In what ways was the Gold Confiscation Act of 1933 beneficial/detrimental to Americans?
score:7
I am not a Marxist Political Economist. I am a Marxist labour historian. When I relate to economic history, I can only really talk about the way in which capitalism actually functions (with reference to the truth systems of academia) from a "firm level" or "proletarian" perspective. This question would require a Marxist political economist to answer it in terms of academic truth systems.
Therefore, as I'm incapable of giving an academic answer, I shall give a political answer based on the truth systems used by proletarian revolutionaries.
There were three crises in US political economy that are relevant here: 1890s (Long duration) 1919 1930s
The 1919 crisis was halted by smashing working class power, effectively a forced devaluation of the price of labour. The 1890s crisis was resolved by a long term devaluation of the price of labour through deflation. Gold standards benefitted large capitalists as it preserved the price capital through devaluation far more than it preserved the price of labour.
The reason why the 1930s political crisis could not be resolved through devaluation was that the Soviet Union existed, and the Europe wide revolutions of 1916–1921 were politically fresh and a real and immediate threat. The IWW was reviving in its new form as the CIO unions and the wildcatters in the 1930s. The CPUSA appeared to be a threat to capital. The option of forcing the proletariat to pay for the crisis was not viable, because of the very real demonstration that European proletariats would attempt to take capital during crises.
Further, the plan to grow consumer spending, grow capital growth and accumulation and tolerate inflation was an acceptable solution to the crisis of working class militancy.
Leaving the Gold Standard was merely a part of this further development of Fordism-Taylorism, and was essential for the development of the realisation of capital through a consumer good market (Department IIA). This has proved in the long run to be a far more successful method of accumulating capital than reliance upon realisation in Departments I or IIB (capital goods, luxury goods for capitalist consumption, respectively).
Was this "good" or "bad" for the average American?
In the 1890s the average american, the populist, the farmer labourer, the free silver advocate had been demanding an end to the deflationary nature of the gold standard. So they got what they wanted.
In 1919 the workers of Seattle and elsewhere in the US were demanding an end to the wage labour system and capitalism. Moving off the Gold Standard ensured that working class unrest could be bought off with inflation developed growth and consumption. So it was bad.
In 1933 the average American much more highly valued work, food, secure housing and freedom from want. By 1950 this had been delivered to male white industrial workers, and the myth that work, food, secure housing and freedom from want existed in the United States became a persistent myth until the 1960s ghetto riots. If compulsory gold standard deflation had existed in the 1930s, then it is unlikely that US capital would have bought off the US working class with a pittance out of the growth economy that persisted until the 1970s.
Upvote:10
It is a politically charged issue and it really depends on the economic and political side of the fence you're on (T.E.D gave the Keynesian view). As someone who's libertarian on most financial/economic policies, I see it as detrimental and that we're still feeling the negative effects of it today. As Alan Greenspan put it in Gold and Economic Freedom...
The abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to an unlimited expansion of credit. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists' antagonism toward the gold standard.
Basically, the other side of the argument is that FDR did not need to use this tactic to combat currency speculation or deflation. There were enough gold reserves to have maintained the value of the dollar sufficiently but not enough to do this and finance social welfare schemes like the NRA and so forth.
Therefore, I would tie the policy of abandoning the gold standard or a hybrid commodity system to the debt crisis that we're currently facing in the US and Europe. This video by Milton Friedman on the gold standard discusses it further. If you really want to get into all the details, visit FreeToChoose.tv.
I'd also say that gold confiscation restricted personal economic freedom which is another thing that I see as detrimental although those of other political views do not.
As I noted, it is something that's politically charged and if you're discussing it in most academic environments you'll want to stick with the Keynesian view in class discussions and papers to protect your grades (I'm probably risking down votes here for mentioning these views here). However, it's important that you know that there's more than one school of thought on this issue.
Upvote:19
FDR was not the first president to come to power during a financial "panic" (aka: Recession or Depression). However, he was the first one after the advent of modern economics, and he was listening to the new economists.
Economically, banning private holding of gold had the effect of propping up the US currency. Normally in hard times (and I think 1933 certianly qualifies) people try to trade in things of value they may have in favor of "safer" things, and Gold was traditionally viewed as the safest. Without the law, in the preceeding years people were trading their dollars in for Gold, which was taking a lot of cash out of circulation. That's certianly not something you want to happen when the economy needs help.
Part of the effect of this is that there was pretty hefty deflation (27%!) between 1929 and 1933. This is exactly what historically had happened during every "panic" before. Why? Because as people "paniced", they started buying gold, and there were less and less dollars floating around. Basic supply and demand tells you this will increase the value of the few dollars remaning, which effectively decreases the value of everything else not tied to the dollar by law (which Gold was at the time). Deflation.
The next thing he did, which you didn't mention, was take the USA off the gold standard. That didn't make people quit wanting gold, but it immediately put dollars back into the market with everything else (and instead made the prices of gold rise through the roof, of course).
The effect of this was that deflation was instantly no longer a problem
Note that we didn't have modern monetary theory at the time, so they didn't really have the option of increasing the money supply by lowering prime rates, like was done in the USA in the last (current?) recession. So prohibiting flight to gold by law was perhaps the best money-supply tool available (short of just mass-printing greenbacks).
So the basic answer is that during a financial panic, a flight to Gold takes money out of circulation, making things worse. Tying your currency to gold will additionally create deflation.
(Note: Charts and some content taken from this article: Puncturing Deflation Myths, Part 1 Inflation During The Great Depression.
More post
- 📝 Can anyone explain why a wreck of a battleship lies in the Nevada desert?
- 📝 How did the Mughals view h*m*sexuality?
- 📝 Were mounted soldiers really an advancement during the Middle Ages?
- 📝 When did the accusations of convict stain against white Australians stop being culturally significant?
- 📝 What kind of missile flew with such speed in 1st century BCE?
- 📝 What was the status of specialized workers during the Roman times?
- 📝 What did the Baltic Fleet do in Reval in 1904 and when was it there?
- 📝 How did Japan successfully conquer Vietnam (Southeast Asia) in WW2?
- 📝 Mnemonics for centures or any other longer periods, like Zodiac signs other than Chinese?
- 📝 How were large monetary transactions conducted in medieval Europe?
- 📝 John the Fearless: John I or John II? Can the French and the English agree?
- 📝 What is the oldest verifiably correctly translated written work?
- 📝 Were American mortars better than Soviet ones during WWII?
- 📝 Did the Zapatistas actually kill anyone?
- 📝 Why did Icelandic begin to diverge from the Continental north Germanic languages specifically between 1050 and 1350?
- 📝 Was Nebuchadnezzar made King in a year other than 605 BC?
- 📝 Will we ever be able to understand history with 100% accuracy
- 📝 In the US, why did anti-authoritarian sentiment grow only in the 1960s?
- 📝 What is this card, and why does it go "on the hat"?
- 📝 Whom does this statue to the left of the cordonata leading up to Piazza del Campidoglio depict?
- 📝 Why did Chamberlain remain Prime Minister of Britain until 10 May, 1940?
- 📝 When were the first mosques established in Constantinople?
- 📝 Where on a modern map are these areas of Ptolemy's map?
- 📝 Did the Safavid rulers require all subjects to convert to Shi'a Islam?
- 📝 Was there a particular area of Victorian London in which bookshops were concentrated?
- 📝 Why Ancient Rome Had No Economists?
- 📝 Where was the cultural inheritance of the Greco/Roman world/antiquity preserved?
- 📝 During the 1930-40s - World War 2 - were children taught English in Nazi Germany?
- 📝 Were Archimedes screws used in pre-modern times in the far east?
- 📝 Was there a viable alternate supply route to Australia during World War II?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 In what ways was the Gold Confiscation Act of 1933 beneficial/detrimental to Americans?
- 📝 What political events led to the Separate Car Act that was upheld in Plessy v. Ferguson?
- 📝 At the end of the Seven Years War, what was the total amount of gold and silver in Britain?
- 📝 What was the effect of the Disannexation Act of 1784?
- 📝 Did Adolf Hitler ever address the fact that his own appearance was almost an exact opposite of what he considered the ideal Aryan appearance?
- 📝 What was the historical context of the 2nd amendment to the US Constitution?
- 📝 During the breakup of the Soviet Union, on what basis was citizenship granted or withheld for each of the fifteen new republics?
- 📝 What was the typical peasant's diet like in Europe during the High Middle Ages?
- 📝 What led some people to (correctly) believe that there was no land under the ice cap at the North Pole?
- 📝 What was the status of Arab Christians during the crusades?
- 📝 What was the religion of the Arabic people before conversion to Islam?
- 📝 What was the purpose of Nazi extermination camps?
- 📝 What was the internal Soviet reaction to the moon landing?
- 📝 What was the function of the walls of Jericho?
- 📝 What was the pound (unit of weight) initially equal to?
- 📝 At what point was the Byzantine Empire's decline irreversible?
- 📝 What was the reason for Soviet troops to withdraw from Yugoslavia in World War II?
- 📝 What was the point of horse armour?
- 📝 What was the first solar eclipse that was demonstrably predicted in advance?
- 📝 What was the role of the Soviet Navy during WWII?
- 📝 What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?
- 📝 What was the economic basis for West Berlin?
- 📝 What is the evidence to claim that political order in ancient Rome was sufficiently different under "kingdom", "republic" and "empire"?
- 📝 What was the average height of Roman men and women?
- 📝 What was the longest a World War II submarine stayed at sea without being resupplied at a port?
- 📝 What was the cleanest war ever fought?
- 📝 What was the Seven Years War called at first?
- 📝 What was the first battle in history fought by vast-majority-% "distance-shooting" non-mechanized force?
- 📝 What / When was the first use of concentration camps in history?
- 📝 What was the ratio of German to Soviet losses on Eastern front during different stages of the war?