Is assault against the first precept?
score:7
The Pāḷi word for "killing living beings" is usually pāṇātipātā. It is composed by pāṇa + atipātā:
- pāṇa, in this context, is normally translated as "living being".
- atipātā is the useful word for answering the question. It can mean "killing, destroying, injuring or attacking".
Technically, it will depend on how one translates it. Either as killing\destroying or injuring\attacking. However, if one takes into account the entire Buddha's teaching it is evident, at least for me, that it means injuring\attacking, not only killing\destroying.
So I would say, yes, assault is against the first precept. However, one should always keep in mind that intention is key. One can injure a baby, for example, by extracting from his throat a swallowed toy. In such cases, I wouldn't consider it as against the first precept.
Upvote:1
Not all harmful actions fall under the five precepts. The Five Noble Precepts are the minimum conduct guidelines for a practicing Buddhist. This does not mean that violence that falls short of killing is therefore in accordance with the Buddha's teachings!
Fortunately, the Buddha's teachings are not affected by what people feel they should be. :)
Upvote:2
according to the first precept of the Buddhism, it break when a individual/animal killing another individual intentionally. for break the first precept have to completes following stages
1. there are living thing
2. think to kill that individual/animal (living thing)
3. get some action to kill
4. killing
NOTE that intention to killing is most important factor of this process. that mean if someone died and there is some connection to you about that, but if you had not any intention or though for kill him you not break the precept. NOTE if some one harm or violation on other [not killing] (intentionally), that negative harmful behavior cause to damage the precept and accumulate negative karma.
Upvote:4
The precepts are usually expressed in purely negative terms, but they are intended to express much broader positive principles. In other words, keeping the precepts is just as much about keeping the spirit of the law as it is the letter. For example, in the case of the first precept, the Buddha gives this description:
"And how is a monk consummate in virtue? Abandoning the taking of life, he abstains from the taking of life. He dwells with his rod laid down, his knife laid down, scrupulous, merciful, compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. This is part of his virtue."
(Source: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn/dn.02.0.than.html )
Assault is clearly against the positive principle in the first precept regardless of whether or not it fits within the strict wording of the precept. Hitting someone might not be classified as pāṇātipātā but it certainly is incompatible with having mercy and compassion.
Upvote:7
The following five conditions must be satisfied to break the first precept.
- The being must be alive.
- There must be knowledge that it is a living being
- There must be intention to cause its death
- Action must be taken to cause its death
- Death must result from such action
So punching someone in the nose does not break the 1st precept. But it weakens it. Since the question is if it's against(not if it breaks) the precept, the answer is yes.
Weakening here means the merits you acquire by keeping to first precept are reduced or weakened. Also, when it comes to the consequences of Kamma, Killing results in one having a short life span if born as a human again. Just injuring or torturing results in having bad health if born as a human again. killing usually involves inflicting pain or torturing as well. So it can result in bad health too.
More post
- 📝 Does the mental process of assigning subjective qualities to any phenomenon have a name in the suttas?
- 📝 Authenticity of rules for monks and nuns
- 📝 What is this saying about the relationship between Kamma and Dana?
- 📝 What do Buddhists say about illogical self sacrifice?
- 📝 Attachment and the three poisons
- 📝 If one is with firm good heart but unknowingly serves and follows unjust masters, does one still approach better in samsara?
- 📝 Is Mahayana Buddhism a form of idealism?
- 📝 Venting and Right Speech
- 📝 How do we break an attachment with the Buddha Himself?
- 📝 The Animal Plane & Evolution?
- 📝 Does downvoting an answer qualify as divisive and harsh speech?
- 📝 Did the historical Buddha explicitly teach and/or endorse Kasiṇa (meditation)?
- 📝 Are there any recollections of past lives in the more grievous realms?
- 📝 What are the relevant vinaya guidelines if a bhikkhu was to find a likely abandoned dwelling?
- 📝 How to practice ignoring identification with the body?
- 📝 Stages of the Bardo
- 📝 Is stream entry in 20 or 30 years of practice realistic?
- 📝 Why am I getting upset after meditation and sleepy during meditation?
- 📝 Bodhisattva Precepts
- 📝 Is the path an individual journey?
- 📝 Kamma and the Physical
- 📝 What does Buddhism say about the "self"?
- 📝 What is the (commentary) source for Buddha's daily schedule?
- 📝 The four requisites for trade
- 📝 When I empty out intentions and relax in meditation, what is this force that moves my body in complex patterns?
- 📝 Are there canonical texts for secular Buddhism?
- 📝 What are the occasions did Panchasika or Pansilu meet the Buddha
- 📝 Is the attempt to understand others a form of value judgement?
- 📝 Can bodhisatta reborn as mara
- 📝 Playing with sensations/heat
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is assault against the first precept?
- 📝 Does the first precept require me to check the shower for bugs and make sure to remove all of the bugs before using it?
- 📝 Not breaking the first precept vs. developing compassion
- 📝 Is drinking coffee or tea against the fifth precept?
- 📝 Found items and the Second Precept
- 📝 Why is the first lines of the Dhammapada twin verses sometimes translated using the word 'heart'?
- 📝 Can one alter the 6th precept to accommodate one's family or daily routines?
- 📝 Does the fifth precept ban smoking?
- 📝 Drunk monks and the 5th precept
- 📝 How does the first noble truth associate dukkha with each of the five skandhas?
- 📝 Was Buddhism a rebellion against the Aryans?
- 📝 How to manage insects in the house while adhering to the First Precept?
- 📝 Who were the first followers of the Buddha?
- 📝 How to complete the first Jhana?
- 📝 Does not keeping a promise violate the precept on lying? What if I promised myself?
- 📝 How do we focus on stress for the first noble truth?
- 📝 Why do you have sadness in the first Jhana?
- 📝 What do Birth, Age, and Death mean in the first noble truth?
- 📝 Does the Buddhas resolve on the night of His Nirvana go against the middle path?
- 📝 Does the second precept only apply to theft?
- 📝 What was the first Buddhist text to be translated into English?
- 📝 The Third Precept and Prostitution
- 📝 What's the first thing that arises, from which everything else arise?
- 📝 What are the reasons for and against studying other religions?
- 📝 Who was the first buddha?
- 📝 Find Sutta: eat first before hearing the teaching
- 📝 Was the London Buddhist Society the first Western Sangha?
- 📝 Was the kamikaze against the Mongol empire considered a supernatural event in Buddhism?
- 📝 Is fourth precept personal and depends on the individual?
- 📝 Doctor assisted suicide - does doctor break the first precept?