How were the Venera Probe missions received/presented in the Western world during the space race?

Upvote:1

>

Basically at this point I'm trying to figure out why most (some of the missions were spinned-off as successful even though they didn't achieve their goal.) of the info was secret and only released when USSR fell, and how everyone else reacted to the information released. I can't find which particular missions were kept in secret.

The Soviet space program was classified. A major component of the Soviet as well as the Western space program was for propaganda value. The west as an open society had to live with some of it's public failures and near failures. The Soviets didn't. They regularly would not announce launches until success was certain and failures were covered up.

Remember Laika? 1957, the first animal launched into Earth orbit. A landmark technological and political accomplishment which eclipsed United States capabilities at the time. The West knew little about the effects of space flights on living creatures and nothing about de-orbiting. The West also didn't know the Soviets didn't know how to de-orbit a capsule either. Laika died on reentry. The West found out about it decades later. The Soviets never planned for her to survive.

Other notable Soviet setbacks which the West only found out about during Gorbachev's policy of glasnost in the 1980s:

  • deaths of Korolev, details of deaths of Vladimir Komarov (in the Soyuz 1 crash), *see below
  • death of Yuri Gagarin (on a routine fighter jet mission) - First human to reach outer space, and first to orbit earth.
  • development failure of the huge N-1 rocket intended to power a manned lunar landing, which exploded shortly after lift-off on four unmanned tests.

(*) (on Soyuz 1) More than four decades later, details about the tragedy have steadily trickled into the Western consciousness…and they have revealed a harrowing disaster, still shrouded in myth, mystery and rumor.

Upvote:2

The basic organisational reason for all the secrecy and spin-doctoring of the Soviet space program was that they had no equivalent of NASA running it. It was run out of the back pocket of the Strategic Rocket Forces, the Soviet armed service that was responsible for long-range missiles.

The ICBM generals had a force to run, and improved missiles to build, and the kinds of rockets you need for space exploration are significantly different from ICBMs. The political leadership wanted space spectaculars, but didn't set up an appropriate organisation to produce them. So the space program was always short of money and time, and making things up as it went along, rather than having a coherent plan. The Vostok spacecraft was designed primarily as a photo-reece satellite; the Soyuz was originally designed for military purposes as much as exploration; several of the Salyut space stations were a military model, and the N-1 moon rocket was doomed because the designers could not get the proper materials.

In the early 1970s, when I was a teenager reading all I could get about space and astronomy, it was known that probes had been sent to Venus, and they hadn't been all that successful, but that was about all.

More post

Search Posts

Related post