How do we argue when someone posits a non-causal universe
score:5
The question (currently) is unclear, but I think I can give some general advice for you to try out:
Challenge them to disprove the principle of sufficient reason.
When philosophers talk about causation, they are normally talking about the idea that everything happens for a reason. Sometimes we feel like misfortune dropped out of the blue for no reason, but all of us know that some chain of events lead to that event happening. We might never know what caused a particular event, but we generally agree that something caused it. It is, in fact, a sign of rationality to believe this.
I think the odds are very low that anyone actually believes that causeless events actually occur. Even if a person says that they deny the principle of sufficient reason, they probably behave as if there is a cause for every event. For instance, they feel safe from lightening on a clear day. So simply pointing out that denying causality is denying a foundation of reason might help clear up this point.
Determine if they believe in the static universe theory or something like it.
Until fairly recently, the state-of-the-art model of the universe was that it has always existed and can reasonably be expected to always exist. Such a universe need not have a cause because it's beginning is not an event. (This, by the way, is why God as a uncaused being is a logical possibility.) Since Edwin Hubble's great discovery, this theory has faced some serious difficulties. How does one explain the expansion of the universe without having a definite coming-into-being event? And since we believe every event has a cause (see #1), why should we make an exception for the universe itself?
Philosophically speaking, we can make an argument that the start of the universe is different. The trouble is that such an argument requires making our causality model more complex with no obvious gain except to avoid answering the question "What caused the universe?" It can be argued that that line of thinking is circular. Similarly, people get around the "problem" of the beginning of the universe with theories that account for expansion, but don't require a Big Bang. From what I can tell, these are motivated less by a desire to more accurately model the history of the universe and more by a need to find a model that satisfies the philosophical precondition of not requiring a cause for the universe.
Switch to a different tactic if you want to convince someone that God is the cause of the universe.
Going back to at least Aristotle, the question of what put all events into motion has been asked. The Philosopher's answer was, the Unmoved Mover. Naturally, us theists are quick to identify the cause of all other causes as God. But there's no particular reason to believe that. Certainly, Aristotle's students through the ages felt free to continue worshiping a variety of gods. Having convinced the other that there must exist a sufficient reason for the universe itself, neither side is compelled by the argument to except the other's given reason. A different approach must be found.
Conclusion
Personally, I've never found this type of apologetic to be helpful in "converting" someone who does not share my fundamental beliefs. We need Christian philosophers to engage on these topics as Christians, but ultimately it's God who will be able to convince people He exists, not us.
Upvote:2
This is a logical impossibility. If time had no beginning and no Beginner, then there is an infinite amount of time before now. If there is an infinite amount of time before now, we would never get to today, since you cannot traverse an infinite amount of anything.
So, it's logically absurd to suggest that time had no beginning. It did have a beginning and therefore has a cause (that is outside of time--and space and matter).
If someone is embracing logical absurdities, then rational discussion is probably not possible. You may as well suggest there both was and was not a first thing.
Upvote:4
Those that are not impressed with God's early work may be impressed with His later doings.
If find such a person who can get through Mark's Gospel without appreciating the earnestness with which the events in Jesus mission are portrayed; the rapidity of His miracles and signs; the wisdom which He chose to codify as His Gospel of love, then you've got a hard case and can probably wipe the dust from your sandals and move on.
I'm just saying, as much as its a good thing to believe in the infiteness of God, simply accepting that and becoming a deist is not the most grace ridden method for salvation.
Upvote:5
Do you mean that this person rejects the idea of causality itself? i.e. that he believes that things happen with no cause? Or that he rejects the idea that there must be a First Cause?
If he rejects causality, he is rejecting science as well as Christianity. You could, perhaps, propose experiments to show that the universe is predictable. Like, I hold a rock at arms length and let it go. Every time I perform this experiment it falls to the ground: it never hovers motionless in midair or flies off at an angle. Etc.
If he postulates an infinitely old universe as an alternative to a First Cause, I'd point out the Second Law of Thermodynamics: entropy. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but it tends to become more evenly distributed over time. After some amount of time, all the energy in the universe will become completely evenly distributed. As doing useful work requires energy differentials, at this point the universe would be dead. Physicists refer to this as "heat death". We can debate how long this will take, but it is a finite amount of time, so if the universe was infinitely old, it would have reached this state.
Some people try to get around this by postulating speculative theories, but none of these have any foundation in science: they are pure philosophical speculation. As far as the evidence goes, entropy is a well-established theory.
More post
- 📝 According to Catholicism, why do some possessed people vomit during exorcisms?
- 📝 For whom did Solomon write Proverbs?
- 📝 Is it impossible for a finite human to commit a mortal sin by its very definition?
- 📝 Do curses have any impact or effect on Christians?
- 📝 Is Isaiah telling about the antichrist?
- 📝 What should a Catholic know about Pilgrims Progress?
- 📝 What verses in the Bible indicate that Apostles expected Christ to come back very soon?
- 📝 If Satan is unable to become incarnate will he possess and control the Antichrist
- 📝 Does the Bible say that it is better to have been born after Christ?
- 📝 In the Catholic Church, what is the explanation for having, and the history behind Principal Co-Consecrators?
- 📝 If we're not specifically instructed to do something, can we?
- 📝 Is there any extra-biblical evidence that shows the apostles were martyred?
- 📝 According to the Young Earth Creationism, how is the whole earth globe after the creation of the light?
- 📝 Can a validly baptized non-Catholic commit mortal sin, thereby losing the state of grace?
- 📝 Was universalism the majority belief of the early church?
- 📝 How does mainstream Christianity view "Heaven is for Real"?
- 📝 According to the Catholic Church, do conjoined twins have two souls?
- 📝 According to Roman Catholicism, Mary loved God of her own free will. Does her love mean less to God because grace protected her from sin?
- 📝 Has it always been difficult for churches to reach the next generation?
- 📝 What is an overview of different stances on whether and why it is a sin to pay taxes?
- 📝 Does Roman Catholic doctrine recognize a moral distinction or difference between abortion and birth control?
- 📝 What was influence of Thomism on the Council of Trent?
- 📝 When did the use of formal, seminary-type education begin and why?
- 📝 Reconciling Peter in Acts with Deuteronomy/Psalms on the burden of the Law?
- 📝 What arguments were made against William Carey's missions efforts?
- 📝 Has the Catholic Church ever declared any group that identified itself Christian as not Christian?
- 📝 Do Jehovah's Witnesses use different language for theological reasons?
- 📝 Is Leviticus 18:22 condemnation of h*m*sexuality only for idolatrous rituals?
- 📝 Is Judas Iscariot ever depicted in religious art with one of those silver or gold coloured Halos?
- 📝 Anathemas concerning the soul
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do we argue when someone posits a non-causal universe
- 📝 How can apologists argue that if Jesus did not rise again then Christianity and the Church would not have lasted, when other religions have?
- 📝 How do young earth creationists reconcile the age of the universe with the speed of light, and visible distant objects?
- 📝 How could Jesus be born during the reign of Herod, and when Quirinius was governor of Syria, if those periods were not contemporary?
- 📝 When and how did men and women start sitting together in church?
- 📝 How can things considered bad when done by humans become good when God does them?
- 📝 When and how did the names Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John get attached to the gospels?
- 📝 How is it that someone who lived thousands of years ago can "represent" me?
- 📝 According to believers in the inexorable damnation of the unreached, how is God not unfair for letting someone be born in unreachable conditions?
- 📝 How should we dress when attending church?
- 📝 Is there any tradition that informs us of how old Mary was when she gave birth to Jesus?
- 📝 How far is too far when it comes to drinking alcohol?
- 📝 When the Bible says "forever," how can we tell it really means forever?
- 📝 How can we be sure our specific Christian confession is true, when every other Christian group claims that it's not?
- 📝 How old were Joseph & Mary when they marrried?
- 📝 How is Matthew 18: 8-9 explained in the context of non works-based salvation?
- 📝 How do Quakers know when to start and stop their church meetings?
- 📝 How can I be sure someone I know is going to Heaven?
- 📝 When and how did Martin Luther arrive at the justification by faith?
- 📝 When and how was the doctrine of the one divine will established?
- 📝 How can John the Baptist be the greatest man born of woman, when Jesus was also born of woman?
- 📝 How have major theological traditions handled "continuing to indulge in sin when saved?"
- 📝 How sound are the arguments that Melchizedek invoked a Canaanite deity when he met Abraham?
- 📝 How and when did the water come into being?
- 📝 How does our work on this earth transfer into the new earth when God returns?
- 📝 How does calling someone an "idiot" make one bound for Gehenna?
- 📝 How do Evangelicals explain when Paul writes "I, not the Lord"?
- 📝 HOW does the existence of the Universe make those who do not worship God to be "without excuse"?
- 📝 How and when was h*m*sexual practice separated from "h*m*sexuality"?
- 📝 The Mormon Church teaches that Joseph Smith saw God the Father and His Son. How do you reconcile this when the Bible says the Father cannot be seen?