Is there any evidence that the US strategy at Midway was deliberate?

score:5

Accepted answer

Yes, By Default

So, first off, I would recommend Shattered Sword: The untold Story of the Battle of Midway by John Lundstrom. While it focuses on the misconceptions about the Japanese actions at Midway (perpetuated by English-language single-source reporting of IJN actions long since discounted by Japanese source) it does an excellent job comparing and contrasting the two sides doctrine and training. Those differences are what led to the American's sending in numerous small waves and the final results.

It boils down to two things:

  1. The Americans, being inexperienced in live-fire carrier operations, simply did not have the skill to create the massed waves of attack craft the IJN made look routine. However, the American emphasis on individual and small-unit command initiative still led to eventual success.

  2. American SIGINT was phenomenal, and that wasn't luck. This combined with squadron leader individual initiative (and the lack thereof in the IJN as a whole) enabled the Americans to win.

I should point out that it wasn't a "lucky" last strike either. The long-reported (in English) story that the Japanese carriers were caught "with bombs on the flight deck" is simply wrong. (Again Shattered Sword gets into all this.) Instead, what happened is the poor command choices and undisciplined actions of the IJN Combat Air Patrol meant that the successive squadron-level strikes brought down the IJN air cover, which instead of climbing back to the correct altitude and position stayed low and away, (or better yet not ALL chase after a relative handful of American aircraft) enabling the later dive bombers to come in unmolested by Zeroes.

Could the Americans have lofted mass waves of squadrons and gotten home that way? Well theoretically yes. But practically speaking the Americans just didn't have the coordination or skill to mass multi-squadron, multi-carrier formations of aircraft.

Upvote:1

First, a little disclaimer: you're merging here strategy and tactic: the first one is the way they decided to nearly ambush the Japanese with their fleet (and this is rather considered as grand tactic), the second one is the way each of them organized their attacks.

Based on my numerous readings, from wikipedia to Naval Institute and many books, I would say the following:

  • The deliberate strategy of the Americans was to allow the Japanese attack to Midway and after this effort, to surprise them with their own attack
  • Midway's battle is full of blunders and considerations about the war fog
  • The deliberate tactics of the Americans, forced by their slowness to make their planes take off from carriers, was to attack in different waves that might divert from each other Japanese defences
  • The deliberate tactics of the Midway's air force commander was to harass the Japanese fleet while his own island would be under attack

I recommend the reading of The Samurai's attack, a book that goes on about the battle of Midway and how it integrates in the general list of events of 1942.

More post

Search Posts

Related post