Why is real magic not a good illustration to realize Truth?
Upvote:3
If Monks have compassion , which they have , then why don't they show us or show me the magic which they perfected?
It is out of compassion that the magic is NOT shown to you. I am just not finding a right reference for this sutra but I have read that the Buddha once admonished a monk showing magic to lay people saying;
Monks, attracting people to Dhamma by showing magic is like a prostitute attracting clients by pulling up her skirt.
This is a very important thing to understand, that people should come and follow the Dhamma for all the right reason and that right reason is 'to end suffering'. If monks would have started showing magic to preach Dhamma, the whole purpose of Buddha would have defeated because people should have come to Him to gain powers.
Because if they show me some real magic then my belief on the permanence of physical laws will vanish.
No that will not happen. If I will show you I can fly in the air, you won't think that gravity is impermanent, your mind will make a new idea about some physical law that was helping me levitate.
Mostly I believe in the permanence of physical laws like no person can go through a wall or that what will go up will come down or that if slapped I will be in pain...and so on... This belief in the permanence of physical laws came into existence in my consciousness as given the exact causes exact similar things were happening since I took birth. Real Magic will break that belief.
This is the same question you were asking about Gravity. No, with seeing real magic your belief in permanence will not fade, you will, in fact, start believing in some other strange things, and this time they will be strange. And further you will start craving for that magical power instead of the Dhamma.
And once I my faith in the absoluteness of the laws of Universe is broken I will start questioning the reality. I will start asking what all in not permanent ? I will start wondering if Universe doesn't work by those laws then which laws ? Should I conclude there is no permanent law ? Desire for investigating will develop as desire of investigation is one the 7 factors of awakening.
You have already known that things around you are not permanent, is that not enough for you to develop the desire of investigation into Dhamma?
Further, I will state that the laws of physics that you are pointing out is not something you can ascribe the quality of being permanent or impermanent. I will like you to read the book called The Science Delusion nu Rupert Sheldrake. In that, he has shown that even the speed of light that is held constant is in fact not really constant. That book has answers you are looking for and not levitating monks.
Therefore for the sake of humanity why don't Monks show magic and convert the lay people into Buddhism?
For the sake of humanity, they are NOT showing the magic. That's not how you convert people and convert into what?
In short, why real magic is not a good illustration to make one realize the Truth of impermanence of all physical Truths.?
You are misunderstanding 'physical truth' with the description of processes. The physical truth like a gross body can be clearly seen as impermanent and the truth like 'law of gravity' is a description of the process which itself is proof of impermanence. The law is the proof you are asking proof of the proof.
Real magic will lead you astray, it's for the street shows not for the Dhamma.
More post
- π Different meditation approaches within Theravada
- π What is the most βgenuinely Buddhistβ kind of mindfulness?
- π Does feeding animals with dead chicks and live worms break precepts?
- π Are Bodhisattvas real human beings we can encounter?
- π Praying to a Buddhist deity for healing of someone
- π Helpful or ego-stroking?
- π What does mass donation of the Dhamma mean?
- π Are there any scientifically validated practices for Buddhists?
- π Is it moral to trade goods?
- π Is a via positiva, cataphatic definition of NibbΔna possible?
- π Buddhist point of view in the research process
- π Sankhara conditions vinjana dependent origination
- π Does Vajrayana Buddhism incorporate the use of cannabis?
- π Does the aggregate of consciousness depend on the aggregates of sensation, perception and mental formations?
- π Good website for sutta learning?
- π Lower realms rising?
- π Being assertive/manipulative
- π Dhammapada is not "a teaching of the Buddha himself"?
- π Spontaneous Formation of Mandalas
- π What is difference between Nibbana and asaαΉ khataαΉ (unconditioned)?
- π What really Sekha means?
- π Why did Buddha choose sacred fig for meditating and austerity?
- π Once ignorance is removed ,is the cessation of suffering automatic?
- π Are the terms "yoga" and "yogi" used in Buddhism?
- π Is forgiving someone an issue in Buddhism and what does it mean?
- π How do I practice Buddhism to attain peace of mind and know the inner self?
- π When Zen monks are completing a task, why are they doing it very quickly?
- π Evil Buddha, anyone?
- π how do we know about parts of Buddha's life where he was clearly alone?
- π Western scholars: Did the Buddha not speak the Digha Nikaya?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Why is real magic not a good illustration to realize Truth?
- π Why does the third noble truth not include the ten fetters?
- π Why is Buddhism not Nihilism?
- π If Rebirth is not taken literally then why seek Enlightenment?
- π Why not kill animals to hasten their rebirth?
- π Attachment is a poison. Why is attachment to the Buddha and to Buddhist philosophy not a problem?
- π Why is contributing to the market demand for meat not wrong?
- π If a Buddhist believes lay life is not ideal for the practice, why does he or she continue?
- π Is there any explanation on why only humans and animals do not remember previous life?
- π Why does 'thoughts' and 'memories' not part of aggregates?
- π Not getting what one wants as a good thing or something to be thankful
- π Good is not different from Bad?
- π There is a text where Buddha says that the Dharma he teaches is not a secret doctrine so why are there sects which maintain secrecy?
- π Why should one not address a venerable as friend?
- π Why should I focus on that which is not mine?
- π Why island and not light?
- π Why our mind always live in habits? Why we are always making new habits? What will happen if habits are not formed?
- π Sunyata is the truth and compassion is not an illusion?
- π How can you use Q&A to gain good Karma and also aid to realize liberation
- π If I am not the skandhas, then what entity/group of entities am I being responsible for by being a good person?
- π Why will-power could not be used to regulate kaya , vedana and citta?
- π Why is 'do not be unfair' not a precept? And some related questions on precepts
- π Why intake of intoxicating substances is not included in 10 unwholesome actions?
- π Why must we not wear a hat or cap when listen or teach Dhamma?
- π Why the view "I am the owner of my karma" not contradict anatta?
- π Why are plants not sentient beings?
- π How to overcome fear of annihilation in meditation and why is it not included in list of hindrances to meditation?
- π Why is samghabedabastu section of the mulasarvastavadin monastic code not published in any language besides it's original language?
- π Why Buddha was not worried about his family after enlightenment?
- π Why is swastika in buddhism is in this ε format and not in this ε format? What is the difference between the two? What is the meaning of each sign?