Upvote:4
The 'problem' (or feature, depending on your timing) with flightfox, darjeelin and others is that you're relying mostly on part-time experts looking for flights for you. So if you pick the wrong time, it may take a while to get someone on to look at it for you.
Also, and I found this especially with flightfox when I was an expert there, complex flights tend to get less attention from the experts unless there's some more money involved.
It comes down to cost-benefit. If you're an expert and you have an hour to search some flights, you're going to look at the ones you think you can do well and get cash for. So for me, when I saw a south Pacific one, I'd usually target it as I know a few little lesser-known sites and airlines. I also know tricks in South America. Europe the competition is just crazy, so I'd often avoid those - and there were too many little weird details - some people would be fine with a RyanAir airport (eg Vienna's one is in a different country - Bratislava, Slovakia!), while others wouldn't be, some would be ok with trains, etc etc, and then you had to factor in trains or boats as an alternative - it was messy.
So my suggestions from my time in it, as an expert wanting to get a win:
Also, consider posting in the chat sometimes. Occasionally one of us will be in a price-hunting mood, and happy to help!
Upvote:5
Speaking as an expert, there are several problems with the concept of Darjeelin:
The expert's work is not rewarded, unless the customer buys an option
As the fee for creating a price check is very low (1,5€) there are a lot of price checks, of which only a very low percentage actually buy an option (I think around 10%). A lot of customers invest only 1.5€ and several hours of work won't be rewarded at all. (Good) experts are not willing to work for that little money.
4 hours is too short
If you open a price check at 2am UTC, chances are very high that you won't receive any options, because most of the experts are European.
So it's possible that one expert knows a trick for your route, but he can't submit a proposal, because he won't ever see your price-check.
The price to beat requires the customer to search for flights
The price for buying a proposal depends on the difference between the customer's price and the expert's price. The customer tries to set a low price to beat in order to save money by looking for cheap flights. That way he works against the expert. At the same time the expert does not put much effort in searching if the price to best is low. The result is lower quality of the proposals.
In my opinion the old modell of flightfox delivered better results for the customer and was more attractive for experts. In order to attract best experts, you need to pay the fee upfront, so it is assured that the best proposal will actually earn some money (unless the experts cant find a better option).
Unfortunately they changed their business model and got rid of a lot of experts (including me).
The only website that offers real Crowdsourcing on flights and is still attractive for experts is Chimpando. Unfortunately there are not many requests yet.