Why did the United States not seriously develop Anti Aircraft Missiles?
score:18
In fact, the U.S. did do a lot of work on AA missile systems, chiefly the Nike program. This included the Nike Ajax, Nike Hercules, and Nike Zeus. The latter was expected to counter ICBM launches. The program was scrapped in 1965 when it was determined that Soviet ICBMs would ultimately overwhelm any defenses, and that the only real defense was the MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) doctrine, the same strategy that was lampooned in Dr. Strangelove. Also, the experiment was costly, delivering less bang for the buck (pun intended) than the administration could stomach, and defense funds were prioritized elsewhere, including to the burgeoning war in Vietnam.
Here are a few excerpts from an interesting website that describes the Nike Missile System:
Nike, named for the mythical Greek goddess of victory, was the name given to a program which ultimately produced the world's first successful, widely-deployed, guided surface-to-air missile system. Planning for Nike was begun during the last months of the Second World War when the U.S. Army realized that conventional anti-aircraft artillery would not be able to provide an adequate defense against the fast, high-flying and maneuverable jet aircraft which were being introduced into service, particularly by the Germans.
[...]
The first successful test firing of a Nike missile occurred during 1951. This first Nike missile was later given the name Nike "Ajax". Nike Ajax was a slender, two-stage guided missile powered by a liquid-fueled motor utilizing a combination of inhibited red fuming nitric acid (IRFNA), unsymmetrical dimethyl hydrazine (UDMH) and JP-4 jet petroleum. The Ajax was blasted off of its launcher by means of a jettisonable solid fuel rocket booster which fired for about 3 seconds, accelerating the missile with a power of 25 times the force of gravity.
[...]
The shifting nature of the Soviet threat meant that the air defense role, for which Nike was originally intended, became relatively less critical as time passed. Defense dollars were needed for other projects (including the development of American ICBMs and potential missile defenses) and also to fund the rapidly growing war in Vietnam.
The picture above may also be found at the linked site.
Upvote:0
The United States did have a large system of anti-aircraft missiles. There was a image problem. For the system to be effective there needed to be a lot of them and they were needed to be around the cities. As the anti-war movement grew the missiles became a nearby symbol of the military to protest. Then was the issue or nukes on them. Some of the anti-aircraft missiles had nukes installed on them to stop incoming warheads or formations of bombers. Which missiles had the nukes were not public so every anti-aircraft missiles was suspect. This added the anti-nuke protest. Plus there was a whole controversy between the Airforce and the Army. Each was claiming they should be solely in charge of the anti-aircraft missiles for the nation and doing their utmost to make the others efforts sound like a waste of time. Which mainly sullied the whole idea of anti-aircraft missiles in the public mind. Eventually as part of a whole change in public opinion a great number of programs related to anti-aircraft missiles, bomb shelters, anti-ballistic missiles, and even a lot of radar installations were canceled.
As a historically side not there was the objections to antiaircraft guns being put up in some parts of Great Britain right before the start of WW2 and there is the current controversy with THAAD in South Korea. The aircraft were lost to SAMs in the Vietnam war and the losses Israel had in the Yom Kippur war demonstrated SAMS work. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_losses_of_the_Vietnam_War][1] Which is why The United States continued to develop portable systems like Patriot surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, which can be set up as needed.
Upvote:0
One point to consider... while the US did develop quite a few AA missiles during the Cold War: Bomarc, Ajax, Hawk, etc... they never got much publicity because they weren't used.
The Soviet SAM-2 became famous because it was actually used a lot... to shoot down a U2 (over their territory), in Vietnam, and in Egypt and Syria during the 1973 Yom Kippur war.
What is remembered about the US and AA missiles during that time, is the countermeasures they developed: Radar jammers, missiles that homed in on SAM radar (HARM: high speed anti radar), units trained to destroy SAMs (the Wild Weasels) and aircraft that could either outrun SAM's (the SR71) or aircraft that couldn't be found by SAM's (the F117 and B2).
To date, only one US AA missile has ever received any degree of publicity: the Stinger, as supplied to the opposition forces in Afghanistan during the Soviet intervention there.
That tells us quite a bit about who was on the offensive, and who was on the defensive, during that time.
Upvote:4
The US developed many and very effective AA missiles. BOMARC was an early example and remained in service for over 20 years.
Redeye, Stinger, Hawk, Nike, Patriot, THAAD, Terrier, Talos, Tartar, Standard, Spartan, Sprint, the list goes on and on.
And that's just SAM systems, doesn't include AAM systems, of which several (Sparrow, AMRAAM, ASRAAM, Sidewinder) have found use as SAMs as well.
Of course the number of different systems doesn't come close to the number of different systems employed by the USSR at one time or another, but that's in no small part because of different design and numbering philosophies. When the Soviets designed a new system they usually started from scratch, the Americans tended to do more gradual changes, morphing one system into another over time.
Prime example of this is the US Navy Standard system, now in its 3rd major incarnation but still outwardly similar and using the same name. And it can be argued that Standard is merely a further development of Talos and Terrier. The Nike family is also comprised of several missiles bearing the same name. And at current THAAD is several weapons, Patriot is now in its 3rd incarnation as well.
On the AAM side, AMRAAM is in its 3rd incarnation (though the AIM-120B was not produced), Sidewinder has seen over a dozen variants (including several SAM and ground attack versions, and anti-ship and anti-radar missiles).
Also, they may appear cheaper, but are they? A single missile costing a few million dollars can indeed bring down an aircraft costing a hundred million, but you will likely need several missiles to bring down that aircraft.
Also, missiles are far less flexible than are aircraft, taking longer to forward deploy (especially the larger ones that would replace long range fighters) and are more prone to suffering from environmental problems that aircraft do not. Just ask the British about the trouble with their SAMs during the Falklands campaign.
Upvote:5
The US also has the problem of where to put them. If you have anti-aircraft defences on your own soil it's rather too late (as Germany discovered) and the US is mostly surrounded by sea.
So you need very friendly allies to allow you to install, generally nuclear armed, anti-aircraft missiles in their country - which protects you but makes them an increased target
There were several generations of US AA missiles installed in Canada (eg Bomarc).
More post
- 📝 Escape attempts from Elmira POW Camp (Civil War)
- 📝 Diaries of Nicolas II
- 📝 Why did not Spain manage to keep any colonial possessions in the new world?
- 📝 How big were the biggest elections during the ancient era?
- 📝 Was an Elector part of the Electoral College for purposes of a Reichstag, if he was the Emperor of the HRE?
- 📝 Did Sir Isaac Newton ever claim that his mind in 1666 was "remarkably fit for invention"?
- 📝 Why aren't there any Chinese colonies?
- 📝 How to attack Fort Ross
- 📝 When did streets get names?
- 📝 Which lover of a Russian Empress obtained the highest rank?
- 📝 Did the food economy of the late Roman republic rely on foreign imports, or was it more localized?
- 📝 Why would high-ranking officers wear a helmet exhibiting their rank near the enemy?
- 📝 German WWI Retreat
- 📝 How did the crusaders "know" that they found the Holy Blood?
- 📝 Which tools were available in 1933 for the Chinese government to intervene in the money market?
- 📝 Why is such big density of churches in medieval towns?
- 📝 How did the Palace of Poitiers change from its depiction in Tres Riches Heures to now?
- 📝 What was the fate of Gülbahar, the chief consort of Sultan Suleyman of 16th century?
- 📝 What flag is similar to the American flag, but has only 9 stars and 13 vertical stripes?
- 📝 Is the term "chainmail" historically accurate, or a modern invention?
- 📝 Are there any good sources on the history of the name for Kazakhstan?
- 📝 Why didn't the Arab states industrialize?
- 📝 Is Jacques Le Goff's statement about medieval labor mechanization not leading to qualitative progress true?
- 📝 In Canada, is it true that when Mormons first arrived (1887) they weren't allowed to settle within 50km of Lethbridge?
- 📝 Intuitive misconceptions
- 📝 Was The Prince by Machiavelli intended as satire?
- 📝 What is the relation between the "Jacobins" and the "Montagnards" (French Revolution)?
- 📝 Does footage of WWI bombing of London by zeppelins exist?
- 📝 Historical Instances like the settlement of Pitcairn Island
- 📝 Was Cossack cavalry ineffective relative to other troops?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why did the United States not seriously develop Anti Aircraft Missiles?
- 📝 Why did the United States not resort to nuclear weapons in Vietnam?
- 📝 Why did the United States not invade North Vietnam?
- 📝 Why did the Japanese expect the United States navy would attack the Home Islands?
- 📝 Why did Germany not join the United Nations until 1973?
- 📝 Why did the United States enter World War I?
- 📝 Why did the United States drop a uranium bomb instead of a plutonium bomb on Hiroshima?
- 📝 Why did the states that were born out of the Louisiana purchase adopt a common law system, and not a civil law system?
- 📝 Why did United Kingdom not keep the colonies after Napoleon's defeat?
- 📝 Why did United States stop celebrating The Eighth(January 8) as a federal holiday?
- 📝 Why did the United States under the Articles of Confederation have a hard time getting funding?
- 📝 Why did the United States issue the Monroe Doctrine when it did?
- 📝 Why did the United States want to "make Europe prosperous once more" with the Marshall Plan?
- 📝 Why did the United States decide to cross over the 38th parallel to North Korea after they attacked South Korea?
- 📝 Why did the United States Army force Nez Perce to give up their own land?
- 📝 Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union when he was still busy fighting the United Kingdom?
- 📝 Why did archery not make a comeback when armor was phased out in the 18th century?
- 📝 Why does the United States keep using "old" date representations and imperial system, while being in the minority?
- 📝 Why did Canada not join the American Revolution?
- 📝 Why did the Western Roman Empire collapse but not the Eastern Roman Empire?
- 📝 Why did Britain and France not declare war against the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland in WW2?
- 📝 Why didn’t Japan attack the West Coast of the United States during World War II?
- 📝 Why did Europe not see Roman-era numbers of men participating in battles until the 17th century?
- 📝 Why did Hitler not order the use of poison gas in combat?
- 📝 Why would silk underwear disqualify you from the United States military draft?
- 📝 Why did the United Kingdom industrialize first?
- 📝 Did the United States have a third atomic bomb to drop on Japan?
- 📝 How did gold come to symbolize lower ranks than silver in the United States Air Force?
- 📝 Why are the signatures on the United States Declaration of Independence structured as they are?
- 📝 Why did Jews not immigrate to the Muslim world?