Were certain soldiers considered to be neutral by both sides?
score:6
Yes, there may be "soldiers" considered neutral - even if they are members of armed forces, provided that their sole duty was medical aid for the wounded ("ambulances"). The seminal document is the "initial" Geneva Convention 1864 ("Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field"), initiated by Henry Dunant, after the cruel battle of Solferino.
Excerpt from the 1864 convention:
Art. 1. Ambulances and military hospitals shall be recognized as neutral, and as such, protected and respected by the belligerents as long as they accommodate wounded and sick. Neutrality shall end if the said ambulances or hospitals should be held by a military force.
Art. 2. Hospital and ambulance personnel, including the quarter-master's staff, the medical, administrative and transport services, and the chaplains, shall have the benefit of the same neutrality when on duty, and while there remain any wounded to be brought in or assisted.
Art. 3. The persons designated in the preceding Article may, even after enemy occupation, continue to discharge their functions in the hospital or ambulance with which they serve, or may withdraw to rejoin the units to which they belong. When in these circumstances they cease from their functions, such persons shall be delivered to the enemy outposts by the occupying forces.
(...)
Art. 6. Wounded or sick combatants, to whatever nation they may belong, shall be collected and cared for. (...) Evacuation parties, and the personnel conducting them, shall be considered as being absolutely neutral.
Art. 7. A distinctive and uniform flag shall be adopted for hospitals, ambulances and evacuation parties. It should in all circumstances be accompanied by the national flag. An armlet may also be worn by personnel enjoying neutrality but its issue shall be left to the military authorities. Both flag and armlet shall bear a red cross on a white ground.
In 1949, four conventions ("Geneva Conventions") laid the base for international humanitarian law, including provisions regarding the treatment of the wounded as well as the status of medical units.
Here are two excerpts from the first of the 1949 conventions ("Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field"):
ARTICLE 15 At all times, and particularly after an engagement, Parties to the conflict shall, without delay, take all possible measures to search for and collect the wounded and sick, to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment, to ensure their adequate care, and to search for the dead and prevent their being despoiled. Whenever circumstances permit, an armistice or a suspension of fire shall be arranged, or local arrangements made, to permit the removal, exchange and transport of the wounded left on the battlefield. Likewise, local arrangements may be concluded between Parties to the conflict for the removal or exchange of wounded and sick from a besieged or encircled area, and for the passage of medical and religious personnel and equipment on their way to that area.
(...)
ARTICLE 19 Fixed establishments and mobile medical units of the Medical Service may in no circumstances be attacked, but shall at all times be respected and protected by the Parties to the conflict. Should they fall into the hands of the adverse Party, their personnel shall be free to pursue their duties, as long as the capturing Power has not itself ensured the necessary care of the wounded and sick found in such establishments and units. The responsible authorities shall ensure that the said medical establishments and units are, as far as possible, situated in such a manner that attacks against military objectives cannot imperil their safety.
Regarding journalists / reporters, the situation isn't as clear as regarding ambulances. Actually, they are considered as civilians or non-combatants and protected as such (on the basis of current international humanitarian law). Attacks on civilian journalists is explicitly condemned by the UN security council (see resolution 1738, dating from 2006).
Upvote:4
I think you are talking about World War I, not World War II.
Removing bodies from no-man's land sometimes occurred, but only if it was specifically arranged and a deal was made. If anybody or anything, medic or otherwise went into no-man's land without a temporary truce in place they were liable to be shot.
It's very difficult to tell who somebody is from 500 yards away. At that distance you just look like a dot. Without a truce, not only could you get shot, you could get shot by your own friends or other soldiers on the same side as you.
More post
- 📝 What were the 20th century historical disputes?
- 📝 Battle of Queenston Heights, 13 Oct 1812: 23 American soldiers held as British deserters
- 📝 Between which years did a trend of violence toward h*m*sexuals begin and end in America?
- 📝 What was the Hospitaller gonfalon like in the 12th and 13th centuries?
- 📝 How is it possible to be ambushed twice at the same place?
- 📝 Help identifying a strange uniform jacket
- 📝 Did Hitler ever tell a joke?
- 📝 Given that there were there larger, more organised civilisations in South America compared to NA, why did they not colonise North America themselves?
- 📝 Why was the Ottoman flag changed from an eight-pointed star to five-pointed in the 19th century?
- 📝 Mesoamerican and Giza's Pyramids
- 📝 How was the relation between the Ottoman Empire and Serbia, Greece, and Montenegro during the Second Balkan War?
- 📝 Why were the Romans unable to conquer Germania?
- 📝 Where was human history first purposely recorded?
- 📝 Is the Visigoth cultural and historical influence within Spain rarely acknowledged?
- 📝 What are canonical sources about fifth century BCE Athens?
- 📝 Has Saudi Arabia ever been invaded?
- 📝 Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?
- 📝 Who were the successors of the Roman Empire?
- 📝 What was the legal process of raising a legion in late Republican Rome?
- 📝 Did James I link the divine right of kings to apostolic succession in his writings? If so, where?
- 📝 What are the counterarguments to calling German nazism a right-wing movement?
- 📝 Military intervention in government in India and Pakistan
- 📝 When and how did Thailand cease to be Siam and become the modern Thailand?
- 📝 What was the internal Soviet reaction to the moon landing?
- 📝 When did it become popular to drop the A.D. in dates?
- 📝 Did families heading west ever settle along the Oregon Trail (instead of at the final destination)?
- 📝 Were Americans concerned about "Overlord" code words in Daily Telegraph crosswords?
- 📝 What happened in 1914 that ended the golden age of microbiology?
- 📝 Were Roman marching songs still bawdy during principate/dominate?
- 📝 Where did the railroad companies find workers to build the rails?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Were certain soldiers considered to be neutral by both sides?
- 📝 Why were Spain and Portugal neutral / not invaded in WWII?
- 📝 Were there any high-ranking female soldiers during the Middle ages?
- 📝 In Antiquity, were Persian arrows considered superior to their Greek counterparts?
- 📝 Were there any crops and livestock common to both the Old and New Worlds prior to the Columbian exchange?
- 📝 Were soldiers in the World Wars paid?
- 📝 What were the individual soldiers motivated by during World War 1?
- 📝 Were Roman emperors officially considered kings of Egypt?
- 📝 What alternative locations were considered for the United Nations?
- 📝 What benefits were there to the USA of developing both Uranium and Plutonium bombs in World War 2?
- 📝 Were the Hashemite kings of Iraq and Transjordan considered foreign?
- 📝 Did medieval archers shoot from both sides of the bow?
- 📝 Did the Persian Empire really finance both sides of the Peloponnesian war?
- 📝 Were mounted soldiers really an advancement during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 How many soldiers were present at the charge down Little Round Top?
- 📝 Did one or both sides of the cold war plan to strategically attack the others' food production?
- 📝 When were soldiers compensated with land grants?
- 📝 When were both minuscule and majuscule letters used for the first time in the same Latin manuscript?
- 📝 Were the Quebecois ever considered higher-class because they spoke French?
- 📝 How were German soldiers chosen to be flown out of Stalingrad?
- 📝 What were the needs of the US Navy that resulted in the production of both the Arleigh Burke class and Ticonderoga class in the 1980s?
- 📝 How well were the African soldiers equipped in the civil war?
- 📝 What "class" of soldiers were these soft targets?
- 📝 During the Siege of Alesia, why were certain Roman forts located outside the circumvallation lines?
- 📝 Were the popes during the Avignon era still considered bishop of Rome?
- 📝 How were soldiers positioned on a platoon-sized amphibious landing craft in WWII?
- 📝 How "excellent" were relations between American soldiers and the Vietnamese people?
- 📝 Was there ever a situation where members of two warring militaries were on leave in the same neutral location?
- 📝 How did knights in full suits of armor eventually die in combat? What were the most common causes of death for soldiers in full-body plate armor?
- 📝 Why were Red Army Officers and soldiers not prosecuted for War Crimes in WWII?