Did the Buddha have intention (cetana)?
score:3
OP: After attaining Nibbana, did the Buddha still have intention (Cetanā)?
Yes, Lord Buddha still has intention (Cetanā) after attaining sopadhishesa-nibbana. But after attaining anupadhishesa-nibbana , everything including intention will be ceased without remainder.
Intention (Cetanā) is one of seven universal mental factors which can be seen in every consciousness. So, if there's consciousness present intention is also present. A sentient being (including Arahants) can think, speak, and do things using body because of this "cetanā" mental factor. Even-though it appears in resultant consciousness this mental factor is not manifested in those kinds of consciousness because of the weakness of its appearance with few other mental factors.
Cetana...is the mental factor that is concerned with the actualization of a goal, that is, the conative or volitional aspect of cognition. Thus it is rendered volition. The Commentaries explain that cetana organizes its associated mental factors in acting upon the object. Its characteristic is the state of willing, its function is to accumulate (kamma), and its manifestation is coordination. Its proximate cause is the associated states. Just as a chief pupil recites his own lesson and also makes the other pupils recite their own lessons, so when volition starts to work on its object, it sets the associated states to do their tasks as well. Volition is the most significant mental factor in generating kamma, since it is volition that determines the ethical quality of the action.
~ Cited form: Cetanā by Bhikku Bodhi
Intention (Cetanā) does not become kamma in every consciousness. Intention in resultant and functional consciousness don't become kamma. Intention in super-mundane consciousness can be also considered as not kamma because they ease the burden of aggregates and shorten the Samsara.
OP: For example, in the Udana 6.1 quote below, did the Buddha have the intention (Cetanā) to go and sit at the Pavala shrine on a sitting cloth with Ananda for the day's abiding?
Yes, you can understand this by the explanation I have provided above.
OP: How does the Buddha's apparent intention in Udana 6.1, not conflict with the quote from SN 12.38?
It's very hard for a worldling to imagine how Arahants think or what kind of thoughts they have. Let me explain this with an example. Suppose there are two people worship Lord Buddha at the same time. One is a worldling and the other is an Arahant. The action, "worship" can be led by the intention of "reappear in a heavenly sphere in the next existence" or "attaining Nibbana" for the worldling. But for Arahant the "intention" is none of the aforesaid. An Arahant has already done what should be done. It's hard to imagine what the intention of Arahant is.
But one thing can be assured. That is the intention of an Arahant is not associated with craving (Taṇhā), view (Diṭṭhi), and conceit (Māna).
Note: This is how I understood. I may be wrong but not Dhamma.
Upvote:0
Quoting from Respect and gratitude! ...
"One suffers if dwelling without reverence or deference."
Being aware of this situation, he searched after a solution for an awakened person:
"Now on what brahman or contemplative can I dwell in dependence, honoring and respecting him?"
Naturally not able to pick out any person which would be worthy of respect by the Tathagata, he didn't made the mistake, which many are doing today when they are lacking of an idol, to make the own, we, mine or our to the object of veneration and respect but saw the everlasting venerability legality of the natur and truth:
"What if I were to dwell in dependence on this very Dhamma to which I have fully awakened, honoring and respecting it?"
Brahma Sahampati, having recognized his line of thought and understanding this indirect question in regard of the beings of the world, if it would be of use without having a task for this world to stay further for something in it and conformed the Tathagata the use of his later 45 years of dedication for this world to maintain and explain an item of refugee and respect:
Past Buddhas, future Buddhas, & he who is the Buddha now, removing the sorrow of many —
all have dwelt, will dwell, he dwells, revering the true Dhamma. This, for Buddhas, is a natural law.
Therefore one who desires his own good, aspiring for greatness, should respect the true Dhamma, recollecting the Buddhas' Teaching.
No much to worry if wished and asked and for a good.
[Not given for trade, exchange, stacks, Buddh-ism but for release. Further questions on it and possibility to discuss, use the exit point here •]
Upvote:3
Well yeah, that impulse to go to a certain place is an example of intention. However, intention to sit in meditation, is like intention of nothing, it is an intention of dispassion, of suchness. It is not an intention to get some object or attain some goal.
As that quote says, the intention shapes our mind to become what one intends, but if one intends on peace and suchness of meditation, what does one become?
Intention to meditate is not like other intentions, because the right meditation is dispassion, is letting go. This is why it is so hard for the worldly people to meditate. Because when you meditate you don't fuel your fire, not pursuing any goal, so it goes contrary to all our habits of being driven by our projects and impulses.
So, intention that is inclined towards dispassion is not an "upadana" (fueling) intention.
Upvote:3
I'm just adding this here for completeness, but I won't accept my own answer.
“Bhikkhus, what one intends, and what one plans, and whatever one has a tendency towards (yañca ceteti yañca pakappeti yañca anuseti): this becomes a basis for the maintenance of consciousness."
“If, bhikkhus, one does not intend, and one does not plan, but one still has a tendency towards something, this becomes a basis for the maintenance of consciousness.
That is: what one intends AND what one plans AND whatever one has a tendency towards - so that means underlying tendencies (anusaya) are mandatory for the basis for the maintenance of consciousness.
So, the Buddha had intention and planning, without underlying tendencies.
Upvote:4
Arahants don't have karmic intentions and they don't seek any results. They have higher wisdom, higher goodness, higher intelligence that is not possible to measure or described by the ordinary way of thinking. The cause of their actions are not connected to any ordinary human intention, desire or mind state but it happens out of complete purity and wisdom of Nibbana. Even If an Arahant say that "It's my intention" or "It is not my intention" that's only words(which are just tools to communicate with humans) and words have limitations to explain things correctly. So obviously Buddha didn't have intentions but it is not possible to describe the root of an Arahant's actions because they attained Nibbana permanently and Nibbana is the formless state.
A part of this video(5:08-5:35) is about this subject:
More post
- 📝 Meditative-self
- 📝 What is Direct Seeing?
- 📝 What is the meaning of *suffering*?
- 📝 How does Buddhism perceive swearing or vulgarities?
- 📝 Doubt regarding correct meditation technique
- 📝 Which Hindrances are counteracted or enhance by the 37 and Jhana Factors?
- 📝 Does any/every form of lying violate the precept of "not-lying"?
- 📝 Psychic Powers and the Kevatta Sutta (DN 11)
- 📝 Laws and rules and Dhamma
- 📝 What are the cylinders in front of the Buddha statue at Nanzō-in Temple, Japan?
- 📝 What is the most accurate translation of the word 'dukkha'?
- 📝 Attacking others with words such as they are weapons
- 📝 Are there Buddhist traditions without monks?
- 📝 Conscience in Buddhism
- 📝 How should one look at buddhist mythologies and cosmologies from a scientific perspective
- 📝 If someone have experienced supernatural abilities through meditation, than why don't he shows it to world?
- 📝 Was Buddha had a expected food poisoning?
- 📝 What word is the closest to qualia
- 📝 How does an arahant know that ignorance won't return/re-arise after death?
- 📝 Enlightenment vs nibbana/nirvana
- 📝 How to combine Buddhism with being a parent?
- 📝 Consider then the magician and the philosopher
- 📝 Difference between yatha bhuta and vipassana
- 📝 Which case is "I am a professor" with identity view?
- 📝 What is a "thought?" (Particularly in reference to thoughts that arise during meditation)
- 📝 Are there any instructions on the pose of hand during meditation?
- 📝 How does the force of ones karma determine where the mind stream goes?
- 📝 Was the historical Buddha infallible?
- 📝 What is the difference between non-self and emptiness?
- 📝 What should we say when someone asks 'What is your religion?'
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Did the Buddha have intention (cetana)?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have advice about dealing with social anxiety?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have more advice for the lay follower than is typically supposed?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have long ears?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have special instructions to deal with masturbation?
- 📝 What interaction did the Buddha have with his family after leaving?
- 📝 Are monks allowed to have prescriptions? What did the Buddha say of medicine?
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever teach that we have a special responsibility to those we have injured?
- 📝 Why did the Buddha suffer before he died?
- 📝 Did the Buddha speak Pali? Are the suttas his word verbatim?
- 📝 What language did the Buddha speak?
- 📝 Did the Buddha really say that "life is suffering"?
- 📝 If there is no soul or self, why did the Buddha speak of his past lives?
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever delve on the dangers of one's own spirtual achievements feeding the ego?
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever say something proven wrong later?
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever mention the Upanishads or the Vedas?
- 📝 Why did the Buddha touch the earth at his enlightenment?
- 📝 Where did the Buddha speak of his difficulty in eating almsfood as a Bodhisatta?
- 📝 Did the Buddha say anything about attachment to meditation?
- 📝 Did the Buddha Meditate?
- 📝 Did the Buddha ever talk about his family?
- 📝 Did the Buddha discover jhana by himself?
- 📝 What did the Buddha say about music?
- 📝 Why did physical representations of the Buddha only start to appear a few centuries after his death?
- 📝 Did Buddha go through the stages of sotapanna/sakadagami/anagami before his enlightenment?
- 📝 Do enlighted people cry? Did the Buddha ever cry?
- 📝 Did the Buddha make any reference to Krishna and Gita?
- 📝 Did the Buddha discourage antropomorphic representations of himself?
- 📝 Does Pure Land Buddhism ever have a Buddha other than Amitābha as the object of devotion?
- 📝 What is Death? What did Buddha say regarding the experience of Death?