Question about Buddhism
Upvote:0
The Mahayana view is easy. Nothing would really exist or ever really happen. Time and space would be conceptual. Mind would have no reality apart from its contents. The true nature of Reality would be beyond conceptual fabrication.
Mahayana is easier to summarise than other schools because it has a clear and formal metaphysics. All positive metaphysical positions are rejected and this allows us to be quite definite about its existential claims.
It is not Idealism but may sometimes appear as 'Absolute' or 'Transcendental' Idealism (for instance see F.H.Bradley's Appearance and Reality). Rather, it reduces both Mind and Matter. It is a neutral or non-dual metaphysical theory. Not a conjectural theory (a likely story) but a descriptive and explanatory theory.
This is the only known solution for metaphysical problems and this means it is the only doctrine that accords with human reason. More generally it is known as 'non-dualism'.
Your question about the priority of Mind and Matter illustrates how this solution works. Philosophers know that the idea either Mind or Matter is fundamental does not work, rendering this an undecidable question or antinomy. This problem has baffled the scholastics for millennia. Mahayana says neither idea works because they are both wrong, and wrong metaphysical ideas never make sense in logic. This is what Nagarjuna proves in his Fundamental Verses on the Middle way, where he presents the logical and metaphysical underpinning of the Mahayana view.
Upvote:1
what I have heard in one dhammapada verse
You heard this verse wrongly. This verse says all modes of behaviour are created by mind and, when the mode of behaviour is impure, suffering follows; and when the mode of behaviour is pure, happiness follows. This Dhammapada verse is about "kamma" rather than "solipsism".
Since Buddhism teaches suffering is caused by craving, attachment & self-centredness and suffering ends when craving, attachment & selfing are abandoned, whether things exist or not is not relevant to Buddhism.
If, while he is dwelling by means of this dwelling, his mind inclines to speaking, he resolves that 'I will not engage in talk that is base, vulgar, common, ignoble, unbeneficial, that does not lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calm, direct knowledge, self-awakening or Nibbana β i.e., talk about kings, robbers, & ministers of state; armies, alarms, & battles; food & drink; clothing, furniture, garlands, & scents; relatives; vehicles; villages, towns, cities, the countryside; women & heroes; the gossip of the street & the well; tales of the dead; tales of diversity, the creation of the world & of the sea; talk of whether things exist or not.' In this way he is alert there.
More post
- π Can this question be asked?
- π Meditations on PaαΉiccasamuppΔda
- π Step siblings and relationships
- π False Virtue and True Virtue
- π What are the alternative titles of Thayodhamma Sutta, it's reference number, subsections where it appear in?
- π Does Buddhism view mind phenomena as chemical or as supernatural?
- π Meditation through clearing the mind of all thoughts
- π Is mind the most valuable thing according to the Lord Buddha?
- π How to do a long meditation of "death contemplation"?
- π What was the chronology of events in the Buddha's life?
- π Where in the VimalakΔ«rti Sutra is this stated?
- π mind is like illusionist
- π Sexual Coersion within a Sangha
- π Does Buddhism accept Existence?
- π Can I practice Buddhism without meditating?
- π Is the conventional self "conventional" in the same way as dharmas are?
- π How to achieve consciousness in nirvana?
- π Mindfulness of brain -- references?
- π How concentrated is access concentration and how would one recognise it?
- π What is dry insight?
- π Intent and Karmic benefit
- π How to accept things as-is and live according to as-is?
- π How reliable is that the Buddha actually spoke about supernatural powers?
- π What is meant by this description of a type of person in the suttas?
- π Attachment is a poison. Why is attachment to the Buddha and to Buddhist philosophy not a problem?
- π Did the Buddha speak the Mahanidana Sutta in the Digha Nikaya?
- π Sanditthika Sutta: Visible Here-&-Now
- π Purifying my mind
- π What is path and fruition?
- π How to part with potentially harmful possessions
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Question about Nichiren Buddhism
- π Question about Buddhism
- π Question about how to generate more motivation to meditate.
- π What does Buddhism literature and tradition say about transgender folks?
- π What does Buddhism say about boredom?
- π A question about sitting, movement and mindfulness
- π What does buddhism say about bodybuilding (and weights training)?
- π What does Buddhism say about how to manage other people's anger?
- π What does Buddhism say about dealing with negative people?
- π If Buddhism is about moderation, then why is it that you can attain nirvana only after renouncing worldly possessions?
- π What does Buddhism say about creativity and spiritual development?
- π What does Buddhism teach about fear of success?
- π What does Buddha and Buddhism say about fighting against enemy of dharma?
- π What does Diamond Way Buddhism say about obstacles at times of becoming more conscious?
- π Sutta Question about 4 ways of debating
- π Questions About Views in Buddhism
- π A question about DN 23 and existence of soul
- π What does Buddhism teach about energy?
- π Learning about buddhism through text only
- π What are Buddhist views about free will? Does the concept of free will vs determinism even apply? Is it a question with a wrong assumption?
- π Question about Dana
- π What does Buddhism say about the consequences of good and bad behaviour?
- π What does Buddhism say about practicing Spiritism?
- π What does Buddhism teach or say about Tolerance and accepting differences in general?
- π What does Buddhism teach about anger?
- π Resources to learn about yogacara buddhism
- π Question about Vijnana and the correct view of Nama and Rupa
- π Question about the PitΔpΕ«trasamΔgama-sΕ«tra
- π How to explain to someone with no knowledge about Buddhism what is meant by "extinguishing" the self?
- π Buddhism about the Big Bang and Science in general