Why does the monarchy of Belgium still exist after Leopold 2?
score:9
As a starting point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Free_State#Humanitarian_disaster - which is a reason why Leopold was put in the "ranking " you've pasted.
There's a simple reason Belgium is still a monarchy: because there was no political reason for changing the state of affairs - this idea did not occur neither to public opinion nor to international community (other states' diplomacy) of that time. What's more, as a King of Belgians, Leopold is generally regarded positively. Also after his death, there never was a need for republic, Belgians were content enough with their royalty.
And why did Leopold got away with all these atrocities?
They happened in Africa, in wild, no-man's land. What would be the legal base for the prosecution? What's more, to organize the investigation and trial, unprecedented diplomatic action would have needed to be taken, action for which you'd need approval of diplomacies of all other colonial powers. None of these diplomacies did ever conceive such idea - most of the colonial states were monarchies - and who except the revolutionaries have ever put the kings on trials? Putting things simply, all European monarchs are related to each other, in the monarchical times it was simply unthinkable to organize such a lawsuit for a king.
So summing up:
- Belgium is still a monarchy, because Belgians were always content enough with their monarchs (despite the atrocities commited in the overseas collonies).
- Leopold was never held responsible for Congo disaster because:
- there was no legal basis for accusing him of anything,
- other states diplomacies had no reason to trouble him
Upvote:3
"The gentleman will never notices what happens on the backyard of another gentleman". The victims were not Europeans, so they were not taken into account. Leopild II was not alone - all colonial powers behaved the same. Vietnam, Boer republics, Sudan and so on.
But Leopold was not a dictator. He was a constitutional monarch and the quilt is on the whole nation and its elite, of course. So, it is not as if he alone killed or even ordered to kill these 15mil. personally.
If at the end of XIX cent the killing of blacks were considered a crime, it would be very probable that Belgians would accuse their king of being a cruel dictator - in order not to be accused themselves. But the simply didn't have any need in it. So they let the dynasty be.
As for the second reason, Belgians won. All crimes are timed out very fast, when it is convinient for winners. And who would ask for the opinion of these, who lost? At maximum, to make them quiet, the history would be cottected and recalling of unconvenient truth would be considered as "a bit insensitive". Excellent formulation, really!
What were the numbers of victims of British and French colonizators? I think, it was Leopold there instead of Victoria, for example, only because Belgium is such a small country.
Upvote:4
My relatives are Belgian, and you might want to note that they are very fond of their current monarch. The question seems a bit insensitive.
Putting that aside, why would you end a monarchy because one of the monarchs performed atrocities? What relationship is there between the monarch's morality and the legitimacy of the monarchy? Would you end the US government if one of the presidents were discovered to have colluded with press to deceive the American public about his fitness to rule (Roosevelt), or if the President's cabinet had conspired to fix the outcome of the Electoral College (Washington), or if the President invited a foreign power to establish armed forces inside the United States with the goal of overthrowing the government (Jefferson)?
I think if we explore any royal lineage we'll find some monsters; Leopold may be a bit in the extreme, but StackExchange has recently examined Henry V. I thought I'd find other SE examples, but a quick search didn't reveal any. (Ivan the Terrible comes to mind). Most royal lines also include a few heroes. Leopold III's decision to remain in Belgium during the Nazi occupation comes to mind, or Baudoin's day long abdication to avoid a personal crisis over abortion rights. Please note that I'm not trying to assert any sense of scale or comparison, nor am I trying to defend Leopold II in any way.
Ultimately the legitimacy of a royal line does not depend on the morality of the predecessors. (Discussion of what constitutes legitmacy of a royal line is probably out of scope for SE).
Upvote:9
The killings to which they are doubtless referring occurred as part of his ownership of the Congo Free State. They all happened in Africa, and the deaths seem to have been the result of a rather abusive form of slave labor that was employed to keep productivity there high. The wikipedia page says that estimates range from 2 to 14 million deaths, but there's really no certianty involved in those numbers, as no records were kept, and Congo in the 19th century wasn't eactly the kind of place prone to gather census figures.
However, this was all completely aside from the fact that Leopold happened to be the king of a European nation. The CFS was owned by Leopold personally, and the profits went to enrich himself, not his country.
That particular graphic seems to have taken a very high estimate and used it as an absolute number. If they did that with everybody on the list, I suppose you can at least get a good relative sense, but still I find that a little dishonest.
If you truly "don't know a lot about history", there is one thing I'd like you to take away from this: be careful, because everybody has an angle. History is little better than politics in this regard.
More post
- 📝 Why did wheat become the dominant food culture?
- 📝 Where was the Turkish Navy based in July 1914?
- 📝 Were the Puritans for a State Church?
- 📝 What was Gen. Buford's ultimate objective at the Battle of Gettysburg?
- 📝 Why did this anti-communist pamphlet, from the USA in the 1950s, include UNESCO among its targets?
- 📝 What was the name for the region before it was "the Balkans"?
- 📝 When and why was the 55th parallel established as an administrative boundary in Quebec?
- 📝 How Many German Born American Citizens served for the U.S. in World War II?
- 📝 Was the location of the 180° line of longitude coincidence or deliberately chosen?
- 📝 Just how fanciful is Egyptology?
- 📝 By which year did smiths achieve the ability to handle metal in an exact way that's necessary for the printing press?
- 📝 Why acquire real vs forged signatures?
- 📝 Where in San Francisco did the Land Commission meet?
- 📝 What East German laws and regulations were extended to the West after unification?
- 📝 When did the tilt of the tower of Pisa become seen as a feature instead of a defect?
- 📝 Did Robert Devereux's monopoly on sweet wine encroach upon Sir Christopher Hatton's monopoly on wine?
- 📝 During WW2, what B-29 crew role did the abbreviation EMG mean?
- 📝 Why did Abraham Lincoln choose Andrew Johnson as a vice presidential running mate?
- 📝 ut and et in the third Dicta Patricii of the Book of Armagh
- 📝 Why could the Soviet Baltic fleet not break out of the Gulf of Finland
- 📝 British Warships and Their Crew In Hawaii in the Mid-1800s
- 📝 Who was the oldest woman that we know of to give birth in the Medieval Europe?
- 📝 How much leisure time was enjoyed by English peasants in the 16th century?
- 📝 What is the use of vinegar as a component in ancient ink receipes?
- 📝 Why was there such tension between the Ottoman Empire and Russia during the Armenian genocide?
- 📝 Is the first visually recorded use of anti-cavalry defences on the Bayeux Tapestry?
- 📝 How did the Allies communicate during World War II?
- 📝 How did the triple entente manage such a large breakthrough in WW1?
- 📝 Why were the West African islands uninhabited?
- 📝 Can it be claimed there were Bulgarians in the Balkans before 681 AD?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why does the monarchy of Belgium still exist after Leopold 2?
- 📝 Why was King Leopold III so hated in Belgium after the Second World War?
- 📝 Why does the King of Spain still claim defunct titles like the King of Hungary?
- 📝 Why does Japan celebrate the Gregorian New Year but China still celebrates Chinese New Year?
- 📝 Why did monarchy become common practice after the fall of Rome?
- 📝 Why were blacks still victimized in the Northern states after slavery's abolition?
- 📝 Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union when he was still busy fighting the United Kingdom?
- 📝 Why does the United States keep using "old" date representations and imperial system, while being in the minority?
- 📝 Why did the British scuttle the u-boats surrendered after WWII?
- 📝 Why did stock brokers go bankrupt after the crash of 1929?
- 📝 Why does Japan use the same type of AC power outlet as the US?
- 📝 If the Union Jack joins the flag of England and Scotland, why does it have a different shade of blue than the Scottish flag?
- 📝 Why didn't the USA move to the left after WWII?
- 📝 Why does German money from the 1940s not bear Nazi symbols?
- 📝 Why were the drawings of Colossus burnt after WW2 and why was its very existence "of course" kept secret?
- 📝 Why could China keep most of the lands it conquered after 17th century but European powers could not?
- 📝 Why didn't Hannibal attack Rome after the Battle of Cannae?
- 📝 Why does the Great Wall of China follow such a bendy route?
- 📝 Why does the US use the opposite convention to the rest of the world for colour-coding harbour buoys?
- 📝 What date does a 1738 British author intend by "soon after the revolution"?
- 📝 Why did the Soviet Union not "grant" Inner Mongolia to Mongolia after World War Two?
- 📝 Why does the CIA report on the assassination of Reinhard Heydrich refer to it as "Operation Salmon" rather than "Operation Anthropoid"?
- 📝 Why does the amount of days in an year on average of the Gregorian calendar only have 4 decimal places (365.2425)?
- 📝 Why did the Turks adopt the Latin alphabet after WWI?
- 📝 Why did Latin disappear so completely in Britain after the Romans left?
- 📝 Why was the British army so short of rifles after Dunkirk?
- 📝 Why didn't mercenary combat after the middle ages lead to the collapse of the ruling class?
- 📝 Why was the last battle of the War of 1812 fought fully half a year after the official end of the war?
- 📝 Why did the French insist on reclaiming Indo-China after WWII?
- 📝 Why did Germany decide not to restore the Hohenzollern dynasty to the throne of a German Empire after the defeat of Hitler in World War Two?