Why wouldn't one say "I am the watcher"?
score:2
Identity view (i.e., "I am...") is the first lower fetter.
the mendicants who, with the ending of three fetters are stream-enterers
To say "I am the watcher" simply perpetuates identity view. Identity view is a conceptual tool. Like all tools, it can be put aside. When identity view is put aside, "there is watching." With identity view, there is a prioritization towards the self. Without identity view, broader consideration becomes the norm. With identity view, the self controls--there is struggle to use and impose will. Without identity view, experience unfolds effortlessly.
To see this, meditate "there is breathing" vs. "I am breathing". When "I am breathing" there comes a cascade of questions ("Am I breathing well?", "Should I exhale now?"). When "there is breathing", simple awareness follows the breath in and out. Effortlessly.
Relinquishing "I", we relinquish the first fetter. There is watching.
Upvote:0
Everyone can say "I am a watcher" and "There is a watcher".
But when the noble ones are saying like that, they are realizing and understanding "there are just five aggregates, which called watcher, are arising and vanishing in the dependent origination cycle".
Upvote:0
If you look very carefully, you'll see that all there is, is experience. The watcher is merely a logical inference. It's implied. We are just so used to this idea of self that we add it, we assume that experience has the one who experiences it. But the watcher is a lie, an inferred part of the experience.
Just look at your mind very carefully and you will see. The stimuli trigger associations. Then the thoughts follow one another through the mechanism of association. When you look at your mind you simply redirect attention to a different stimulus. Instead of a sensory organ the manas takes the content of Short-Term Memory as a stimulus and sends it to Long-Term Memory to seek associations. That's it, no watcher.
Upvote:1
As I currently understand with my own experience, the one who watches is just another self. The salient feature of this part of self is that it observes with no judgement, interpretation or opinion about phenomena that arise.
More post
- π Days related to Buddhism
- π Is the attempt to understand others a form of value judgement?
- π Help me with my panic attack during meditation
- π What kind of mistakes can a new meditator in his/her early 20's avoid?
- π What are: Lamrim, Dzogchen, Mahamudra
- π Is Buddhism a teaching of ethical neutrality
- π A noobs balance. Where to go on my journey?
- π Not understanding Jhana Mastery Of Reflection?
- π Where did the Buddha speak of his difficulty in eating almsfood as a Bodhisatta?
- π Changing parts of circumstances and the precept of not speaking what is not true
- π What community activities do monks in southest asia take part in?
- π How to practice βIn the seen will be merely what is seenβ
- π Doesn't pΔ«ti mean love?
- π Stages of Compassion in Mahayana
- π Does Dhp 256-257 condone judging others?
- π How can an arahant still perceive without ignorance?
- π Who gives a person wealth?
- π What is Generation Stage Meditation also known as Utpattikrama?
- π Is the path considered or viewed as being selfish?
- π All sentient beings?
- π Different Reasons of Dhamma's Decline
- π Do Buddhists claim that if there was a self it could not be annihilated?
- π Conscious death and afterlife meditation
- π Without reproducing, how is buddhism a proper belief in a world where resources are limited?
- π Is fifth precept included in the Noble Eightfold Path?
- π Can be the mind separated from the body?
- π Why the aristocrat is best of people?
- π Difference between "perception" and "view"?
- π What does Buddhism add to a Stoic?
- π Why not force awareness of things during vipassana?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Why wouldn't one say "I am the watcher"?
- π Why does Mara, the Evil One one comes looking for consciousness at death?
- π Why is "idle speech" one of the ten unwholesome actions?
- π Why is 'dukkha' included in one of the three marks of existence?
- π Why does Buddhism use the word "realm" when describing one of the different races?
- π Why did Marco Polo say the Buddhist religion originated in Sielan?
- π What do the (Pali) suttas say about "sacrifice" in general (and why it's not necessary)?
- π Where is the Buddha quoted as saying do not believe anything I say until you can prove it by yourself?
- π Why should one develop compassion?
- π Why did the Buddha suffer before he died?
- π Why does the Buddha call himself the TathΔgata?
- π Can one practice meditation to gain knowledge about the universe?
- π How does one explain consistency within phenomena if the mind generates phenomena?
- π Attachment is a poison. Why is attachment to the Buddha and to Buddhist philosophy not a problem?
- π Why would anyone ever want to go to the heavens?
- π Why is contributing to the market demand for meat not wrong?
- π Why the Buddha didn't originally allow ordination of women
- π Did the Buddha really say that "life is suffering"?
- π Why did Mahayana leave out the Pali Canon?
- π Why is the Buddha described as trackless?
- π Why should we stop the Samsara?
- π Why does the Buddha always answer a question if asked three times?
- π If there is no soul or self, why did the Buddha speak of his past lives?
- π Why is desire the root of suffering?
- π Why do Buddhists believe that the Buddha was enlightened, despite that he claimed it himself?
- π Did the Buddha ever say something proven wrong later?
- π If a Buddhist believes lay life is not ideal for the practice, why does he or she continue?
- π Why is the first lines of the Dhammapada twin verses sometimes translated using the word 'heart'?
- π Why did the Buddha touch the earth at his enlightenment?
- π Did the Buddha say anything about attachment to meditation?