Kamma and (psychiatric) delusions / madness
Upvote:0
I'm not sure I agree with jathin's answer. There was a case in my country a few years ago, where someone on a bus cut off someone else's head. They did that, because they thought that they were sitting next to a devil. The criminal justice trial found them "not guilty of murder by reason of diminished responsibility", they were remanded for psychiatric care, and later released (with anti-psychotic medication).
I'm not sure I know about kamma but I think that intention follows from view, and if your view is psychotic (e.g. if you think you're sitting next to a devil) then I'm not sure. I slightly doubt whether Buddhism would recommend you kill even a "devil" if you meet one: but still.
I think that the Vinaya (see page 74 through 86) identifies what constitutes murder:
- Object: the victim must have been human
- Intention and perception: the assailant must have intended to cause death
- Effort: the assailant must have done something to cause death
- Result: the victim had to actually die as a result
I'm not sure whether the Vinaya rule is the same as "kamma", but I'd argue that psychosis may prevent intention and/or perception.
In my country, an adult who is psychotic may be given a court-appointed legal guardian -- that is, if they're unable to make informed decisions, if they cannot give informed consent, because they are:
- Unable to understand the choices available to them
- Unable to understand the likely consequences of each choice.
The first story of the Dhammapada is about someone who couldn't see with their eyes. Maybe someone with psychosis cannot properly see with their mind (and cannot form criminal intent).
Upvote:2
"The Pali term Karma literally means action or doing. Any kind of intentional action whether mental, verbal, or physical, is regarded as Karma"
You have to look at the action (good or bad) and the consequence( Kamma & vipaka). whether one has a sound mind or unsound mind doesn't matter, without intention there is no action.
Even a person suffering from psychosis uses his mind to do things, so without thoughts nothing good or bad happens( the thoughts may be abnormal,incomplete,unclear or confusing) ,but a person with psychosis may not feel the consequences like a normal person ,so the magnitude of suffering may differ for the same actions committed by different people.
More post
- π Why does my mind naturally wander?
- π Does Mahayana Buddhism discourage attaining enlightenment under the Gautama Buddha Sasana?
- π Impermanence: How do we know when a thing ends or if it's just changing?
- π Family feuds... is there a path that walks through the fire without burning oneself?
- π Buddhism and misanthropy
- π Feeling of unbecoming & losing I-hood
- π Dejection and Sensuality
- π Does duαΈ₯kha apply to animals too?
- π How do I become a Saddhanussari or Dhammanussari and know if I have attained it?
- π Do buddhists believe that time travel will ever be possible?
- π What is the meaning of 'compounded' & 'uncompounded'?
- π Can a person with harmful thoughts still meditate?
- π Did the Buddha have more advice for the lay follower than is typically supposed?
- π Once nirvana is reached is there any connection to earth available?
- π If one's inner monologue stops forever, is one necessarily an arahant?
- π Concentration as a Trait
- π Mention of Saraswathi river in Buddhist scriptures
- π Not understanding Jhana Mastery Of Reflection?
- π What is Aarya Upavaada?
- π What is the difference between mindfulness and detachment?
- π Why did Buddha continue jhΔna after enlightenment?
- π Remaining in first jhana, while walking, talking, eating
- π How or why do arahants not experience aging & death?
- π Buddhist "code of ethics" on talking about other religions
- π Is the seer and seen different? Example i saw tree . tree and "me" are different? Or tree and "me" are same?
- π Is allowing or seeking detachment a bad karmic influence vis a vis rebirth?
- π Playing with sensations/heat
- π Marriage and p**n
- π Pure Perception
- π Do you know of ways to financially support the Sangha?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Kamma and (psychiatric) delusions / madness
- π Kamma and right livelihood in a modern business environment
- π About mental diseases and kamma
- π Feelings and kamma and sankhara , am I bound for the rest of my life
- π The illusions and delusions of the world
- π Isn't giving to attain good Kamma "greedy" and therefore Unwholesome (akusala)?
- π What is this saying about the relationship between Kamma and Dana?
- π Kamma and sankharas
- π Hereditary illness and kamma
- π Can the same kamma cetana and action lead to somewhat different future physical consequences (the physical aspect of the kamma-vipaka)
- π Visual representation of mind and kamma
- π No more kamma and vipaka for Noble Ones?
- π Kamma and the Physical
- π Is killing vermin and insects justifiable?
- π What are the differences between vipassana and mindfulness meditation?
- π Relationship with bad parents (kamma and issues)
- π Are Vajrayana and Tibetan Buddhism the same thing?
- π Comparison of Nirvana, Tao and Brahman/Atma
- π How to deal with people and handle rude language?
- π As a Buddhist with a Muslim family, community, and background... how do you integrate/cope?
- π How concentrated is access concentration and how would one recognise it?
- π How are 'conceit' and 'identity-view' not the same?
- π Meditation and 'not trying to change anything'
- π How do I slow down and start living according to my values? How do I change the direction of my life?
- π Does studying mathematics or science lead to a practitioner of Buddhism acquiring wrong philosophical views and mental afflictions?
- π How compatible are the beliefs of atheists and Buddhism?
- π Strange feelings after meditation and mindfulness practice?
- π What is the difference between craving and clinging?
- π What are the differences/similarities in the concept of faith as used in Buddhism and Christianity?
- π What's Buddhism view on choice, choicelesness and causality?