Difference between sati and sampajanna
score:5
Sati means to 'remember' (SN 48.10) or 'bring to & keep in mind' (MN 117).
Sampajana is situational wisdom; the right or thorough understanding of or for a situation.
Sampajana is from the words saṃ & pajāna (cp. pajānāti). It appears suttas such as MN 118, AN 3.121 & SN 12.28 indicate mere pajānāti might be a level of knowing or recognition that is not as complete as sampajana.
For example, in MN 118, pajānāti is only used with the most basic practise, namely, knowing long & short breathing. In AN 3.121, pajānāti is used for the recognition of the arising of defilements (which means the mind does not have thorough understanding; if defilements are arising). In SN 12.28, pajānāti of Dependent Origination is called 'one endowed with a trainee’s knowledge’; ‘one who has entered the stream of the teaching’. Thus, mere pajānāti appears different to saṃ + pajāna, namely, "thorough" or "complete" understanding.
While the suttas do not explain much about sampajana, when SN 47.35 briefly defines 'sampajana', it uses the word "vidita" (pp. of vindati), which means "to understand" or "understood", as Bhikkhu Bodhi appeared to properly translate as "understood" (and Sujato & Thanissaro improperly translated as "known").
And how, bhikkhus, does a bhikkhu exercise clear comprehension? Here, bhikkhus, for a bhikkhu feelings are understood as they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away. Thoughts are understood as they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away. Perceptions are understood as they arise, understood as they remain present, understood as they pass away. It is in this way, bhikkhus, that a bhikkhu exercises clear comprehension.
Thus, it appears obvious "sampajjana" means to thoroughly or completely understand something or a situation with right understanding rather than to have mere "bare awareness". "Bare awareness" without understanding (similar to a small child ignorantly looking non-judgmentally at the ocean, not understanding its danger) is not "sampajana".
For example, in MN 66 and SN 12.17, the word "vidita" means "to understand" rather than merely "experience with bare awareness", as follows:
Because I understand the diversity of faculties as it applies to this person.
Indriyavemattatā hi me, udāyi, imasmiṃ puggale viditā.
MN 66
However, I have recognized individual differences.
Api ca mayā puggalavemattatā viditā”ti.
SN 12.17
MN 66 & SN 12.17 seem to show Bhikkhu Sujato and particularly Bhikkhus Thanissaro (with his "bare awareness") provide inaccurate translations & explanations of SN 47.35.
In summary, sati delivers & maintains sampajjana. They work together.
Please refer to Ajahn Jayasaro You Tube or Ajahn Buddhadasa Part II. The Use of Dhamma.
Upvote:0
I believe in Pali Canon they are used synonymically.
In my understanding,
Sampajanna simply means: being self-aware, not getting carried away (esp. by emotions), paying attention to what you're doing.
Sati has a similar meaning, except the emphasis is on remembering the instructions, remembering the teaching, remembering your vows, remembering what you promised you will and won't do and why.
Upvote:1
Sati is often translated as "mindful of." So Ānāpānasati means: "mindfulness of in-and out-breathing" or "conscious of in-and-out breath" However, part of the act of doing this is partially somatic, your body experiencing itself, your emotions, thoughts, etc. experienced as they are in and of themselves. It's not a purely mental exercise. It's not reflecting on or thinking about, or placing in a conceptual context. Sati, in and of itself, can lead to a profound stillness of mind and body. Sampajañña, on the other hand, uses the mental and emotive faculties to deeply investigate, discriminate, comprehend, and reach conclusions. Principally, to deeply understand the impermanence of all things. Combined with sati, one comprehends Sunyata, emptiness, impermanence, non-existence of a permanent self, and that identifying with self or sense of permanence only leads to suffering in this life.
More post
- 📝 Is kamma the driving force behind dependent origination
- 📝 Music or ambient sounds for meditation?
- 📝 Is there a Buddhist equivalent to Marcus Aurelius' "Meditations"?
- 📝 Why can't existence be mostly good?
- 📝 Did Buddhists ever actively participate in a major violent conflict?
- 📝 Is the experience of suffering or enjoyment completely reducible to physics e.g. such as in materialist views i.e. materialism?
- 📝 Betraying People
- 📝 Did Buddha ever go outside India to teach?
- 📝 Is there a tradition or practice involving fasting in Buddhism or Buddhist countries?
- 📝 Is buddha nature active?
- 📝 How does the Bhavanga State relate to the Jhanas?
- 📝 Source of Ajahn Chah quote
- 📝 How should one be mindful of death?
- 📝 Can I call myself Buddhist? Is Buddhism a religion?
- 📝 Misconception about remembering past lives?
- 📝 Is Karma different for accidental killing than intentional killing?
- 📝 pranayama unsettles my meditation practice
- 📝 I have some people coming over who practice Buddhism, what should I know?
- 📝 Buddhism and Procrastination
- 📝 Have any historical texts identified whether a reincarnated soul's true identity can be identified?
- 📝 Do any Buddhists say that everyone's Buddha nature repeats an infinite number of times?
- 📝 Spirituality of a life from Buddhism
- 📝 How are the three marks of existence experienced through Samadhi meditation?
- 📝 *"... not the physical lama, ... but your own nature of mind ... That's the real lama ..."* Is that actually a concept in vajrayana?
- 📝 What is happening to Lord Buddha after "parinirvana"?
- 📝 How come desire and sati causes sleepness?
- 📝 Does our conventional body belong to the external sense bases?
- 📝 How do we focus on stress for the first noble truth?
- 📝 How does one understand the elements of the Pure Octad in Sunlight?
- 📝 Is there evidence of a Buddhist influence on Greek Stoicism?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Difference between sati and sampajanna
- 📝 Difference between Sampajanna and Vipassana
- 📝 Difference between Yoniso Manasikāra and Sammā sati with Sampajaññā
- 📝 What is the difference between craving and clinging?
- 📝 What is the difference between rebirth and reincarnation?
- 📝 What is the difference between relative and absolute truth in Buddhist philosophy?
- 📝 What is the difference between Vijñāna, Manas and Citta?
- 📝 What is the difference between non-self and emptiness?
- 📝 What is the difference between Satipatthana and Vipassana?
- 📝 What is the difference between samadhi and samatha?
- 📝 What is the difference between 'compassion' and 'pity'?
- 📝 What is the difference between a cula sotapanna and 'faith follower' ?
- 📝 What is the difference between 'hard' and 'soft' Jhanas?
- 📝 In the Anapanasati Sutta, what is the difference between mind and mental processes?
- 📝 Difference between Buddhism and Aristotelian "middle-way"?
- 📝 What is the difference between the progress of low and high intensive meditators?
- 📝 What's the difference between a "primordial consciousness" and a soul?
- 📝 What is the difference between a Vipassana Jhana and a Samatha Jhana?
- 📝 What is the difference between Suttas and Sutras?
- 📝 What is the difference between an arhat, bodhisattva and a buddha?
- 📝 What is the difference between right thinking and right view?
- 📝 What is the difference between concentration and mindfulness practice ?
- 📝 Difference between Attachment and Goals
- 📝 What is the difference between a Bodhisatta and a Bodhisattva?
- 📝 What is the difference between learning the Buddhist way and simply learning from life?
- 📝 What is the difference between rūpa and Kāyā?
- 📝 What is the difference between Dharmakaya and Sambhogakaya?
- 📝 Difference between "Becoming" and Anicca
- 📝 What is the difference between Anapanasati and Vipassana?
- 📝 What is the difference between fear and anxiety?