by the power of God?
- 📝 How do those who cite 2 Tim 3:16 to prove the inspiration of Scripture know that 2 Tim 3:16 is itself inspired and what is meant by "All Scripture"?
- 📝 How do those who hold to the filiquoe understand 1 Timothy 6:16?
- 📝 How do those who hold to a view of open communion practice church discipline?
- 📝 How do Protestants view "Catholic" miracles, such as those that attest to a saint?
- 📝 How do Christians who reject pre-fall death reconcile their views with the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (66 million years ago)?
- 📝 What reasons do those who reject the JEPD view of Scripture provide?
- 📝 How do Theistic Evolutionists who are Christians reconcile these Scriptures with the adoption of evolutionary theory?
- 📝 What was the difference between Ratramnus's view of the Eucharist and that of Calvin?
- 📝 The Jehovah's Witnesses deny that Jesus Christ existed eternally or everlastingly, how do they reconcile this with Micah 5:2?
- 📝 How do those who deny Jesus' pre-existence explain the large number of verses suggesting it?
- 📝 How do those who believe in salvation by grace, and in works being the fruit of salvation, explain Galatians 6:8-9?
- 📝 How do evangelical universalists reconcile their position with the designation for Judas that it would be better if he had never been born?
- 📝 How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?
- 📝 HOW does the existence of the Universe make those who do not worship God to be "without excuse"?
- 📝 How do Theistic Evolutionists reconcile that Eve was called the "the mother of all living?"
- 📝 John 1:18 - "No one has ever seen God" - How do Trinitarians reconcile this scripture with the belief that the Lord Jesus Christ is God?
- 📝 The Mormon Church teaches that Joseph Smith saw God the Father and His Son. How do you reconcile this when the Bible says the Father cannot be seen?